W
whiteboy (Fearless Blue)
07 Jun 2010 06:15
Link
Windy is having a problem understanding the argument even though it has been explained to her 50 times by now. Just as you said Camulos...the choice would belong to the leader of the country when it came to what weapons should be deactivated. I can understand why that isn't possible but then I think we can ALL agree (even idiot) that it makes much more sense for offensive weapons to deact before defensive. First, because offensive require FAR MORE workers and second because it doesn't take a genius to say that no country is going to drop it's nuke defense before it drops it's heavy tanks...that's quite obvious. Little Ms. Idiot has an issue because first, she has no war capability outside of deccing with c3's and launching nukes (seriously) and second because she can't help but disagree with anything I say because she has been beaten down by me so many times through skillful contests that her greatest threat to me now is something like 'I know you are but what am I' or 'I'm rubber your glue, etc.' She is making up stupid arguments like 'you're stretching the game beyond what it is designed to do', as if she is one of the programmers in charge of the game. Then on top of that idiotic argument she is trying to make the point that *I* personally have an issue with stuffing too much military in my countries when she knows that isn't the case. I very rarely have worker issues and if/when they happen it is only after weeks of non-maintenance on my countries.
Anyway, this whole argument is stupid...there is zero reasonable argument for defense deactivating before offense so we're all just wasting our time here.
Anyway, this whole argument is stupid...there is zero reasonable argument for defense deactivating before offense so we're all just wasting our time here.