Quote - "Ok, a final post-war update. I sorted federations by their total game score. I then moved The Mob to the top of the list. The reason I hand-moved them to the top is in recognition of their victory over WGC. Although I have no desire to encourage or support unprovoked attacks designed to obtain bragging rights; it would be fundementally disshonest to not place The Mob at the top of the list , given what took place this weekend." Chrysostom
As a result of personal opinion: which is fundamentally flawed btw, because you sorted by score, as observed by your statement above.
Now if you sorted by who won the last war or some other discretionary statistic or value, you could fundamentally place whomever you wanted at the top of the List.
However score is not left to the discretion of someone compiling the statistics. Score is a set value, or fixed value. To say that that you sorted by score then violated your own variable used to apply ranking, is literally a fundamental error on your part.
Had you sorted by Super Butt Kissing Value, then yes, you being author, you could then place whatever federation that you'd like to kiss the butt of most, at the top of the list.
So, in conclusion, I am correct in stating that, you are incorrect in your application of 'fundamental error', when placing a lower scoring federation over the highest scoring federation in a table that is sorted by highest score. Even given the updates before, during, and after the war, the mob still has yet to pass them in score.
Your argument would be justified had you substituted Super Butt Kissing as a value in the place or score, in any instance.
You are fundamentally corrected. You're Welcome.
I won't post any stats. I never have or will. They are fundamentally a waste of time. I detest wastefulness in any form. I never really cared about stats. I think they are Ghay, kinda like you. Ghay in a corny kinda way, not homophobic, so don't mistake the message there.