Unprovoked sneak attack (Little Upsilon)

Ah. Thanks for the quote Sam. Anyway, I take it that you are the agressor here Wendy? As a neutral bystander, surely that if an innocent country is attacked, they have the right to either defend themselves or offer peace on their terms? The agressor in any situation should not be able to dictate peace terms, but should wait and see what is offered or agreed to, unless they have been continuously proveked. Have you been continiously provoked Wendy?

Anyway, all this talk of nulti's came because of the decs? Come on guys n' gals.....lets all take a chill pill and sit down and have cookies together

No Stu. . . again you are brown nosing the vet public, i made no such demands for any peace terms, they were offered. He cried about me attacking an innocent player, which is why I offered, claiming that I even continue to attack, which is false.

Did i ask or demand to "Dictate terms", NO I offered and said I would be willing to negotiate. Agressor, defender, is no difference, if you want to come to the table then it is open for about a small while.

Now Stu if you aren't attempting to help the poor guy get peace, don't spam with nonsense claiming some moral high ground. This is SC war is a part of the game, He should be thankful, I have enlightened him to the weakness' and how close he came to total defeat very quickly. Im sure the vet crewis helping him, and he is rebuilding a more substantial defense that will be a proper challenge to break through. Don't be rash and think, that I didn't take the country because I didn't want to. I simply am confined to the limitations of the c3s that were designated for the attack. Had my intentions been to take the country, and had I even really tried, it would have come quite easily. That could change, so again, I offer a hand at peace. Of course still he has not confirmed nor denied a wish to pursue either a course of war or peace.

Stu your Nobel . . . I just threw it in the garbage. . . haha. Just messin.

Firstly, i'm not brown nosing anyone. I'm just trying to sort this out.

Yes, I admit that you did offer peace terms, and that you were willing to stop the fight straight away. BUT then you said that if they were not accepted the next offer would be under force, and that is an obvious threat. I don't know how to do the quote thingy, or I would have put it here!

Wendy and Phatz, I ask that you refrain from any further attacks on each other and agree to an immediate cease fire. I will work with you both to secure a lasting peace.

One last question Wendy, if you didn't intend on taking the country, why did you attack it?

NOW EAT COOKIES!!!!!

I think the reason was obvious many posts ago.

But here is less dramatic approach . . .

To test the weapons and help the young man avoid financial fees of course! Duh!

lol. OK Wendy, but did you do it with his consent? Judging by the above posts the answer to that is no. I'm sure a friendly message to his main would have been easier for the rest of us on the eyes, and not cause me to want to throw my laptop out of the window.

I don't know why you would want to do a weapons test anyway, they work. This is SC and they don't fail like in RL. Still, surely you would have been better trying it out on a C3 instead?

If it was the range of the weapons that you wanted to test, how destructive they are, or what units you can use a particular weapon against, you can find all this information in the documentation. And it would have saved me typing

And I want my nobel back!!!!!

I'm pretty sure this was about him being a multi if i read your posts correctly

The investigative board is doing an ethics inquiry into your nomination for such an award. . . the judgment is held in lieu of its final decision. . . sorry its out of my hands

The weapons test was valid, I did give him a simple offer of peace, which he responded to with counter attacks.

Consent for war is only needed by me from my citizens, and they know better than to disagree with me.

The weapons test was a secondary reason, my primary reason, which is irrelevant now, was his trial in The High Court Tribunal System and subsequent conviction, honestly I wish I could have followed another course of action but the judgment was decreed, and therefore had to be carried out by rule of ShcyzMattiCaL Law. . . my hands were tied.

So, he was tried in the court with you as Judge, Jury and executioner?

Very fair. For a Jewish person to be doing something similar to Sharia law is really quite remarkable!

Your citizens know better than to disagree with you?

Sounds rather dictatorial. Perhaps we should call you Stalin. Or Hitler. LH perhaps?????? lol

The investigative board is doing an investigation?

I suppose the board has one member dosn't it? You

lol Wendy, you still manage to make me laugh even after all these months!!!

HAHA. . . but

"Very fair. For a Jewish person to be doing something similar to Sharia law is really quite remarkable!"

This comment was very unfair, while you may not agree with this system of govt or religious laws, this was a poor comparison on your part and extremely unfair to Islam. I respect the sanctity of religion, especially Islam and Judaism in particular.

Sharia is a system that has worked for centuries, while we on the west may not agree with its implementation, it is a valid judicial system. Its validity is attested to by the low crime rates in most modern Islamic nations, and high moral values still present in the "Normal" Islamic lands. Extremism is something totally different, and the two should not be confused nor compared.

I do run a dictatorship, Stalin, Hitler are no comparison to me, they are like babes' in my midst. I would Pwn them without delay.

lmao.

Wendy, true Sharia law is only used in one modern muslim state, and that is Iran. The low crime rate in the other Islamic countries is probably because of a low detection level.

Anyway, my previous post wasn't intended to be in any means offensive, but if anyone finds it as such I humbly apologise. So there.

Still, back to business. Lets get a full cease fire going then folks. Wendy, he was well within his rights to launch a counter offensive. Most people would. But, lets stop this now before the conflict grows to include other players.

Do both parties agree to a cease fire? If you do, I will allow you all 2 cookies each, and may even throw in some cool milk too.....

"Wendy, true Sharia law is only used in one modern muslim state, and that is Iran. The low crime rate in the other Islamic countries is probably because of a low detection level."

False. . .now don't make me google the facts. I am very informed on many aspects of Islamic Religion and culture.

Sharia is only a term used to describe a more strict implementation and interpretation of what the Koran says IS law, and the Koran followed by ALL muslims. To stop you in your tracks and save me time googling. . . I will give you a fun fact. There is an entire community of Muslim people, who in fact want to get a ballot measure to make sharia Law , THE LAW in a very large portion or area in a city or county in I believe Minnesota. This was big on CNN as it threatened to by rule of our constitution allow such a ballot measure with adequate number of signatures needed, allow a vote which would be undoubtedly won by vote, and bringing Sharia as the Law of the area in question. The true story behind it was how this alarmed washington, because they wanted to somehow stop the measure but would have to violate the local standing Laws on ballot measures and undermine the constitutional value of a majority rule by the people. So there was much speak, at least in America about this issue. I fail to see how you could be compelled to believe that if Muslim people in this country are pushing for sharia to become the law in their community, how could there not be a single other Islamic country that does not adhere to sharia interpretation of Islamic Law as stated in the Koran.

For your information, Sharia law is used throughout the middle east, especially Saudi Arabia which is probably worse than Iran. I'm currently living in Saudi Arabia and i've experienced true Sharia enforcement by the "muttawa", the saudi religious police. They have the right to do anything; bash and imprison anyone who disobeys their demands. For example, im not allowed to wear shorts in the malls because it shows my bare legs (but i still wear shorts; bit of a risk). Another example of this sharia law is the fact that crimes are not taken lightly here at all. For robbery - amputation of the left hand; for murder, rape, and insults to islam - decapitation by sword. The really horrible aspect of this is that anyone can witness these punishments every friday in a special place (i've never, and will never go there). By the way, i'm not Saudi, but an Australian expat just to let people know.

Wait. I'm confused. Am I Dragoon? Or is Dub Dragoon? Or am I Dub? If I can choose I would wanna be Ameche I think, unless I could be Laguna, because it seems like being Laguna could be a lot of fun too. Will someone please explain to me who I am before I start playing again?

What?... No one is a multi here.

Well, she is a laugh a minute...

Stuart, it is her imaginary evidence in her imaginary court with her as the imaginary judge that started this. Her first excuse was that I was a multi of Sam's (her imagination), she offers peace after 2 days of attacks and I said I want compensation and a apology for her unjustly attacking an innocent player. When I see her offers we can talk.

I've never spoken to her before her sneak attacks late Sunday night. She has attacked me daily with the excuse that I fought back, lol more of her imagination. I returned one of the 14+ nukes she used on me with zero damage to her and then I wiped out her 7 SF units that were painting my country. Now that's what I call fighting back. I have not attacked any of her 5 countries.

/facepalm

is all this needed

Wendy has gone rather quiet I see. Accusations no longer work?

She has attacked me daily with the excuse that I fought back, lol more of her imagination. I returned one of the 14+ nukes she used on me with zero damage to her and then I wiped out her 7 SF units that were painting my country. Now that's what I call fighting back.

OMG are you serious dude?

Today is Tuesday!!! The decs didn't even go live until yesterday afternoon. Wth are you talkin about daily attacks? You wiped out 7 SF units? . . .Way to go LMAO!

If thats what you call fighting back then good luck to you my friend. Enough Spamming you want peace or not?

Wendy has gone rather quiet I see. Accusations no longer work?

Maybe thats because I went shopping? DUH!! Maybe you should try once in a while.

This thread amuses me.

I find I can laugh at it in much the same way as Camus makes me laugh. Or Kafka.

LMAO!

Stuart, it is her imaginary evidence in her imaginary court with her as the imaginary judge that started this. Her first excuse was that I was a multi of Sam's (her imagination), she offers peace after 2 days of attacks and I said I want compensation and a apology for her unjustly attacking an innocent player. When I see her offers we can talk.


OOOOKAAAYYY /i missed this part sorry for reading too fast. . .

Phatz you are truly phunny.

I told you NO negotiations unless a cease fire is arranged, Which you haven't agreed to formally. I didn't do much damage, so what do you think is fair? And then we shall see how good you are at diplomacy.

/me floats on by in a bucket of coal

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

John R
Tuesday, January 6, 2009 - 10:39 pm Click here to edit this post What?... No one is a multi here.<!-/Quote-!>

Apologize. Sincere. Jack Frost. Dub. Phatz. and Me.

Or continue to look like a fool instead of a reasonable intelligent woman. Either way I am golden.

Apologize. Sincere. Jack Frost. Dub. Phatz. and Me.

NO, NO AGAIN, Thought about it, and NEVER.

Thx