Simcountry
Forum General W3C - Game news Oct. 28

W3C - Game news Oct. 28

P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
01 Nov 2010 21:40 Link
Hmmm.. Excellent suggestions CC. I think you are onto something big here.
M
Maestro2000 (Golden Rainbow)
01 Nov 2010 21:59 Link
CC

My suggestion is only to sweep excess cash to your direct account.

I do agree with you in principal on automation of the space program. We don't pay an extra charge to move our goods between countries. Why should we pay for moving goods between worlds?

The rest of your comments I'll leave alone for the moment.
N
nix001 (Little Upsilon)
01 Nov 2010 21:59 Link
As long as they dont take away my click to Nuke you Crafty ;)

Whats up Crafty? You seem a little stressed.

Hi Maestro2000. I think the charge is a good idea. Why would the GM want to encourage polluting the atmosphere even more than we have too? ;) Its not as-if we cant produce whats required on each of the planets. Profit should not come before our futures environment. Sure, if you need something urgent like NUKES space travel them. I would'nt mind paying a charge to The Masters of the Universe to move my Nukes or even workers around.

Peace&Hardcore................Nix001
Mother Nature Cryz

Dam I feel a rant coming on.........GM......Whats with only being able to attack one C3 at a time? :(
Ok just read your gonna fix it :)

Also you have removed the function where you dont have to go to your list of countries to be able to go to one of your countrys. Like a worker transfer. Before we could, from the worker transfer page, just click on the empire country that we have sent the worker swap too and we would be in that country with full control over it. Same with the map. Before we could be in control of one country, then goto the map, click on another empire country and it put us in control of that country.
Where now we have gone back to the old way of having to go back into the list of our countries and click on the country that we want to goto before we have control over it. Long!
L
Laguna
01 Nov 2010 22:07 Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

Excessive cash balances:

Could a feature be added to sweep excess country cash balances to the players direct account?

This would help the player avoid unwanted finance charges.

I think Laguna for one would give you an open mouth kiss for this upgrade<!-/Quote-!>


The opportunity cost of money, like all normal goods, decreases with quantity. That's why, at this level, it doesn't bother me all that much that I lose a few trillions per day when I don't log in.

A less bureaucratic approach would be removing financial fees completely. Or, to make me happy, redirect the collected fees to the Security Councils Funds. KB's Council will run out of money at this rate.

<!-Quote-!>Quote:

The open mouth kiss is not an option.<!-/Quote-!>


Indeed it isn't.
K
Keto (Little Upsilon)
01 Nov 2010 22:33 Link
If we make the whole game automatic, whats the sense in playing? We would seldom log in. Part of the fun is to log on and perform some routine maintenance to our empires, while watching the results of our clicks.
M
Maestro2000 (Little Upsilon)
02 Nov 2010 01:42 Link
I log in ...often


And make thousands of clicks every day. The clicks I was looking to remove by automating the country/ceo cash balance level is a tiny fraction of my total clicks on a daily basis...(and I'm sure the same holds true for the lending institutions Laguna runs on all worlds) The clicking is pure nonsense time.

Lg,
If not removed, I do like your idea of redirecting the fees to the security council fund.
O
Orbiter (White Giant)
03 Nov 2010 05:17 Link
Sorry, your country cannot be involved in more than 1 war against countries without a president.

i know you guys are working on it, just a bump to keep it active
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
03 Nov 2010 05:33 Link
*Sighs* I wonder why they would change it now? And what exactly is wrong with attacking one c3 at a time?

This IS what you guys wanted, right?
T
Tom Willard (White Giant)
03 Nov 2010 14:17 Link
If someone has the time, the will and the weapons to fight more wars at the same time, why should we forbid?

As long as you win the war yourself and not with the help of many others.

we love to find a limitation that is not needed and remove it.
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
03 Nov 2010 14:59 Link
Ok Tom, so why should we have ever tried to limit sneak attacks, and limit c3 decs to 4 in the past, or limit how wars are being fought now and in the past? That is kind of a rhetorical response. Now you've hurt my feelings. :(

I find your response interesting, because I reported that over a month ago on more than one thread while you were active with other updates and you didn't look twice. I'm sure you were busy, or was aware it changed and understood why it happened. Certainly it didn't happen accidentally.

Then again, stranger things have happened. Let me end here, I don't wanna earthquake myself...lol just kidding.
O
Orbiter (Kebir Blue)
03 Nov 2010 17:21 Link
the 4 at one time, i thought you'd remember y, on that one.

lets see, some one had a brilliant idea... it was organize a couple feds on GR, they dec'd and maintained wars against every C3 on GR, so no new players could sign up for GR, and thus have some sort of leverage over W3C, to make them do, or not do what those players wanted. as many people were frustrated over changes at the time...

W3C changed the max c3 dec limit, from unlimited at the time, to 5, (one more than 4...)

atleast, thats how i remember it.
N
nix001
03 Nov 2010 17:54 Link
Come on Mr T sort it out. I have a war to fight :0
Did you look at my post? Why have you changed how we can go from one empire country to another?

Nix001
Mother Nature Cryz
C
Cao Yi (Fearless Blue)
08 Nov 2010 18:14 Link
My public corporation has over 200B in it, and i hold 85% shares of it. I want to know how to take some money from my percentage then i can do other things for my country.
C
Cao Yi (Fearless Blue)
08 Nov 2010 18:45 Link
In order to gain interesting playing SC game for players, GM should respect players by giving an option which players can contact Administration. I have no idea how to get correct answers. For example: Many players give me different solutions to fix the same problem, and it turns out that their advices do not work on my country( my country is lacking of HT Excutive. The more I increase its priority, the more my country needs HT Excutive). I am Bold
S
Serpent (Fearless Blue)
08 Nov 2010 21:25 Link
I sent you a worker exchange for 25,000 HTex. That should fix that problem.
C
Cao Yi (Fearless Blue)
08 Nov 2010 21:39 Link
Serpent, you are so kind to me. Thank you very much. I am lacking of all HT workers. But having a lot of HT Excutive from you, I can improve other HT workers. It takes time. However, thank you SERPENT
P
Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon)
09 Nov 2010 04:59 Link
The reason you have shortages is because of all the adjustments to the recent corporation worker requirements. Under normal circumstances all the solutions provided to you by the player would work. But the changes are independent of normal game mechanics and will upset your workers regardless of what you do.

Be patient, wait it out, and continue accepting advice from players. It is better than the docs will ever be. I find that amusing but admit it does force people to enter chat to find out what the heck is going on exactly.
L
Laguna
09 Nov 2010 16:27 Link
<!-Quote-!>Quote:

GM should respect players by giving an option which players can contact Administration.<!-/Quote-!>


If you look at your country's left menu, you'll see an option named "Contact Us". The same option is available on the Portal.