U.S and Israel to attack Iran soon

I couldnt agree more. Are you using the jokers picture as your own sublimental message? You know, the joker burns money to show hes not a slave to it.

No. I just love the Dark Knight, although the Joker is a really interesting character. His views and philosophies on chaos, leadership etc. are really spot on in some cases.

The Dark Knight was a recently adopted name for Batman. The Dark Knight means something else...providing this illuminati shit is real. They chose that name i believe for an antichrist type figure. For example, in the movie Bruce Wayne represents a capatilist. The good guy who must save Gotham and the world from the evil money burning terrorist like the Joker. While really, the Joker is the good guy in real life. Saying he will not be a slave to the elite and their modern day slavery. Just a little something i get from the movie. However i think the movies are fuckin awesome...

I know. I love the Dark Knight Movie.

And I think you're pretty right. I've always thought of it as a bit over-praising of capitalism, although I do like how the series of movies by Nolan attack greed and also America's paranoia of terrorism. The recent movie especially.

I agree with tom in that our foriegn policy has been totally off ore WW2 Is the only way to go isolationism BUT the US definitely hasn't been the worst superpower ever would you rather have the Soviet Union what about European imperialism that was much worse then our modern day meddlings I concede we were involved but definitely in a much less fashion I'm not even going to name all the massacres and exploitation that occurred but that doesn't mean because of some dodgy parts of our history we should just let it all happen again kasper that would be the height of folly

well we subjugated and killed millions of Indians why shouldn't Hitler be allowed to conquer Europe and enact a genocide WHO ARE WE? that is a liberal attitude that funnily doesn't allow for any progress again

we are not their for oil that is non sense because guess what we don't get that Much oil from the middle east and the stuff that we.do get comes from Saudi Arabia we have no interest in Iraqi oil (we are a larger producer then Iraq) and idk if Afghanistan is even a large producer of oil

and you say the elite uses it for their SUVs lol I imagine the elite isn't that big while their SUVs are big I doubt they need the oil of a whole country and it would probably just be easier to take over an American oil company if they don't already own it (that way they wouldn't have people like you after them)

also one million people killed is a disgusting exaggeration and most of the people killed were from car bombs IEDe etc not exactly the type of weapons the US military uses....if the enemy is going to blow io their own people and use them as human shields well frankly that's not our guys fault

also I never said we went their to help the people please don't put words in my mouth I'm not an expert but I imagine we could have tine to a thousand places to help people we went their most likely because of partisan politics and an idiot of a president "helping people" was just a side result and I imagine the term helping people is controversial but I think most people in Iraq and afgahnistan are happy not to be living under oppressive regimes such as the Taliban and Saddam both were threats to their own country.s and the region and contrary to what you may think the people of the middle east don't all want to be brutally subjugated by religious extremist regimes there was plenty of opposition to both governments internally before we went in and yes dictators aren't gasing their own people because of racist hatred or not letting women go into public that was abit of cultural diffusion

Schlumberger (SLB), Baker Hughes (BHI), Weatherford (WFT), and Halliburton (HAL) have committed to drilling 2,500-3,000 new wells per year and building new pipeline and shipping terminal infrastructure that could make Iraq the world’s largest oil exporter. The value of these contracts may reach a massive $60 billion over the next six years, and could generate $1 billion in new revenues for each company per year.
http://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/The-Gold-Rush-In-Iraq.html

the problem is even worse I didn't read the whole article cuz i know what it says anyways i posted it so you'd get a clue. It's not right that we enter into a country for oil. BUT ITS A WHOLE LOT WORSE, when we do it not for our countries oil supply but so rich americans can make money off of it, and not allow the country itself to benefit. This corporate atmosphere is so destructive. And we need to completely clean house of all of our leaders

hmmm perhaps you've got a point there actually seems to make some sense but isn't a few billion in revenue pocket change especially compared to the money we spent invading Iraq and I doubt it will change where America itself gets oil from if we didn't invade Iraq or afgahnistan gas prices would still be the same they are now not the bogus 20 dollars a gallon there are other markets id imagine this is just some rich Americans exploiting an opportunity to make some money nothing to unusual and not to significant in the grand scope of things

compared to the money we spent invading YES!!!!! but it just goes to show you how in order for the corrupt to siphon money from the government it has to to waste a ton. Bush didn't invade Iraq to make the country richer, it did it to make his friends richer. But 1B$ is not chump change in regards to individual corporations. 2011 net income of Halliburtun 3.08B in 2011 and before that significantly smaller as you go back

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

and the I.R.A. has sure been quite lately.
<!-/Quote-!>

Lmao, the IRA exists on American donations!

But yes, generally I perceive the UK/US relationship as the famous 'special' one. We believe in spreading democracy and human rights too. We've also been seen as doing the dirty. An ex Prime-Minister, Tony Blair (one man who I truly despise) was found guilty of bringing GB into the Irag war on WMD with absolutely no proof, in fact contrary proof, of their existence.

It must be quite obvious to all of us (western world) that we desire control of the worlds oil supply. As someone said earlier, whoever does that has the world by the nuts. Just as some countries like Saudi, Kuwait, Dubai etc want control of the banks and tourism etc. The thing is, some leaders have seen fit to gain this control with force under the guise of human rights. Not saying there weren't genuine HR needs to address. But read a bit deeper about Husseins regime and you will see he was doing plenty too increase welfare, like the worlds largest water movement system to irrigate lands and all that goes with it. So off to war they go, and remember, in the long run, war is good for a country, just witness modern Germany.

Anyway, if Obama was a stronger/madder president then the west would be invading Iran right now. Just as well he isnt and neither is Cameron. I wouldn't fancy stirring up the hornets nest that is Russia and China and probably N.Korea either.

I dont think we have the right to deny Iran whatever technology they want, hell why should all the major players in the west have it and not them? I do think we have have the right to stop them using nukes at all costs. Just like your guns people.

Crafty as im sure you been reading my post, you should know i agree with everything there.

EXCEPT for the guns part. I guess we will just have to agree to disagree on that one. However im not totally agiasnt the idea...like i said, if it was up to me....citizens in my country wouldnt have them. However i know i wouldnt ever treat my people like slaves as i think the goverments of the world would in this world. And i would also have more security to pretty much make crimes like rape and breaking into houses basically impossible. Thats a plan i hope to put in effect one day with something i call the Great Quinton communities. I want to revolutionize the way people live...and im talking real world. Thats the plans for my money if i ever make it big. Im not selfish and dont need millions of dollars to myself. I have bigger plans.

But with the way this world is, i think guns are neccesary. And will become even more so in the coming years. Take away the ability to rape, rob, and other shit...and i will agree to take away guns to stop this senseless killing, even tho i think it could be goverment sponsored. Thats something i will not stake my rep on.

But yes, the western world is pretty much bullies and oil hungry regardless of what Alex thinks. I think Iran made its own grave with their presidents comments, if they never said dumb shit like that.....i say let them feel secure and build what they want. We have them, so should they.

Ok, my last (ish) words. Read with more care what I said Kasper. I'm saying every American should have the right to own a gun, they always have since the constitution was signed and it wont change. Just as nukes are here to stay, even for Iran. But stopping people mis-using them (which in nuke weapons case is probably every case, unless we need some day to blow up a meteor or some such) stopping misuse must be the main priority, by hook or by crook.

Ohhhhh, gotcha. Lol. I Agree. This time 100%. Too bad we dont have that shit that one movie had where they were able to see every crime and stop it before it happened. I would like to see a REAL ( Not false flag ) Global threat from an outside force where the world would put aside our differences and band together. Using Nukes on such as a meteor or something.

I believe it was Reagon would also had that dream.