Simcountry
Forum Little Upsilon Committe Joint Chiefs of Staff of Regional Federations Legislative Pre-Proposals

Committe Joint Chiefs of Staff of Regional Federations Legislative Pre-Proposals

K
King Herod VI
11 Dec 2012 18:50 Link
From: Secretary of Little Upsilon Security


This post is for the use of all nations to bring None economic proposals to the table, and they will be taken up by your representatives of your regions on Little Upsilon. All Proposals are brought to the government site to be set up as an official Proposal, and then considered for floor debate by the Majority Leader. Once the proposal becomes a resolution and is debated on, it is then set up to be voted on. If passed, and signed by the Secretary of State, and Secretary General, it becomes a law. Please post all proposals here before they are considered.

Thank You

Department of Little Upsilon Security
K
King Hezekiah II
11 Dec 2012 19:02 Link
JCSR0001 Constitutional Amendment Articles of Impeachment Act

King Hezekiah II
Administrator

This proposal is to make a constitutional amendment about impeachment. There is no impeachment clause in the constitution. There should be an impeachment clause for the Secretary General. As states: The Secretary General will be impeached if they commit any act the Federation Legislature, Security Council, and Common Market Legislature deep impeachable. If articles of impeachment are passed in any chamber of the legislature, it is then sent to the LU International Ciminal Court, and if found guilty, the Secretary General will be impeached.
Please Majority Leader take this up, and bring it to the floor to be debated.
K
King Hezekiah II
11 Dec 2012 19:03 Link
JCSR0003 Million Person Minimum Military Personnel Act

King Hezekiah II
Administrator

This proposal is brought to allow by law all members of all federations of the Little Upsilon World Government should have a minimum of a million man military.
K
King Hezekiah II
11 Dec 2012 19:05 Link
JCSR0002 Constitutional Amendment Intergovernmental Peace Treaty

King Hezekiah II
Administrator

This proposal is brought to make a constitutional amendment that all members of the government should all sign security Council Peace Treaties. It is in my belief that government officials should not go to war with each other for any reason at all, unless passed by the Security Council, or Joint Chiefs.
K
King Hezekiah II
11 Dec 2012 19:05 Link
Thank you for setting this up like I asked. I appreciate you starting to come around.
K
King Herod VI
11 Dec 2012 19:21 Link
No big deal Hezekiah, Did you want me to post the Military Forum info, and the Economic Forum Info?
C
Crafty
11 Dec 2012 22:19 Link
New laws for your ever so peaceful democratic govt eh Hezz?

By law you must have 1M army

By law you must sign a peace treaty

Your officers are now impeachable through your govt branches which I presume you influence.

You sir are a madman. You are similar in policy to the many dictators in the middle east and African nations that are currently being overthrown by rebels.

Do you really not see the error of your ways?

I would like to welcome you to the game as an active bright player, but until you lose your ego...well, you aren't going to be welcomed by me.
C
Crafty
11 Dec 2012 22:21 Link
Oh, but thank you sincerely for having this post made in the LU forum. That honestly is appreciated.

And I wont hijack you again, maybe.
K
Keto
12 Dec 2012 00:18 Link
I smell a multi
J
Jiang Hu Warrior
12 Dec 2012 00:33 Link
keto dont even go their about multi asshats we know whom they are now- tis funny some vets are multi's
K
King Hezekiah II
14 Dec 2012 01:21 Link
These were all proposals that were brought to the floor for debate in our legislature. Jack has not taken up any of these measures as of yet to be signed into law. These are just proposals.
C
Crafty
14 Dec 2012 21:19 Link
Oh, I see.

And who proposed them, may I enquire Hez?
S
SweetPea
14 Dec 2012 22:45 Link
Join the site and find out Crafty. In the meantime Hezekiah, if you don't feed the trolls, they go and look for food elsewhere.
K
King Hezekiah II
15 Dec 2012 01:54 Link
lol @ wendy
C
Crafty
15 Dec 2012 17:48 Link
Do you not wish to answer Hez? It was a genuine innocent question.
S
shave
16 Dec 2012 02:41 Link
Hez! let me ask you this? what if someone does not want to be an expansionist or an isolationist? what if they find them selves some where in between? or even with a differing view all together? do they get to have a voice in things, or an opportunity to run for an office? or are they to be repressed? it would seem to me they should have the opportunity to create their own platform or party. and with that hold all the rights and privileges of the other two Major Parties. :)

this seems to be the right forum for this question. :)
S
shave
16 Dec 2012 03:17 Link
let me be a little more clear about what I am getting at. I am not an Isolationist, at least not completely anyway, in that I believe that there is a time to fight for a just cause. I also do believe in the importance of an international community that works together to create a free and sustainable world for all. I believe in the rule of Law, to where it does not infringe upon the freedom of others to live their own lives, and their right to protect themselves and their interests. however, It must also protect the lives and interests of its own commonalities. that being said, I believe their is something called universal Justice. pertaining to things such as Genocide, environmental instability, the inhumane treatment and oppression of other human beings. things that can not go unchecked and unhindered. things that are bad for everyone universally. this would require on some level a peace keeping force, or a global military of sorts. this is exceptable. however!!!! at the very heart of it all, must be a democratically elected government that is chosen by the people, and for the people. a representative of ALL the people. and thereby an opportunity to elect someone into power that represents all of the viewpoints of it's people.there must be a written and judicially backed legislative content or Law if you will, that all the people including the government must abide by, or face prosecution and impeachment in some cases. it can not be a situation where so many grey area's exist, and someone sits upon a throne of sorts, having access to his or her own army to command at whim. in limiting the amount of parties, you effectively block the ability for the whole of the body to grow democratically and morally as its people may take it. by limiting the system to 2 ideologies you force the other voices to be silenced. and thereby it is no longer a truly free endeavor. and that wouldn't work for me.....just some food for thought. :)

and yes Ms. Wendy , b4 you say it. I know! it makes no sense! lol Cheers! :)