The Supreme Court of Evil Woody Thoughts has received the following communication from the Prosecutor of the Little Upsilon International Court.
------------------------------
From: United Israelite Empire
To: Evil Woody Thoughts 0 CEO tax
Real Date: 02-03-2009 15:33:14
World Date: May 03 2385
Subject: Re: Re: Summons to LU Interantional Court
Message: I will get this info to the Justices of the Peace, and see what they rule on this matter. Thank you for your reply upon the summons summitted to you. I will see if they are interested in Quashing the Summons and charges. I will get back to you before the court date.
--------------------------
This communication is not in compliance with the Court's instructions, as it fails to assert jurisdiction over the cause of action, and therefore the Supreme Court of Evil Woody Thoughts must reject aforesaid brief. Because the deadline has not yet passed, we will reiterate our instructions and allow the Prosecutor of the New Little Upsilon International Court to file an amended response to complaint:
Upon receipt of writ of summons, Prime Minister Keith Allaire has filed a motion to dismiss with the Supreme Court of Evil Woody Thoughts, alleging a lack of jurisdiction on the part of the LU International Court. Prime Minister Allaire has entered a complaint that claims the defense of sovereign immunity as head of state. In addition, the Prime Minister pleads that the charges brought against him are not justiciable because they represent a political question. Therefore he has petitioned the Supreme Court of Evil Woody Thoughts to quash the summons. The Supreme Court of Evil Woody Thoughts will rule on this question no later than 4 March 2009.
The New Little Upsilon Order is invited to submit a legal brief or pleading answering the complaint and explaining what personal jurisdiction, and on what grounds, it claims over the Prime Minister. Failure to do so may result in a default judgment against the NLUO. The NLUO has 48 hours to respond.
------------------------
It is not the responsibility of the Justices to format legal arguments for pretrial motions. That responsibility falls to the Prosecutor.