Okay, My turn to post.
Wendy your game ethics are really starting to suck. All though I didn't always agree with what you were saying or doing. Even though we never spoke one on one. I had some respect for u, for how you played the game, and for your forum posting mania. But that has changed. When the auto war dec went out I contacted you about a peace deal. I even explained that Steve was acting on his own and I had no idea what he was up to. Had no clue he even deced the inactive. Your response to me was I needed to contact your fed chairman David Walker about working on a peace deal. But you also said because of Steve's actions a price would be paid. . So I did contact walker I and walker came to a agreement and made peace. He even sent you a email asking you to stand down. Now what kind of fed member disobeys their chairman, especially after claiming that a peace offer was up to the chairman. Here is were things went wrong for yah. You focused on a player that's willing to stand down for something his chairman did. So mean while your planning to attack me not giving any thought to helping your chairman Who by the way lost a country. or the fact that steve should pay the price for his action. Had you taken the peace with me and focused on Steve the one who started it all, you may have been looking at a different out come.
Being that Wendy wants to post my emails I thought why not just post some of them myself .....
Steve I didn't want to ditch you but you left me with no other choice. Had you come to me from the get go I would of had time to decide what to do. Last we spoke you had personal issues and was going some what inactive. I never heard another word from yah after that. I knew everyone pretty much left the fed so I figured we were no threat to anyone. Had you come to me with a creditable reason to go to war I would of gone to war with you. And backed you 100%. Unfortunately it didn't work out that way. Guess only time will tell if full trust can be rebuilt. Bad Dukes
Multi accounts. I totally think they are wrong. I do have some knowledge of how a log in system works. I may have a idea on how to detect multi accounts. Every time you log in to a account "if coded right" it keeps a log on member log ins. With in this log you can collect all types of information. Like how long they spent on the site, your computer name, but most importantly you can log the users IP Address. For those who don't know what that is, its a address your local ISP uses to identify you on the network / world wide web. It contains info like city state and a formatted set of numbers. With this information you can code a program to search the log for active accounts created and or logged into by the same IP Address. I personally would investigate any IP address that has created more then 2 maybe 3 accounts first. That would root out most of the big offenders. I mean come on do you really think one house hold is going to have 5 to 7 accounts. To help deter new multi accounts from happen you can limit one free account to each IP Address. Then once a house hold wants to set up another account on the same IP Address they'd need to become a full member and confirm that more than one person is using the multi accounts. That's just my thoughts and with out knowing more details on how simc uses this information or if they even collect it. I cant truly say this idea would work. Bad Dukes
blue serpent When you going to sell those countries to me :-)... email me a offer .... say hi to jan for me thanks. Bad Dukes
Oh and Wendy as for the nuke defense. Your guess is as good as mine. I can tell you this much I know there are many errors in the game you and others have posted many of them in the past. Sometimes they work in your favor other times they don't. In this case they are not working in your favor lmao rotfl crying my stomach hurts I'm out of my breath quit your killing me ....... Bad Dukes PS My targets are still undefended ;-)