Increase the Spin - Final vote tally (Kebir Blue)

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

I oppose in the name of game diversity.

I would change my mind, if this particularly kind of diversity isn't valued by others.

Seeing as faster worlds still have vacant countries, they either prefer the slow pace or don't value the higher pace of other worlds enough to move.<!-/Quote-!>

This is the indicator to follow and it says no.

Why didn't this continue in the previous thread?

More people than ever have, played this game when it was free to all, and there were no GCs and cash accounts.

There were no restrictions on war because nobody could go whining about the loss of their real world assets, when somebody took all there countries.

But noooo!?! W3C wanted more money?!?. So came GR and resets. People left, and people whined, and people made stupid polls. The participation in the game declined each and every time W3C tried to make a smaller and smaller active player base happy. The number of players registered may improve, but the number players actually engaging in the game has been in freefall for a long time.

W3C, needs to hire a consultant to help them come up with a profit model that actually works.

Also historically the number of spins, has depended on the speed of the server, If your good you don't need to log in every month to keep your country running.

And on a side note: In the olden days, everyone one of you would have been eliminated by the endless Whack-a-Tard game, that we played. Well except Parsifal(and Laguna who was posting while I was)..... However perhaps that game was a part of the problem.

I know, I know Laguna...

cuz maestro likes random posts of tard strength....

like this one...

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

Maestro2000 (Little Upsilon)
Tuesday, April 5, 2011 - 06:07 pm Click here to edit this post

So what are the current world speeds now? Have they made any unannounced changes? <!-/Quote-!>

apparently trying to spark the conversation we are now having...

"Whack-a-Tard..."!?

Excellent. Where do I sign up?

I do not take any of the comments above personally. But personally I will continue to speak my mind.

It is unfortunate that only a handful of players speak their mind on the board.

Well if it is any consolation, Maestro.... At least what you write does get responded to. My comments here weren't even note worthy lol

Agreed with Hymy. This game is suppossed to be a sim in the real world in theory every country could attack every other one. So why is not every single country involved in perpetual warfare? because of economic concerns,and the threat of U.N. action. For this game to call itself "sim" it needs to incorparate these real world elements into gameplay. If you have money invested in the game and don't want to be invaded simply join a fed or appeal to the (hopefully) stronger SC. There are no artificial barriers to keep some players pride intact at the expense of the game as a whole.

Whack-a-tard, became impossible when W3C implemented secured countries.

Don't we all want to give someone a piece of our mind?... That's what lobotomies are for.
~ Laguna

LOL

I can see the ban hammer swinging soon

I see another hammer swinging soon. bb2

Wow, and I thought I was bad...

Speaking of speaking minds...

Although I do not condone this kind of behavior

Double-Bob is now my hero... He will be missed

Hail The b00b World Order!

i died when i read wendys comment +5 points

"This game is suppossed to be a sim in the real world in theory" ...Muslimsk8r


So explain how in the real world countries can sell 1 million of it's citizens in one shot. How real world is that?

i must say, that was pretty classy lg, i'll give you 2 point for that

I'd be up for moving GR or KB from 4 to 6, but aside from that the game speeds are fine how they are. I like speed at 4 game-months per day quite all right.

"So explain how in the real world countries can sell 1 million of it's citizens in one shot. How real world is that?"

I'm only talking about how this pretains to the war game. OF course thier are other unrealistic elements in this game due to the inclusion of the GC and cash market. So are you saying that the point of this game isn't to mimic real world countries in a Sim format? Hence the word theory that I used.

I thought the point of a game was to enjoy it, and to be successful at it if you're a competitive type of person.

Any other game I've ever played has a rule book or set of rules and those are what you play by. (excluding me making up rules on my little brother when we were about 10 ).

If there's an issue, highlight it, but otherwise keep your daft suggestions to a minimum. Careful what you ask for, you can all see the results of the much asked for but badly implemented war levels.

Nonsense!

This is the real problem with Simcountry.

Agreed

lol

Does this mean I'll still be playing SimCountry when I'm in my 80s and 90s???? :S Yikes! lol

Uh oh! We've been rick-rolled...

Nonsense!

That is a detailed and informative video. Watch it until the end.