T
The Goldern Khan (Fearless Blue)
30 Jun 2009 15:23
Link
limits of weapons tranfers due to worker shortages-
Worker shortages can be fixed. Bans in general I think spoil the game. Maybe units/garrisons should have worker allocations like schools, and can only be deployed if workers are available. This would prevent the build up of weapons in countries that cant support them, but allow more control for the player to balance the work force. Also the banning of ammon transfer on the basis of worker shortages is a little strange. I think the $ transfer limit is suffiecient to prevent massive ammo transfer.
Reactivation-
This should be 10% of total forces rather than undeployed forces.
Air defense-
The idea that interceptors shoot down bombers rather than fighter is very biased. I think the poor pilots of our interceptors would rather shoot down the fighter thats going to kill them rather than the bomer that is going to kill somebody else. Maybe a % of both fighters and bomers should be attacked.
Worker shortages can be fixed. Bans in general I think spoil the game. Maybe units/garrisons should have worker allocations like schools, and can only be deployed if workers are available. This would prevent the build up of weapons in countries that cant support them, but allow more control for the player to balance the work force. Also the banning of ammon transfer on the basis of worker shortages is a little strange. I think the $ transfer limit is suffiecient to prevent massive ammo transfer.
Reactivation-
This should be 10% of total forces rather than undeployed forces.
Air defense-
The idea that interceptors shoot down bombers rather than fighter is very biased. I think the poor pilots of our interceptors would rather shoot down the fighter thats going to kill them rather than the bomer that is going to kill somebody else. Maybe a % of both fighters and bomers should be attacked.