C
Crafty
18 Sep 2012 16:17
Link
Seems counter-intuitive doesn't it?
Well look at this.
I built a corp (state) about a game year ago.
I have SS at 80% (102 index).
The building of this corps financial considerations...
A total workforce income drop of $1.15 B
An individual LLW income drop of $300
Hence a tax income drop of $660M
a health contribution drop of $280M
an education contribution drop of $185M
Private investments down $70M divi down $30M
Pension contributions down $21M
(each pensioner receives $4 less a month)
A gain in saving $360M on the SS bill.
So my math says:
Gain = $360M
Losses = $1.155B
Overall outcome = $-795M
For one corp, thats going to have to be a nice corp to cover that every month and profit the country.
So I wonder, where is the flaw in my thinking?
Should I maybe reduce SS or raise salaries, knowing this will effect welfare in country and corps?
I would have thought with SS at only 80% of LLW salary the opposite of what I am observing should be happening, but the figures are there.
And whats even more bizarre is that this new corp has a salary level of 300 compared to a national average of 275 :/
So now it's time for ME to pick YOUR brains.
Whats up?
Well look at this.
I built a corp (state) about a game year ago.
I have SS at 80% (102 index).
The building of this corps financial considerations...
A total workforce income drop of $1.15 B
An individual LLW income drop of $300
Hence a tax income drop of $660M
a health contribution drop of $280M
an education contribution drop of $185M
Private investments down $70M divi down $30M
Pension contributions down $21M
(each pensioner receives $4 less a month)
A gain in saving $360M on the SS bill.
So my math says:
Gain = $360M
Losses = $1.155B
Overall outcome = $-795M
For one corp, thats going to have to be a nice corp to cover that every month and profit the country.
So I wonder, where is the flaw in my thinking?
Should I maybe reduce SS or raise salaries, knowing this will effect welfare in country and corps?
I would have thought with SS at only 80% of LLW salary the opposite of what I am observing should be happening, but the figures are there.
And whats even more bizarre is that this new corp has a salary level of 300 compared to a national average of 275 :/
So now it's time for ME to pick YOUR brains.
Whats up?