I do not want to argue, I really do not, and I can not believe I have to go through this as the issues at hand are clear, however:
1. one single action every game month results in many actions for real day, week, month
2. if corporation or corporations have more than 45B in loans then one single action becomes several actions, paying of loans, then go to #1
3. except for doing single or several actions, and perhaps fees from taking and paying off loans, it is irrelevant to everyone, players and game owners, what the levels of cash in corporations are. if it's not irrelevant, if it has some far reaching or game breaking consequences, perhaps someone can enlighten me, because i cannot see them. i will listen.
4. as Upgrades for example were automated in past, so could be cash levels in corporations. see #1, #2, #3
5. if formula for Market Value is set up or balanced in certain way then corporation owners would make sure there are no excessively high levels of cash in their corporations simply because corporations with lots of cash, "fat" targets, would become attractive for (hostile) bidders, or because losing such corporation in a disaster for example would result in unnecessary loss of assets. this principle, evaluating risks and benefits, is not in conflict with anything "realistic", but rather the opposite.
6. as of now, if one fails to log in and execute "single action" for few days for example, one is at risk of losing corporation/s, especially if theres supply spike and low prices for product produced and high demand with high prices for products consumed. why should that be? what sense does it make for a corporation to close down if owner has so much cash that s/he being charged fees for having the cash?
i could probably go on but its too long already and i would only be reinforcing simple principle with other possible situations which are not beneficial to us, players, corporation owners.
still, if im wrong, which is possible, i would like to understand what is the problem, game mechanics wise, with either:
a) higher cash levels
b) auto-transfer "in" or auto-keeping of cash levels for corporations
c) lowering auto-transfers "out" from corporations
sure, if one is in army and an officer says "paint the grass green!", one will paint the grass green, however, i believe if one knows WHY one can accept the inevitable easier.
edit: while i was typing others have pointed out the .. obvious.