Simcountry
Forum White Giant Federation Military Stats (White Giant)

Federation Military Stats (White Giant)

C
chrysostom (White Giant)
06 Aug 2010 18:57 Link
FederationArmy (millions)Population (millions)Income (billions)Total Assets (billions)CountriesPresidents
WGC47510,686$26,192.7$2,627,971.722433
The Mob2082,483$5,823.7$438,474.5689
Zero Hour801,645$5,277.4$515,884.3234
SNAPP732,388$5,061.5$779,571.68843
Cuckoos Nest31737$1,886.8$310,065.6134
WG United Nations6450$713.5$200,769.2141
S
Serpent (White Giant)
06 Aug 2010 22:25 Link
Great post! I do have a question though. Who is the underdog? Is this unfair?
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
07 Aug 2010 03:58 Link
Who is the underdog? WGC has better military statistics on-paper. However, The Mob has the advantage of a surprise attack.

Is this unfair? War is never fair.
B
Blueserpent
07 Aug 2010 05:22 Link
countries/pop/army activated =
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
07 Aug 2010 18:09 Link
I posted the paper statistics; people can decide for themselves how to interpret them. I don't believe that paper statistics are all that matter in a war. They matter, but so do other factors.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
07 Aug 2010 18:47 Link
federationArmy (millions)Population (millions)Income(billions)CountriesPresidents
WGC3658,710$20,94819133
The Mob1992,482$5,787689
Zero Hour801,647$5,265234
SNAPP732,394$5,0858843
Cuckoos Nest31737$1,880134
GSE22384$1,02272
Insane Asylum16195$54842
Ohio Independent14360$77281
Aurora Australis13254$71341
White Rose Commonwe12456$1,20581
Final Fantasy11364$88581
WG ZONE10250$77061
TGDF10280$91451
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
07 Aug 2010 18:53 Link
The war results so far so WGC has 110 million fewer officers and soldiers, The Mob has 8 million fewer officers and soldiers. WGC has 33 fewer countries, the Mob has the same number as before. WGC has lost 6 trillion in income and almost 2 billion in population. The Mob is about the same. These losses took place over the last 24 hours.

NOTE: these stats do not include countries owned by The Mob or WGC that are not in a Mob or WGC federation. The Mob owns a substancial number of countries (including those taken from WGC members) that are not in Mob federations.
This is simply providing publically avalible data.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 02:00 Link
Data after 1 more month.

FederationArmy (millions)Population(millions)CountriesPresidents Income (billions)
WGC3378,25518433 $19,512
The Mob1992,458669 $5,696
Zero Hour801,649234 $5,259
SNAPP732,3978843 $5,057
Cuckoos Nest31737134 $1,869
GSE2238372 $1,015
Insane Asylum1719542 $551
Ohio Independent1436081 $764
Aurora Australis1325441 $710
White Rose Commonwe1245681 $1,191
Final Fantasy1136481 $887
WG ZONE1025061 $764
TGDF1028051 $907
WG United Nations6450141 $708
Nuclear Weapon Stoc6205101 $282
O
Orbiter (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 06:52 Link
thank you chrysostom
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
08 Aug 2010 20:45 Link
Ok, a final post-war update. I sorted federations by their total game score. I then moved The Mob to the top of the list. The reason I hand-moved them to the top is in recognition of their victory over WGC. Although I have no desire to encourage or support unprovoked attacks designed to obtain bragging rights; it would be fundementally disshonest to not place The Mob at the top of the list, given what took place this weekend.


federationtotalscorePresidentsPopulation (millions)Army size (millions)Income (billions)Production (billions)Assets (billions)
The Mob7825392,414197$5,612$11,514$348,001
WGC357106337,946314$18,520$50,880$2,005,470
SNAPP147142432,40074$5,065$17,498$740,612
Zero Hour6399141,64979$5,248$11,755$508,497
Cuckoos Nest28045473731$1,857$3,168$313,510
Nueva Vida2802326791$1,719$6,572$513,144
White Rose Commonwe21109145612$1,183$4,636$161,243
WG ZONE15576125010$763$2,004$75,573
WG United Nations1482614506$704$2,526$199,703
TGDF12570128010$914$1,744$644,546
Final Fantasy12447130510$756$2,272$91,982
Ohio Independent11619136014$765$2,314$146,307
GSE11149238322$1,016$2,443$106,493
Aurora Australis10979125413$709$1,641$180,927
Nuclear Weapon Stoc962212056$281$567$14,894
Lowania58612642$90$350$10,948
Insane Asylum5707219517$552$792$22,925
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
13 Aug 2010 03:14 Link
Updated Federation stats

FederationtotalscoreCountriesPresidentsPopulation (millions)Army MillionsIncome BillionsProduction (billions)Assets (billions)
The Mob650484872,143166$5,095$9,464$303,166
WGC278256147296,101217$13,798$33,154$1,694,137
SNAPP17431299452,77295$5,838$17,012$763,297
Zero Hour606932141,55578$5,009$10,174$425,083
Cuckoos Nest2810713473731$1,848$3,086$296,780
Insane Asylum87306331027$898$1,443$41,758
GSE114727238523$1,037$2,109$72,560
BEO172728145020$1,177$2,815$92,066
Ohio Independent114538136015$799$1,918$138,556
Aurora Australis109774125413$709$1,604$176,933
White Rose Common209158145612$1,186$4,176$150,007
WG ZONE159906125410$791$1,870$55,601
TGDF127595127910$923$1,635$651,709
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
13 Aug 2010 03:26 Link
Kind of fundamentally dishonest to sort by total score than hand pick the number 1 spot lol.
S
Serpent (White Giant)
13 Aug 2010 05:20 Link
Jealous?

Yes you are!

I can see it in your typing!
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
13 Aug 2010 05:37 Link
A statement pointing out errors of fundamental hypocrisy are in no way Jealous.

I think you are fundamentally incorrect.
It shows in your typing.
S
Serpent (White Giant)
13 Aug 2010 06:20 Link
Naaa but you are FUN-DA-MENTAL, or at least you think its fun! Muh hahahah, thats funny, I dont care who ya are!
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
13 Aug 2010 15:59 Link
Wendy,

For the latest update, I sorted by army size. It is in the previous update that I sorted by the game's Total Score metric. I do not agree with the total score metric as it overrates players who play for goals such as leveling and maintaining the highest possible score. It underscores players who play to make a profit out of their countries, to make a profit from raids, and who have real militaries rather than on-paper ones.

The reason, in the prior update that I placed The Mob over WGC is that they had just won a war against WGC. This time, I placed The Mob over WGC to maintain tradition. Namely, because I had placed The Mob over WGC last update, and see no reason to change the practise at this time.

However, that said, Wendy, you are more than welcome to reply with your own list of the order you believe the federations should be ranked.
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
13 Aug 2010 19:57 Link
Quote - "Ok, a final post-war update. I sorted federations by their total game score. I then moved The Mob to the top of the list. The reason I hand-moved them to the top is in recognition of their victory over WGC. Although I have no desire to encourage or support unprovoked attacks designed to obtain bragging rights; it would be fundementally disshonest to not place The Mob at the top of the list , given what took place this weekend." Chrysostom

As a result of personal opinion: which is fundamentally flawed btw, because you sorted by score, as observed by your statement above.

Now if you sorted by who won the last war or some other discretionary statistic or value, you could fundamentally place whomever you wanted at the top of the List.

However score is not left to the discretion of someone compiling the statistics. Score is a set value, or fixed value. To say that that you sorted by score then violated your own variable used to apply ranking, is literally a fundamental error on your part.

Had you sorted by Super Butt Kissing Value, then yes, you being author, you could then place whatever federation that you'd like to kiss the butt of most, at the top of the list.

So, in conclusion, I am correct in stating that, you are incorrect in your application of 'fundamental error', when placing a lower scoring federation over the highest scoring federation in a table that is sorted by highest score. Even given the updates before, during, and after the war, the mob still has yet to pass them in score.

Your argument would be justified had you substituted Super Butt Kissing as a value in the place or score, in any instance.

You are fundamentally corrected. You're Welcome.

I won't post any stats. I never have or will. They are fundamentally a waste of time. I detest wastefulness in any form. I never really cared about stats. I think they are Ghay, kinda like you. Ghay in a corny kinda way, not homophobic, so don't mistake the message there.
J
Jiang Hu Warrior (Kebir Blue)
14 Aug 2010 01:52 Link
eh i dont get it.....................is it cos we are thick
L
Laguna
14 Aug 2010 01:56 Link
No, chrysostom, Wendy is right. Descriptive statistics are descriptive, not inductive.
C
chrysostom (White Giant)
15 Aug 2010 01:18 Link
Wendy,

Thank you for your input. I would appreciate if you would take back calling me Ghay, or saying that I'm Super Butt Kissing. I have no problem if you accuse me of "butt kissing," but I believe to add the word "Super" before it goes too far. I have never made similar accusations of you, and those accusations are not fair about me.

Thanks :-)
B
Blueserpent (White Giant)
15 Aug 2010 01:25 Link
/ sighs
A
Aaron Doolavay (White Giant)
15 Aug 2010 07:08 Link
if you can't be a super butt kisser what really is there left to live for?
T
TuCulo EsMio (Fearless Blue)
15 Aug 2010 08:02 Link
Lick the boots, in a super kind of way?
O
Orbiter (Little Upsilon)
15 Aug 2010 08:08 Link
using breath mints first?
O
Orbiter (Little Upsilon)
15 Aug 2010 08:12 Link
sorry chryso, it was just for the humor