World War 2 on WG (White Giant)

well chryso, you can revisit the above "loser leaves WG," or you can just drop it. thats all i am offering.

EC lol. If only your honor was equal to your humor.

Excuse my French, but you attacked with all you had the balls to attack with, and I'm cutting them off. Don't blame me if they are small. That is what you had the guts to take out of war protection and fight with.

For all the times you guys keep saying a win is not a win because you didn't risk real countries, my advise is to risk them.

The Boycott is a show of support of the WG community for you to take your countries out of war protection and fight like a man; or to seek peace. It is a condemnation of your attacking with C3s. It is not just me; 20 other people and counting have voted for you to fight like a man or stop fighting. Same for the rest of you 4 bullies.

Fact: EC's army size before the war: 47 million.

Fact: EC's army size now: 33 Million.

Even with all the new military he has bought, he has is down 14 million soldiers and officers. To put that in perspective, I started the war with 16 million soldiers and officers.

I have taken essentially (in addition to what he has rebuilt) as many troops as where in my entire army AND THIS IS JUST WHAT I TOOK FROM EC.

So, 4 people attack me. Their armies were several times the size of mine (about 10 times as large when combined), and I've killed -- from EC alone almost as many troops as were in my army when war started.

They had in their C3s more troops, than I did in my empire.

Bottom line is that with a 10 to 1 advantage, they failed their dishonorable unprovoked attack. They now hide in war protection.

My allies and I have taken 6 of their countries, including 5 in a row. Please join the boycott to make a statement that they need to make peace or leave war protection.

very well chryso, well keep on shooting.

wow, hordo, i wish i had the time to show you why people are complaining about c3 warfare... after all that

Orbiter, I hope you didn't mean you want to attack me. Even if you do so what. I will not be intimidated to bend the truth or lower my standards in my real life the everyday people would break a man's jaw and face for talking to a woman like keto and his fed talk to wendy. It is disgusting, I'll go to war if need be for pointing out that it is disgusting you aren't saying anything to me I will continue pointing out that these little boys need to act like men it is a game I don't care if you have time or not to show me what c3 war is all about. nothing you say or do will change my mind or hush me. Grow up little boys, try being a man and make you mothers proud.

Most of the remaining countries, I've agreed to let other people attack...

My only job is painting them.

Hordo - She's not a woman, she's a b*tch and has gotten far less than she deserves. In addition, she could be a dude...probably is, I'll choose to treat everyone in this game equally because who knows and to be honest, everyone should be treated equally anyway. Plus, (s)he's said and done far more than we ever will in a very short amount of time and instead of it being settled in game she hides in WP so she can talk sh*t and c3 dec everyone for whatever reason she feels like. It's bullsh*t and when you eventually have to deal with it (she's done it to every other person who at one time defended her), then you'll know what the deal is. No one can shut anyone up in this game, that's part of the problem. Everyone wants to yap, yap, yap and the entire game becomes about who has the most time to waste instead of who has the most talent or has worked hard.

That's some bullsh*t, the little attention whore hijacks every conversation, especially the conversations that have nothing to do with her. It's a joke.

W - (copied from other thread)
I never stated that I am logging into EO's account. I clearly stated that my brother (who I trained in 15 minutes about how to destroy you because you suck so bad) has been given EO's account while EO is away from the game dealing with school. My brother lives with me and I can document that information in any way the GM's find necessary. Bank statements, mail, licenses, whatever they want, we'll provide if asked by the GM's. There is no rule that two people living in the same house can not play Simcountry. Many people do it and I thought this would be a great time to bring my brother into the game, he has some free time and as are most people, is much smarter than you so it doesn't take him much time to learn how to kick your ass like everyone else has.

WhiteBoy I don't need to do any research I saw the whole war I know you like to tell people what they can or cannot think but I have two eyes to see and I report what I saw. You are selfish andself centered enough to think what you have to say is the only thing that matters but Keto was nuked more than 50 times, it is funny how you and your crew have selective memory, nukes are pretty useless if you nuke c3s but I counted as all ketos countries that were unprotected shed more than 10 million population each I would not call that a a useless part of the game. I know what I saw I don't need some big mouth telling me different mind your business I was not talking to you. I didnt really trust the advice given me but I should have wendy was telling me the whole time to take down the air defense first I thought it was impossible waste of time but she did it all by herslef more than 140K interceptors. so it was my fault for not listening. The only tperson that is ridiculous is you I hope the gms do something about you loggin in to fight from two accounts from 1 ip address. It doesn't matter if you have a brother or not who is to say it is not you? I can provide info for up to 10 people does that mean I should be logging on to someone elses account to fight? No Tom says it has to stop I wouldn't be so proud and loud mouth you may just have a surprise coming yet. Making someones identity does not prove anything except that 1 IP is using the accounts. Clearly against the rules. I don't think the whole game should be held accountable to a set of rules while you get away with breaking them. Your IP should be banned from EO's account that is bad for the game to continue letting you do that. I can make 10 more accounts and say my cousins want to play but will it not be obvious that I only want to multi?

You call people multi player yet break the rules and that is bad for the game becuase no one can know if it is you or not. Even if you have a brother it proves nothing the obvious is that your ip is governing two accounts and tom clearly expresses that it has to stop.

And I don't care for that juvenile kind of language towards a woman Whiteboy, this is a only a game you lowlife scumbag you need to grow up.

I remember Jonni telling Wendy to keep the forums clean for saying "bitching" which is only decribing an action, but you keep calling her bitch and I have not witnessed a gm or moderator warn you about your language. Are there two sets of rules that apply to everyone else and Whiteboy gets to break them and live by his own? Is he exempt?

*sshole, b*tch, f*ck, b*lls, d*ck

That's all clean, there is a TV show with one of those words in the title on network TV...can't remember which one.

Deal with it, stop crying about language like a little girl.

Hey, I'm a boy. What's wrong with being a boy?

Orbiter has left war protection for 4 real countries, and is now fighting with them.

Good for him to finally put something on the line.

So I assume you condemn C3 warfare?

finally? wow?

they've been out of protection. nearly the entire time.

they were out of protection when i dec'd

they were out of protection when the wars opened

after i took charity, i thought that would be the end of this event, so i put my countries into protection because i wanted a break

when i saw you demanding we leave WG... i took them out of protection. although, with torch, i over looked that one. i meant to take it out, i thought i did, but actually didn't

chryso, they were out of protection, nearly the entire time, except for torch and doom, which were merely an oversight

when i say "nearly," i mean, during this, they spent about 1 game month in protection

but go ahead, say "finally," so far 95% this has been you spinning...

and i think you can still squeeze in a few more decs on most, domino should only be able to get one more, but torch, salty lemon aid, and foo foo danda, can each get 4 more, that is if the 10 dec limit kicks in...

so fill me up with decs, i've been waiting, what 4 days? so yea, FINALLY

Serpent, my objection is to a larger attacker using a series of c3s while hiding in war protection when attacked a weaker opponent.

In my case, I was attacked by 4 people with combined armies 10 times my army's size. They did so while hiding in war protection. That is simply an unfair tactic.

Were the other countries not in war protection, my objections would be none or less.

Were the defender greatly outnumbered by multiple attackers, C3 warfar may sound more fair.

Orbiter,

My bad. Good for you. My appologies for saying your didn't have the guts to take your countries out of war protection. I was completely focused on EC, and just assumed the others were doing the same.

So, are you still planning to leave WG if you lose?

are you if you lose?

and if you are, you should probably take your countries out of protection also

Good point, I put them there after all the wars expired on them as a sign of peace...however, it looks like the war is back on.

If we are able to negotiate the terms of a war, I'm willing to agree to leave if we have a specific agreement on relevent conditions to ensure enforcement and terms.

First, it will be necessary to know the status of the war participants on your side, such as who is going to continue the fight, who agrees to leave, who agrees to whatever terms are agreed to.

Second, it will be necessary to understand how this will be enforced.

Third, the conditions that trigger victory must be agreed upon.

Finally, there are other matters, such as agreements concerning other worlds and other players that must be addressed.

Bottom line is that all is on the table. From war to the death with loser leaving WG to peace.

well, i'll send you my msn, and we can hash it out, as we have already filled this thread.

you certainly are correct, some boundaries need to be set. i mean, if we agree to this, what if a third party decides to jump in? ect...

but i'd like to leave you with this, i can only speak for myself, the seriousness of a wager of this kind... one can not speak for another.

one thing i'd like to point out, with the suggested changes...

SNAPP, has declared war on my nice countries, (not complaining,)

so how ever justified any one may think that they are. for this point, i'm not saying who's in the right or wrong, many people have many opinions, the point here, is what has just happened, in relation to upcoming changes...

snapp has declared war on the #3, 4, 5, and 25 war ranked countries... not the other way around

so with suggested changes, i would be able to buy officers, and soldiers... have increased spending limits, have the "start now" button, and i would of course start each war over the next 48 hours at my convenience, my allies could counter dec, so 5 of the top 10 war slaves would, over the next 48 hours, would start one war at a time, destroying SNAPPs military countries, one by one, at our leisure...

just pointing this out.

Mr Chrysostom, So then you agree with C3 warfare so long as it meets your prescribed criteria. OK I understand.

Serpent c3 warfare is not okay as long as it is not your friends doing it and if it doesn't meet your prescribed criteria?

Rhetorical ...

Serpent,

22 players on White Giant have voted with their boycotts to say that the type of warfare engaged against me was wrong.

Their own federation allies on another world (who fought with them on this world recently), have critisized publically the tactics used.

The issue is not a tactic in general, the issue is how this war was conducted. I'm not speaking in abstract. Nor about rhetoric. I'm saying that the WG community objects to how this war was conducted by the attackers.

They showed a lack of honor. When they had a 10 to 1 advantage, they attacked with a bunch of C3s, and even kept C3s in war protection. These are C3s, one with 17 mil and another with 15 mil in population with 0 corporations. All military.

Thats fine, all Im asking is if you condemn C3 warfare of any type? Simple question, it only requires a yes or no. Of course we all know how some others fell, like Windy! I was just curious about your thoughts.