VOTE: Remove/change the War Level System (Kebir Blue)

Perhaps the war continent idea isn't so bad after all.

Helps my point 1-7 PvP warring

No war levels on all worlds

All players have a secured main too. Not like anyones entire empire is at risk.

@SuperSoldierRCP

Did you read the statistic? It hurts your point. It helps the war continent idea.

I say:
Give the 22% a place to play war with each other. A war continent. And as some players from the 78% have said maybe they would put a country or two on the war continent and play with you.

Cheers,

Maestro

Meastro

Your an idiot. War continent will not help.

War Level 7: 9 players
War Level 6: 2 players
War Level 5: 1 player
War Level 4: 4 players
War Level 3: 6 players
War Level 2: 8 players
War Level 1: 19 players
War Level 0: 51 players

Opening 1-7 will give us a 51% of players on FB to teach intro to war. 51 lvl 0 on FB is BS

Correct me if I'm wrong but its called the war world right. It's not called the econ world. If u don't like it leave or stay under war Lvl 3. Stop trying to kill the war game.

You pro don't get this but a continent wouldn't work. To many players in 1space = bad.

Nuclear war/fallout means
Consent loss of CEO/states
Hard to run and econ.

Low pop means not much can be done.
Eventually the biggest players will rain supreme and again the same issues we have now. Several BIG EMPIRES will scare all the new small guys away. You want people to war give them more of a boost. Give the little guys a few extra T n weapons and that might pop them up to where they come seeking a teacher.

Lets put all the War players on a continent. Anyone ever notice that every maestro comment is very Godwin law directed

When 78% of the top 100 players on a world are under War level 3, I find it hard to call that world a war world.

Yes, FB is called the War World. But it's in name only. The reality is rather different. The numbers don't lie. The majority of FB players don't want to war vs other players.

So it appears I am the only one to bring up a reasonable idea to spice things up. More PVP war for war players. Some limited PVP war for econ players.

@Super - Leave the name calling for the playground.

@SirSmokesAlot - Wouldn't a couple of PVP wars a month get your juices flowing again?

Cheers,

Maestro

Then the GM should kick u off FB.(pay you for your assests then move on). There is no war levels in RL there is no WP in world. If wanna war go to FB if not pick on of the other end of story. You wanna play econ fine. Its called a CEO

Kicking 78% of the top 100 players off FB world. I'm on HOF leave so none of the top 100 is me.

...and ...There is no war peace on the War
Continent.

Putting all the warring players on one continent would deny one of the most interesting aspects of the tactical war game: making war on a country that is out of direct weapons range. Effectively it would be dumbing-down the war game, which I don't think anybody wants.

Hugs and respect

Jo

@Jo Salkilld

Thanks for the constructive feedback

Not all countries will be in tactical range on the war continent.

Perhaps if this is a major concern there should be 2 or 3 war continents.

@ that point y not make an econ continet

Bottom line is alot of players are afraid to fight because they dont know how or they are afraid of losing assets.
War continents will not fix the problem. FB is the war world and I can count on one hand the number of PvP wars there.
I think because there are so many aspects of the game that players need to use GCs(space docks,purchasing products only available from space, etc.,buying population,monthly 30GC fee, etc. people are trying to make GCs rather than spend them for weapons to fight with.
I believe the war game is dead except for the few who are at the same war lvl if they choose to fight.
One suggestion, instead of winning a players country maybe the winner can receive 100GCs or something along those lines.

After suffering this wholesomely pointless charade of altering yet again how this game works, the only solution is this.

Put some effort into playing the game more. Place less effort into what you believe in your tiny hearts to be the ideal outcome for anyone but yourselves.

If at the end of that pointless effort you feel as though this game as it is does not merit what your ideals are, quit.

If they do, play.

We are all here to enjoy and improve this game, but when the idea that is up for debate is another game altering implementation, you have overstepped your bounds.

Make suggestions for improving the game. This is a discussion about changing it. It is pointless. You change anything at the risk of offending others and this model has to become completely unacceptable.

You guys are wondering why the gm hasn't commented. But he has, several times and in several different places. War levels are here to stay. War level 3 on FB is fine and is yet another pointless change that will betray the building of those under level 3 for the few that have grown past level 3. This is unbalanced and again unnaceptable.

Question. What will happen after all those under level 3 down to 1 are eaten? Will you then propose to make level 0's up for war? No, yes? It proves the pointlessness of making even that change. After that, then GR or WG should become like FB?

Play the game, suggest improvement, not changes. War levels and c3 levels were added as an intended improvement. They have yet to improve in my opinion, but they have added a level of security that keeps players playing, and for that I thank you.

However, many of you that had an all seeing eye and were instrumental in the addition of war levels are now here again. Wasting all our lives and the gms efforts, at the expense of others.

It is selfish and rather redundant babbling. Now I demand you stop! Maybe I sound like an idiot, but that is how I feel. All this is hurting the game.

I'm done with this thread.

Cheers,

Maestro

Thank You Maestro, who else is done?

Good now we may proceed with the war levels.

Speaking of them does anyone notice how hard it is to move weapons when warring farther. The game has really pushed to land wars but its still hard to get units over longer distances(more resupply, more planning, more depots, ect) any chance the GM might give players who take C3 farther away more cash? Something and any news on these new war levels didn't we have 3 more coming?

No, this is pointless and retarded, the whole thread should be locked and erased with the presence of game-preservation in mind.

The only suggestion that matters is the one where we suggest that those unhappy with the game stop playing. Or keep playing. My suggestion, keep playing. Stop whining. Have fun. Stop crying. Love the game. Stop hating it.

Oh, now who else is done?

I have to agree with Appreciated Customer

@maestro, glad you're done

@Super

Then I can't be done until you and your war level group are done. My suggestion is only posted as an alternative to yours.

Remove your war level change and I remove my alternative from discussion.

And Wendy, thanks for the post.


Cheers,

Maestro

Perhaps a short message from the gamemaster on this thread.

1) War Levels are here to stay.
2) We have considered the war continent idea and for now decided to work on other game upgrades. Perhaps at a later time we will revisit it. It's possible in the future we will create a seperate continent for tournament purposes on each world.
3) Federations rules will be reviewed and upgraded as we see fit.
4) Use of War peace will be reviewed and upgraded as we see fit.


Cheers,

Maestro

Wow, tons of argue here.