T
Teddy Bear
03 Jun 2013 14:57
Link
Hi Guys,
I asked this question of WC3 in another thread, but there was no response, so ill ask again.
We all now know that accepting any award for any country or CEO on any world decreases your score for all your countries or CEO's on ALL worlds.
WC3 stated that the aim of the new score system was so that more awards were handed out, and to a wider range of players.
My question is this. If all the players who were the top scorers, now have to refuse an award month after month until they reach the top award which is automatically accepted, and the refused awards aren't passed down to the next person in the rankings, then isn't the actual situation we have now that most of the top 10 awards will be refused and WC3 will be paying out less awards?
So in addition to making our scores unclear, not thinking this through has actually caused the opposite of the objective.
Anyone have thoughts on this please?
Thank for your time
Teddy
I asked this question of WC3 in another thread, but there was no response, so ill ask again.
We all now know that accepting any award for any country or CEO on any world decreases your score for all your countries or CEO's on ALL worlds.
WC3 stated that the aim of the new score system was so that more awards were handed out, and to a wider range of players.
My question is this. If all the players who were the top scorers, now have to refuse an award month after month until they reach the top award which is automatically accepted, and the refused awards aren't passed down to the next person in the rankings, then isn't the actual situation we have now that most of the top 10 awards will be refused and WC3 will be paying out less awards?
So in addition to making our scores unclear, not thinking this through has actually caused the opposite of the objective.
Anyone have thoughts on this please?
Thank for your time
Teddy