NLUO: Notice of Intent

Due to some recent hostile bids on a member of the NLUO, the members have decided to pursue a vote to pass a resolution to bring a boycott against Gaz.

The vote has not commenced but there are 10 member nations I counted willing to support the measure.

If Gaz is willing, I am open to discussing a way to end this problem and avoid it in the future if he would like to. I would like to keep such a discussion private for obvious reasons.

I will not comment on this issue again unless Gaz and the NLUO come to some preventative resolution or the measure is passed.

It is my sincere hope that Gaz come to the table.

It has also been brought up in conversation that Crafty is nationalizing another of our member's corps. This saddens us, especially considering how well we were getting along. Did you really intend to move our conversations past debate CC and resort to taking Lee's corps? We have avoided escalating things with you. Why the nationalization? Lee is a good player. It is senseless and provocative.

If you'd like to keep the discussion private, did it ever occur to you that posting on the forums is counter-productive?

Did it ever occur to you that I meant no comment.

"No comment."

Making a post to say, "no comment," is in itself commenting, is it not?

I don't know, is it?

"NO Comment"

This is BS. I was the one who was hostile bid in the first place so I will not be "coming to the table" Boycott me all you like. It wont do you's any good.

I'd like to know who these 10 players are?

Prob wendy and her mult accounts

She has no multi-accounts. It is frowned upon by the international community, and the game masters. It is also frowned upon by our government, and may be prosecuted for those actions.

@ Gaz Do you have any proof? If you have proof I stand corrected.

I could ask the GM's to clear this up but I dont want to waste there time with some petty issue.

Anyway I already proved you weren't the owner of the corp in another thread. Isn't that good enough for you? You can play dumb all you like Hez. I aint buying it. You know you bid on it.

My guess is this was done so you's could justify your aggresion towards me, and keep the attention on the NLUO.

Now Wendy has started bidding on my corps lol.

This is not the intent. I am not playing dumb. I wish I could bring up the PM. I hate how the game deletes your pms. I also wish there was a sent category for your pms too. This way we would not have to worry with the GMs in this matter.

Im way past caring anyway. My position is clear. You wanted to provoke aggresion from me, you got it.

I was not provoking any aggression. I apologized if it was your corp. I never believed it was your corp, but you said it was. I just wish I would have paid more attention. But what is obvious, you bid on my corp. You said you were on holiday, and if you got bid on, then would have it not been in both of our best interests to speak on the matter before you bid on the corp?

Lmao. You stole the corp from me and I have to ask permission to take it back? I dont think so.

As soon as you bid on the corp, I emailed you about it. I would have returned it to you if you would have just emailed me and said, Hey you bid on my corp. Instead, you just bid on the corp. Now who is actually in the wrong here either way it goes?

I did not steal anything. You have no proof. This is why I said that you did that to provoke Wendy because of the beef you have with her, and using me as a pawn to attack her.

I proved you weren't the owner of the corp in the first place.

To prove the corp was mine in the first place. Take a look at my nuke industry in my ent. All the corps have been setup at the same time. I think thats proof enough.

Obviously you'll disagree because you dont have the integrity to own up to being wrong.

If you think that I'd bid on corps to get to Wendy your way off. I wouldnt lower myself to that.

17 POSTS!!

Ok Gaz. I tried to be cordial. The vote will proceed to the best of my knowledge. Should you care to escalate this personally with me, I am open to options.

Ok so to try and put this to bed I've contacted the GM's to ask them to check there logs. I doubt they'll reply though, we'll see.

Why would they waste their time with that? Even if they did, how does this change the bids, the poor form by not responding to the messages Hezekiah sent you? When he allegedly bid on your corp initially, did you message him? Assuming that is what actually happened in the first place?

The point is this could have been worked out diplomatically in the first place. Like this could have been sorted out diplomatically once you started bidding and I asked you to come to the table.

This issue won't be put to bed through the gm, I prefer if we as players could exercise a bit of diplomacy here. So nix your emotions and let's start over. We can discuss this in chat. I will go there for a while. Please meet me there and we can try to work this out.

My concern is not about what has happened in the past, but preventing this in the future. Are you game?

Once this is settled I can begin to try to mend fences with Crafty, who appears to have nationalized two or more of Lee's corporations. To think I offered him a dance.

Actaully I did send him a meassge as soon as I noticed his bid. Not to say I was taking the corp back , but to ask him what the hell's he playing at? Obviously i'd take it back, wouldnt you?

Im open to negoiate with you Wendy, as far as im concerened were still at war. This issue with Hez i a different matter though. Untill he owns up and apoligises I aint budging.

No we aren't at war, you are at war with yourself. Me? I'm chillin'. Not sure what you call a war, but whatever is or isn't happening right now isn't it.

Were not? So your hostile bids are just for fun then?

So who's the 10 players lined up to boycott me? I think I have a right to know.

They were bids, have I gained any corporations yet? This is similar to the concept of declarations don't always lead to shots being fired.

Why do you think you have a right to know lol? If the gamemasters thought so, they would have made that open information as part of the boycott process. Personally speaking though, I am actually on your side on this one. I wish I knew who boycotted me all those times when I first started.

You should be more interested in working this out. we should be in chat having this conversation. The forum only adds to the communication problem. Come, have a sit with me.