W
Winter Sun
03 Dec 2013 19:28
Link
Hello! I have a suggestion for corporation quality, since I have seen a number of people complain about how the system works since I started playing.
The Problem and Summary of the Solution:
The problem: More things are produced at higher Q than is needed or ordered. We need to match buyer and seller at the right Q for the right price. The solution I propose is a slight alteration in the way final product Q and production volume work.
I suggest that these two should work together, so that when a corporation places high Q product on the market it can sell as EITHER the standard number of produced units at their actual quality OR an equivalent *value* or lower Q units (for example, 100 units of 200Q electric power could sell as 150 units of 150Q power - or whatever the correct math would be. Judge the concept, not my mathematics please).
Thus, quality would potentially affect volume sold depending on the world market situation, but it would not change the value of goods sold.
Hopefully this change will introduce a SLIGHT profitability to sales, but nothing unbalanced.
I think this would be a step in the right direction for the current product quality system. The GMs, at their discretion, may decide that only certain corporations can operate in this way. For instance, you can't really slice up a car, but you can certainly "water-down" almost all of the agricultural and food products produced at a high Q, same for services, same for utilities, mining (i.e., you can give someone a lot of ore, but not as refined even though it's the same value of metal in it).
Let me know what you think.
ADVANTAGES:
This would not affect the overall profitability of corporations, but it would help the market for both buyers AND sellers. I don't know if the GM currently subsidizes certain situations when there isn't an exact match for requested quality, but this essentially solves the issue if that happens.
This suggestion continues to encourage the development of high quality products.
I do not think the reverse procedure should be implemented (i.e. lower Q products should not combine and be sold as a lower volume of high Q).
Drawbacks:
Coding?
The Problem and Summary of the Solution:
The problem: More things are produced at higher Q than is needed or ordered. We need to match buyer and seller at the right Q for the right price. The solution I propose is a slight alteration in the way final product Q and production volume work.
I suggest that these two should work together, so that when a corporation places high Q product on the market it can sell as EITHER the standard number of produced units at their actual quality OR an equivalent *value* or lower Q units (for example, 100 units of 200Q electric power could sell as 150 units of 150Q power - or whatever the correct math would be. Judge the concept, not my mathematics please).
Thus, quality would potentially affect volume sold depending on the world market situation, but it would not change the value of goods sold.
Hopefully this change will introduce a SLIGHT profitability to sales, but nothing unbalanced.
I think this would be a step in the right direction for the current product quality system. The GMs, at their discretion, may decide that only certain corporations can operate in this way. For instance, you can't really slice up a car, but you can certainly "water-down" almost all of the agricultural and food products produced at a high Q, same for services, same for utilities, mining (i.e., you can give someone a lot of ore, but not as refined even though it's the same value of metal in it).
Let me know what you think.
ADVANTAGES:
This would not affect the overall profitability of corporations, but it would help the market for both buyers AND sellers. I don't know if the GM currently subsidizes certain situations when there isn't an exact match for requested quality, but this essentially solves the issue if that happens.
This suggestion continues to encourage the development of high quality products.
I do not think the reverse procedure should be implemented (i.e. lower Q products should not combine and be sold as a lower volume of high Q).
Drawbacks:
Coding?