U
Ummagumma (Little Upsilon)
25 May 2009 15:32
Link
After taking many years of data I have noticed that the data for the population and profit/loss do not reflect what you really get in game. Guess the GM is taking a little off the top, eh?
- You get about 50%-60% of the population stated in the (births/deaths) stat.
- Profit /loss really variable. Basically if says you are netting X billions a year, wou will get not get that ,but usually a percentage or even a loss!!!
- A sub note here about cost of ammo, if you add up all ammo used,military supplies,aircraft fuel,etc,etc EVERYTHING the military uses ,per month, it doesn't even come CLOSE to what is taken out on the cash change balance sheet.
I don't mind there being little differences (no one is perfect)but I get annoyed that on one page it shows that my country is making a healthy profit on a yearly basis and on the same page the cash available is declining on a yearly basis . This is not possible since the country would have to show a yearly loss on a least 1 of the years!! I have over 50 years of detailed data to back this all up. It can only be explained by the GM putting something else into the equation and leaving it off the screen for us to see. Perhaps it can be logically explained, I would just like to see it, not have a "fudge factor" applied.
- You get about 50%-60% of the population stated in the (births/deaths) stat.
- Profit /loss really variable. Basically if says you are netting X billions a year, wou will get not get that ,but usually a percentage or even a loss!!!
- A sub note here about cost of ammo, if you add up all ammo used,military supplies,aircraft fuel,etc,etc EVERYTHING the military uses ,per month, it doesn't even come CLOSE to what is taken out on the cash change balance sheet.
I don't mind there being little differences (no one is perfect)but I get annoyed that on one page it shows that my country is making a healthy profit on a yearly basis and on the same page the cash available is declining on a yearly basis . This is not possible since the country would have to show a yearly loss on a least 1 of the years!! I have over 50 years of detailed data to back this all up. It can only be explained by the GM putting something else into the equation and leaving it off the screen for us to see. Perhaps it can be logically explained, I would just like to see it, not have a "fudge factor" applied.