I would like it if you could define "in game actions" to me.
To me, in game actions do not include written language such as:
- "Tom Baker you can kiss my ***"
Elaborated: ***** = moran = moron. Hint or suggestion towards direct insult doesn't mask intention. The mere observation that the sentence could not be rewritten without the insult, whether implicit or explicit is bad.
- Poopthaigh, Broke Messiah
Or to start generalizing the thing:
- Sensationalist messages.
In game actions would seem to have a lot more... action than talking. But that's only my interpretation.
I did not precesily say I was going to ban you, but to clarify I will sharpen my attitude towards you and others in two weeks. What exactly I will do or begin depends on how this "collective behaviour" will evolve.
This isn't an ultimatum, this is a warning and it's particulary directed at you, simply because of chance. And also, because you you are the one beating the sticks.
Do you beleive what is happening now would continue if you were more complecent? Gone? Silent?
You may see it has a way resolve a problem from its root.
But you are correct, you shouldn't be the only warned. But like I said, you were warned because of chance - when the chance arrives, others will be warned - and one must begin somewhere.
<!-Quote-!>Quote:Its terrible that I am the one being threatened with a ban when most if not all of my responses that could be deemed offensive are almost always in response to some over the top comment by someone that you have failed to warn LG in the same way you have done with me. I keep it down, but when one goes on the attack at me, I respond in kind, where am I wrong? Same is the case in IRC, you freely let ameche BITCH CUNT BLA BLA and NEVER ONCE threaten him with a ban on IRC or forum, but I need to change my ways. Why is this more one sided than not? I am wondering?<!-/Quote-!>
This sort of reasoning of
the past justifies the present and
if he can, I can too is false.
None cannot be bounded by the mistakes of the pasts to correct the present.
Justice is independent of what others do. If I kill someone, would that mean everyone can?
Regarding IRC, I do not recall banning you or Ameche. I do remember kicking you because of nick stealing. However, I do recall setting the channel +m once, effectively stopping most of the members from speaking. After that, X became uncooperative. But I preferred to +m instead of +b to avoid... this. To avoid hurting someone emotionally and point fingers.
<!-Quote-!>Quote:This is a game that we all paid for. Opinions are expressed as needed. I have for one not provoked any of the nasty language on this forum, but I have responded to it. Thats BS str8 up LG. Do what you want as I know you will. But if they provoke me I will respond, but if you need to ban anyone make sure that its not only me. Because I certainly have NOT been the cause of the "Offensive material" but sure have been a healthy dose of reality. No matter who you are or how long you play no one has to take anyone elses crap without facing it themselves. This is cause and effect. Simple. They get all pissy because i wont let them rule like Gods in their imaginary worlds. But my money is and was as green as anyone elses who plays.<!-/Quote-!>
Right, right... But, again:
This sort of reasoning of
the past justifies the present and
if he can, I can too is false.
None cannot be bounded by the mistakes of the pasts to correct the present.
Justice is independent of what others do. If I kill someone, would that mean everyone can?
And indirectly or not, you are the cause. Things weren't not even this bad before you began.
If it feels of any confort to you, mission accomplished.
You lure them in when:
1.
https://www.simcountry.com/cgi-bin/discus/board-auth.cgi?file=/2/11200.html&lm=1229617977 2.
https://www.simcountry.com/cgi-bin/discus/board-auth.cgi?file=/2/11576.html&lm=1229791383 3.
https://www.simcountry.com/cgi-bin/discus/board-auth.cgi?file=/2/11200.html&lm=1229617977 4.
https://www.simcountry.com/cgi-bin/discus/board-auth.cgi?file=/2/10743.html&lm=1224823864 Care to state the purpose of those threads and justify when you don't run the risk of involving a new member into this.
<!-Quote-!>Quote:Because you double standards are so transparent that it reeks to the high heavens. I officially don't give a ****.<!-/Quote-!>
I wish to know what are my standards and what makes them double.
If you think others see you as the source of all evil... why is that?
By the way, if you really want to know what makes you and Hezekiah alike is the inability of understanding futility.