G
General X (Fearless Blue)
11 Nov 2008 05:36
Link
I think it would be a good if we added biological weapons to the strategic list and improve our chemical weapons but still only for full members considering how much more powerful they will be.
We could have biological weapons such as small pox and Anthrax that if left unchecked in ones country the diseases would spread and possibly become a regional or world epidemic but if your country has a high health index then the disease may not spread so fast in your country or not many people will die also there would be biolical relief teams in the disaster menu that would try to clean these bacteria agents,i think that biological weapons should be probably the most expensive strategic weapons to decrease the chance of a trigger happy suicider.
chemical weapons on the other hand would be different whether your using mustard or nerve gas the weapons would rise to become a worldly or regional conflict but the may spread into the neighbors or countries that are around 2-3 countries away.unlike how chemical weapons are now if they were improved they wouldnt just disappear after one attack depending on weather patterns or downhill or uphill effect and wind and pollution the chemicals may spread into other parts of the country or possibly into the next few countries but only slight damage in the neighboring countries.
Both chemical and biological weapons wouldnt be used as weapons to damage infrastructure but to kill of populations only to be used at the desperated of times and biological weapons maybe only once in there membership do to there lethal damage on populace.
We could have biological weapons such as small pox and Anthrax that if left unchecked in ones country the diseases would spread and possibly become a regional or world epidemic but if your country has a high health index then the disease may not spread so fast in your country or not many people will die also there would be biolical relief teams in the disaster menu that would try to clean these bacteria agents,i think that biological weapons should be probably the most expensive strategic weapons to decrease the chance of a trigger happy suicider.
chemical weapons on the other hand would be different whether your using mustard or nerve gas the weapons would rise to become a worldly or regional conflict but the may spread into the neighbors or countries that are around 2-3 countries away.unlike how chemical weapons are now if they were improved they wouldnt just disappear after one attack depending on weather patterns or downhill or uphill effect and wind and pollution the chemicals may spread into other parts of the country or possibly into the next few countries but only slight damage in the neighboring countries.
Both chemical and biological weapons wouldnt be used as weapons to damage infrastructure but to kill of populations only to be used at the desperated of times and biological weapons maybe only once in there membership do to there lethal damage on populace.