Simcountry
Forum General Increase the Spin - Final vote tally (Kebir Blue)

Increase the Spin - Final vote tally (Kebir Blue)

M
Maestro2000 (Kebir Blue)
10 Apr 2011 14:22 Link
"Vote yes if you agree.
The number of game months on all worlds should equal 6 per real day."


The final vote tally

Yes 28 70%
No 12 30%
---
Total 40
B
Blueserpent (Fearless Blue)
10 Apr 2011 14:45 Link
*sighs

Im trying to recall a vote you have started, that was for the good of the game
and not your own selfish ends.......................................................................That'll be a no then
P
Parsifal (Kebir Blue)
10 Apr 2011 15:05 Link
no
M
Maestro2000 (White Giant)
10 Apr 2011 15:52 Link
This is for the good of the game. Speeds up gameplay.
M
Maestro2000 (White Giant)
10 Apr 2011 15:54 Link
...and 27 players agreed with me on this proposal.

You Yoda and 11 others disagreed.
B
Blueserpent (White Giant)
10 Apr 2011 16:04 Link
Are you for real?

not e1 is available to play 6 updates a day.
How is that good for the game?

All the vote tells us is 38 ppl could be bothered to look up the vote page.
M
Maestro2000 (Golden Rainbow)
10 Apr 2011 16:11 Link
"not e1 is available to play 6 updates a day."

So then increase the blackout periods if thats your concern.
B
Blueserpent (Little Upsilon)
10 Apr 2011 16:13 Link
What the hell have blackouts got to do with you wanting 6 updates?

Im talking workers, corps etc.

war hasnt been mentioned once


I can see it now...Maestro logs in and has missed 4 updates cos of work....



Ppl of simcountry i have started a new vote.
Through massive worker shortages and the need to close corps we need to go back to
less spins a day.
Thank you for listening
Maestro2000(biggest **** in sc )
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
10 Apr 2011 18:11 Link
assuming Maestro doesn't work the bar at the local Karaoke place and has his trusty laptop on the counter.

Meastro = greedy. He's war level 0 on all worlds, pays for no war protection and wants even more from the game. Right.

When I'm done... they'll remove war levels. Sooner hopefully more than later. Then Maestro will learn to play the game instead of crab off it.
M
Maestro2000 (Kebir Blue)
10 Apr 2011 18:22 Link
Greed Wendy? Are you looking in the mirror?
M
Maestro2000 (Kebir Blue)
10 Apr 2011 18:24 Link
War levels are good for the game. We just need more players....New players.
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
10 Apr 2011 18:39 Link
No I'm looking at you.

You have war level zero on every world, two ceos on every world, and you make decent money. The only incentive and motivation for you to push for more spins on all worlds is you get paid more rollover in a day. Duuh Losing!

Now when I look at myself I see that I do many things you could but won't ever do.

I have paid for War protection on LU for at least 6-8 countries every single month for more than a year. You don't. Did the same on GR last year.

I buy weapons for random purposes. You don't. Even if you do, it is to make a dollar, not to defend anything.

See I make money, and I spend a lot of it and put it back into the game. You just crab, PERIOD.

I don't cry for cheaper war protection like you do, even though hands down, I have paid for more war protection than maybe any other player in this game, possibly ever. If not the most, the first player place couldn't be far away at this point.

You try manipulating different aspects of the game especially on the war side, but you don't fight war. So it is either for you, or whoever you are financing to fight. You ask for cheaper war protection because with all those countries and your big mouth, if war levels ever dropped, you'd sure need it.


Long story short, you make all income, and no expense, yet you want more? Greedy is an understatement.

Did you have any other questions?
M
Maestro2000 (Little Upsilon)
10 Apr 2011 19:14 Link
I noticed a number of players posting on the board looking for more spin, so I put it up for a vote. 70% voted yes (28 out of 40 players)

In my simcountry career I have paid plenty for WP. (A boatload)
B
Blueserpent (Fearless Blue)
10 Apr 2011 19:34 Link
There's a lot of players want no war restrictions back...you gonna put a vote up for that too?
L
Lorelei (Golden Rainbow)
10 Apr 2011 19:48 Link
Maestro,

Pertaining to your statement,
"War levels are good for the game. We just need more players....New players."

I, also, who have played the eco side of the game, disagree. War levels are stupid and prohibitive, especially on the war world. The ability to play a friendly economic game was put in place to those who didn't want to be bothered by war. So if you want no war, play peaceful. Simple as that.

This game in my opinion to sustain and offer full advantages needs to lift the war level restrictions. I think you will see that most players do not like the war levels in place. I have paid my share of WP over the years, and have never complained.

I like the 'federation' concept. You want protection, you want unification, you want to learn.... join a fed. If you don't want to fight, then just set up air defense to contribute and help your fed in boosting their economies. The war levels even make it impossible to be a decent fed in times of war.

I'm so sick of changes. Leave the time clocks alone in the various countries. Leave EVERYTHING alone. I have heard over and over of players being sick of pouring money into the game, and then change upon change screws everything up.

As far as new players, yes we do need new good players. Sadly, because of multi account abuse, it deters players from wanting to invest their time and energy in teaching new players. It's gotten to where every new player that comes into chat, you question.

I say this with all due respect.
M
Muslimsk8r (Little Upsilon)
10 Apr 2011 20:03 Link
If they removed wp then would that count for free players to or just ones that pay? I play for free and am part of a fed. If Wp is taken off I should be allowed to fight with my fed aganist other presidents what is the point if I am forced to sit on the sodelines and watch my fed lose if it comes to that . For people that pay the GC you get should be advantage enough.
B
Blueserpent (Fearless Blue)
10 Apr 2011 20:17 Link
Free players shouldnt be allowed to war PvP.
S
SuperSoldierRCP (Fearless Blue)
10 Apr 2011 20:25 Link
WG should be 3 months
KB/GR should be 4 months
FB should be 5months
LU should be 6months.

If you want WG to compete with LU double its production..... Leave time as is
M
Maestro2000 (White Giant)
10 Apr 2011 20:26 Link
On FB world, the war world they have unrestricted war. War Level 3 and above.

So just get some more people interested in the game and this conversation goes away.
B
Blueserpent (Fearless Blue)
10 Apr 2011 20:36 Link
how does e1 sat at under war lvl 3 allow a war game to be played? regardless of the world.

more ppl = more sat at war lvl 0

Simple answer.. do away with war restriction and re introduce WP as it used to be.
Those that dont want war buy WP.

War lvls i have no problem with them, ppl can learn basic war.
M
Maestro2000 (White Giant)
10 Apr 2011 20:39 Link
Do a better job of talking to new players and they will join the ranks of war level 3 players on FB world and other worlds.

Send them the links for player simcountry websites.
Send them free advice on how to better their econ.
Send them advice on how to take a C3.
Send them advice on basic warfare.

Pointing a finger at me is a waste of time.

We are all here for our imagine time.

Start imagining a strategy to add 50 new war level 3 players every month on each world. Them implement the plan. You can do it.


B
Blueserpent (Fearless Blue)
10 Apr 2011 20:40 Link
LOL have you seen how many FB players are under war lvl 3?

Maestro, get a grip dude

War has all but been eliminated
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
10 Apr 2011 21:32 Link
Maestro takes too many drugs...


<!-Quote-!>Quote:

In my simcountry career I have paid plenty for WP. (A boatload) ~Maestro<!-/Quote-!>



And there you go, when you did it was keeping your GC stash at bay wasn't it? And then you screamed for cheaper War Protection. A self serving request. Which points us back at your request for more spins on ALL worlds.

If people loved more spins more people would go to LU. if LU filled up, you'd have a realistic expectation to speed another world to 6 months per day. Until then, a blanket move for all worlds is unwarranted when there are some people want to play slower.

Maestro, this game isn't just about you. You did a nice job of trying to make this look like an everyone issue. No duuh, people do like playing 6 months that is why LU is so popular. But if everyone liked it, that world would be at capacity, and the other worlds empty.


<!-Quote-!>Quote:

Maestro, get a grip dude

War has all but been eliminated ~Blueserpent<!-/Quote-!>



He wouldn't know because he has never played. At least under his new name.
M
Maestro2000 (Golden Rainbow)
10 Apr 2011 21:49 Link
Hey I'm not the only person who voted for the increased spin.

As far as name goes, my game name has never changed and my ceo names are still the same.
M
Muslimsk8r (Little Upsilon)
10 Apr 2011 22:13 Link
I fail to see why free's shouldn't be allowed to engage in PVP combat. The free countries already don't have nukes so we are behind the eight ball in that regard. There are more effective ways to ensure that free players aren't just flooding in to create war. Like having a mandortory active period (2-3 months realtime) before being able to declare war on another player this would ensure that the player would have at least somewhat a good understanding of the game and the politics that play into his or her world. A second option would be to give the SC some "teeth" and actually make them a threat to rouge countries.