Is Nuclear Power designed to be a viable corp? (Little Upsilon)

?

I know DG, gives it all that and then tries to give it some more. I think he just wants a fight. I've seen more of a point on a ball.

'It's amazing what a clever programmer can do without anyone ever finding out.' Hack the program Trahx, I don't care.
Whats with all the insults anyway Trahx? Did your momma never teach you any manners? As I said 'shame' I would have rather battled with words than missiles. As soon as I've taken your slave I'll answer any question or statement you have. Unless of course you insult me again. Then I'll just get a mate to take over a country next to your main and nuke it 10 times a day.

Last but not least. I pointed this out earlier. This kind of chat should be on the environmental threads.

Ok, one more thing. What is it that you don't agree with me about?

Nix, not all of us are going to sit by and let you dec on new players just because they don't agree with you and your agenda.

What agenda are you on about BC? I will not sit here and let some one insult those who care about our futures environment. I did warn him. Read BC Read. If you had done so, you would understand what is going on. But if you wish to join in with the fun and games then be my guest. I have one target, we'll 2 if CC wishes to get his ass kicked again, OH yea CC, no lame excuse this time when I've destroyed your air defence and my troops start painting your country. To the death this time.

I always wondered about this BC kid.

Looks like hes all grown up now.

I don't agree with BC or his agenda.

CONSPIRACY!!!!!!!

LOL, wendy, you're the self proclaimed defender of the new player. Thats all BC and I are agreeing with, defending a newbie from nixs attacks on him for exercising his right to free speech.
This isnt an anti-enviromentalist arguement, just a stance against bullying of new players.

P.S.

Nix, you could have done better with a name for your second account, Mr. Gardener? come on...
Oh, go on, its your neighbour, or a friend, right...
No one day old player has the ability to paint a C3 like he is, its a *CONSPIRACY*!!!

"You can't convince a believer of anything; for their belief is not based on evidence, it's based on a deep-seated need to believe."

Nix all over. His brief flirtatins with "scientific fact" came to an end once they countradicted his world view.

Nix "believes" in man-made global warming. Ergo, it must be true - science and study be damned. He just enjoys playing the selfless martyr.

I was at a party last night and a mate said a quote from an American Indian. 'Only once the last tree has been cut down and the last fish has been caught will we realise you cant eat money'

This is not the same situation as last time where I went to War with Crafty and inturn with The Coalition of Capitalistic Tree Haters. That time was due to Crafty's complete denial of any risk human activity poses on our future generations environment(which he did to provoke me into a fight. The war was stopped due to him admitting that he is concerned about Mother Nature, but just didn't know what we could do about it).

This is to with Trahx's insults towards those who care about our impact on Mother Nature. 'environmentalist nutjobs' he called us.
I replied on Tuesday, April 6, 2010 - 09:04 pm (have a look at it). Then Trahx made a point of saying it again on his next post. I do not consider insults to be a right of free speech. You insult someone expect them to respond.

4 on 1 is nothing new to me, but I see you and BC have made the same mistake as The Coalition of Capitalist Tree Haters did, you've gone for my mains and left the target alone. I would have thought after what happened to you on KB Crafty you would have thought about that one. I'm guessing protection of a fellow noob is the last thing on your minds. Maybe it's revenge for KB or maybe your just on the rob like the 2 Ronnies were. Either way, like last time, it's gonna be fun.

War&Hardcore...............Nix001
MNA

I defend Trahx's right to call you a nutjob. Nutjob, in this instance, being defined as an individual holding unfounded extremist views.

You are a nutjob. It is not an insult; it is a statement of fact. We do not fear facts as you do.

Hi Katt, I saw your navy there. I know how you think about the problem we are leaving our children with........you don't.

Maybe your scared to or maybe you just don't care.
I can understand you being scared as it is a very scary thought. But to not care............now thats a nutjob.

I trust in science, nix, and build my opinion based upon facts presented to me by credible, thoroughly-tested, peer-reviewed material, and organised by a mind well-versed in the sciences.

You, on the other hand, are an alarmist who is clearly scared of anything that moves. You are irrational and completely incapable of reason thought or dialogue.

I truly pity you.

I will drop my words here. They can serve no further purpose and you are beyond my ability to educate.

I agree that everybody is insulting. But you are using the same bullying script as before:

"Mother Natures Army will not tolerate this disrespectful attitude towards those who care about Mother Natures well being and survival."

and

"Ok....... First I'm gonna kick your ass, then I'll show you the errors in your thinking.

You want to play Russian roulette with our futures environment, I'm gonna load the gun."

The insults are petty and I SERIOUSLY doubt that anybody here is anti-environment. That's ridiculous. So, I defend Trahx for the bullying, not because I agree with either of your way of thinking.

BC

Katt. Doood 'thoroughly-tested' Yea, we have thoroughly tested the effects of man on the eco-system and we have come up with the concluction we have destroyed it.
What use is that? Thats like saying we will pour acid into the pond, then do some tests to see if it will kill all the fish.
Then if all the fish have died we will know it was not the right thing to do.

Thats fine BC. I have no problem with you jumping to the aid of someone who insits on insulting those who would rather change our lifestyles than see the Eco-system die. But you have chosen what side of the fence you are on.
'I SERIOUSLY doubt that anybody here is anti-environment' well if trahx, like Crafty, admits this then, like Crafty I have no problem. But if he does'nt admit it and stands by his words that mans destruction of the environment is nothing to be worried about then you'll see that there are people out there who are anti-environmental and need to be made to see that their influence is creating alot of problems for those who are trying to sort the Eco-system out.

*Yawn*

You're such a bore nix.

Thats what comes of attacking Econ slaves. #flash back to KB#
But as you know Crafty from KB, I hav'nt started yet.
Once I've made my point to Trahx I'll call for you.

The Forces of Nature are knocking on Trahx's slaves door. I suggest you 2 get over there asap. Unless of course you 2 were just on the rob.

Oh yea BC. Its not anti-environmental its Anti-environmentalist. Maybe that's where you are getting confused. I know there are a few people out there who destroy the Eco-system and would be quite happy to live in an Eco bubble if the Eco-system was to collapse, so I guess you could call them anti-environmental. But the majority, like Trahx, are just anti-environmentalist.

I never thought a game thread would take this direction, but it has and it demands a response, regrettably.

To equate the rejection of an unproven and falsified theory as being "anti-environmental" is illogical, irrational and unscientific. A theory that requires falsified data, deliberate sabotage of the peer review process and political chicanery to survive demands exposure of the perpetrators and those who blindly support its promotion. Call them environmentalists, greeners, or whatever you will, but the leap of faith they have taken clearly identifies them as "nutjobs". My only objection when first posting in this thread was that environmental religionists not co-op the game to promote a discredited theory as reality. The game has enough problems with reality without adding more.

In my profession as a fire protection engineer, I have done more to protect the environment, property and people's lives than most of the people who loudly claim to care about the environment because they recycle their beer cans (and I love beer). Pardon me if I brag about that, but the facts are what they are.

What I don't want is to leave future generations in servitude to the likes of Al Gore and all the other phony elitists who justify their own excesses as "virtuous" because they are doing it for "us". They do it for themselves and, unfortunately, manage to deceive a lot of people in the process. Al Gore has done more to pollute the air, water and land than I could do in a lifetime, and only because he has fanatics like nix cheering him on.

Yes Mr. nix, I am "anti-enviromentalist" if you mean those people posessed of irrational beliefs and mesmerized by politican-priests to the point they believe dissent must be eliminated by any means. I came here to play a game, not put up with the BS of people who would turn a game into a political statement. If you truly want a debate, produce evidence that can be seen, a credible theory that can be tested and the logical basis for that theory. Until you can do that, I will remain an "anti-environmentalist" and oppose every fear-monger that demands we accept their beliefs, or else.

If you want to settle your dispute like a man, I'll meet you on FB and fight it out there once I learn how the war engine works. If you insist on being a worm, you can attack me on LU as you have, knowing I am a n00b and have never fought a battle. But I will say this, a battle in SC is not a verdict and whether I win or lose, you will be just as wrong after as you were before.

Finally, I want to thank those people who have come forward and understand that a disagreement should be resolved with rational proof, not by who has the most resoruces in SC, and certainly not by bullying n00bs just because you can. Thank you one and all, especially BC, CC and DK. If I missed your name, my apologies, but my sincere thanks as well.

Trahx. Firstly I have not attacked you once. I declared with the hope that you would reconsider using insults. I told you at the beginning that calling those who understand that if humans continue to chop down mature forest's and rainforest's and continue to pollute the seas, water tables, soil and air that we are risking the collapse of the Earths Eco-systems 'nutjobs' is something that I consider to be an insult and that if you were to continue with the debate and continue using that kind of language, it would provoke a response from me. And what did you do? use the same language again in your next post. So why cry about it when I did respond?

If you had read through the environmental threads as I asked you to, you would have seen 100's of my posts showing my evidence and the reasons why I feel we all need to do something about our actions now and that waiting for firm evidence that we have damaged the Eco-system beyond repair is irrational, selfish and just plain stupid.

And then you had to call me 'a sniveling, insignifcant worm'. What did you expect?

I'm curious to know why you couldn't debate this issue without insults? I'm also curious to know why, if you just wanted to play the game, did you involve yourself in the discussion and then knowingly provoke me into action?

You said 'an unproven and falsified theory' What the hell do you want? To wake up in the morning and the news station to tell you that is its now a proven fact that human activity has officially destroyed the planets Eco-system? Whats with this falsified theory? You have not shown anything of what you ask of me. No facts, no proof, no nothing. All you have done is talk about your disenchantment with those who are saying that if we leave it to late before we act we might end up destroying Mother Nature for good.

Ask anyone. I have spend hours/days/months debating this issue with many people. You are only the second person I have declared on (CC was the first). What does that say to you?

To me your problem seems to be with Al Gore and others like him who say one thing and then do another. Not those who only buy what they need and not what they want, use public transport instead of a V8, recycle what they can, switch off things they are not using and try and show others that we are all guardians of our children's world, therefore we are all responsible for its well being.

Or maybe you just don't like being told what to do. A bit childish if you ask me.

As I've said many times before. If we wait for the proof it will then be to late. It's not as if we can move to another planet if it turns out we have F#@%ed this one up, can we?

I hav'nt even started yet. As I said, it's just a shame you couldn't have a debate without the insults. The first post fair enough, thats why I warned you, but to carry on, to me, means you wanted this confrontation. And now you have it you cry bully.

LU is one of my Econ worlds. My Army is on FB. If you had posted that last post without the name calling I would have only be too pleased to wait for you on FB as it makes no sense for me to put my empire on LU into debt.
But as you still insist on calling me names I will continue with my mission on LU.

I guess some people just cant help themselves.

Ok........If you were to take the name calling and insults back I might reconsider. You have 36 hrs to respond.

Whats up nix, point em out. I've heard enough. I think if Trahx is willing to take it to FB and stay out of whatever else may happen on LU. I'd be willing to give him a pass for now.

Hi Wendy. You might not have read the last bit of my post before you posted. I was editing it as I went along. Trahx wants this fight. I've given him a way out many times but he still insists on giving it all that. And now I have given him another way out. I cant be fairer than that now surely?

nix, I'm always here, just point 'em out.

"nix. Your naivete is truly amazing. On every issue that crosses these forums, you express the Leftist party line to the letter.

Had you been born in 1920's Germany, you undoubtedly would have become a die hard NAZI under ReichsErzeihung. In Soviet Russia, a believing Leninist under Party doctrine.

The Great Lies of history have always required a populace too afraid or lazy to think for themselves. Now, another great lie is being perpetrated before your very eyes, the evidence is right before you, plain to see. Yet, you prove to be a shining example of how effective propaganda can be.

You prattle about common sense, use some." - Farmer Bob

Seems that someone already nailed nix in that environmental thread. Nix brings up one fact with no correlation or evidence of its significance, rambles on with alarmism claiming that anyone who does not agree with him is for the destruction of the planet, and he calls that a debate. The entire thread is laced with nix's alarmist comments that have assumed a catastrophe into fact without any evidence whatsoever.

"As I've said many times before. If we wait for the proof it will then be to late. It's not as if we can move to another planet if it turns out we have F#@%ed this one up, can we?" - nix001

Does that sound like reason or does it sound more like the screams of mindless panic? Is this type of rhetoric even debateable?

Interestingly enough, that post and the thread were from 2009, prior to the revelation that the climate gurus were cooking the numbers, the models and the process.

Thanks Farmer Bob. Nix indeed would have made a good little storm trooper and would have done whatever his masters told him to do.

Mmmmmk, Trahx now you do sound like an asshat. Leftist this, Nazi that.?!?

WTH, all because he cares about environment?

You bring up FarmerBob like that is a new name, kinda tells me you aren't so 'new' afterall. Add me to your enemies. I'll deal with you in true Nazi fashion.

Trahx, I think you're going overboard now. If you want to fight nix, then fight him. There's no reason to keep dragging this out.

Thanks Wendy. The last three days on SC I have felt quite alone. I am so grateful for your support, but.........over the past 16 years, from the streets of my city to the streets of The Old City of Jerusalem I have stood alone in my mission to bring the plight of Mother Nature to those who wish not to believe that their actions might be destroying Her. I was the kid in primary school who would jump into the middle of fight to try and stop it and end up with a punch in the face. I know I'm walking a fine line between the present and the future. And because its fine line I have to accept any concequences of my actions on my own. Maybe it's just a pride thing. But all the same, thanks again mate. You have given me a well needed lift to my spirit.


Trahx. FarmerBob is a conservationist (as we all should be). He understands the importance of leaving what is left to the future. I think we need to go one step further and try and replace/heal what we have taken/destroyed. I dont know but I think he would be disappointed with your lack of concern.

Ok. I'll shut the door to you having the opportunity to take back your insults in the interest of peace and respectful debate. Shame really. I would have liked to have seen your facts and reasons to why you disagree with me that mans activities of deforestation and pollution over the past 100 years is effecting our environment in a negative way.

I think that Trahx is one of many who until they see it they wont believe it. Fine when it comes to things like God and the lottery, but I don't consider it to be fine when it comes to my nieces and nephews future.

I for one am prepared to sacrifice my future and lifestyle (and life if need be) to ensure the future and lifestyles of our children.
If I'm wrong then only I have suffered. But if people like Trahx are wrong then it will be our future that will suffer.