1.
Craigsw, I do not know what you are talking about, but maybe I was not coherent when I typed my last post. I was tired. To start: I have membership, and yes, free members are locked into best price mode, because the other trade strategies are premium only. My question was: Do state corporations have a default trading strategy that is set as a limitation on their growth? No.
2.
I just realized I did not get the default strategy trade settings right. The following is what the setting defaults to when I log-in during the succeeding game month/s after changing or turning off my trade strategies [in a preceding game month].
Selling: 110% -8%/month
Buying: 108% +8%/month
I am trying to be polite, but I do not see how that is optimized for growth in a corporation when:
A) There are extreme shortages in supplies and product, leading to a deficit in spending, which was happening to Yosha Anti Tank Missiles in the Democratic Union of Tara Una (Little Upsilon). [Now, the product is in surplus, but I am losing less?! But that is probably due to another variable I am not considering.]
Current Corp Deficit: ~-1.3B/Month. [Ouch!]
Previous Corp Deficit: ~-1.5B/Month.
The only way to correct this is lowering spending slightly and greatly increasing the sale price, assuming that the shortage will recur. I've already heavily invested in upgrades [for me it's extreme] and raised the target salary significantly. I will close the corps if I am unable set a sale strategy that is approximately 300% higher [bare minimum for sustainability] and sell a higher quality of the product successfully.
Lastly, that state corps was set up automatically, but since it's there, I've kept it due to the value of the product. This corp is 1 of 10 in the anti-tank missile industry on the world market (LU).
B) Most if not all the supplies are in shortages and the product is in extreme surplus. It would be poor business practice to create a corp in that market situation without good market contracts. For the sake of argument, I would have to lower the selling strategy significantly, raise salaries if it increases productivity, and heavily invest in quality upgrades to increase my selling price or to remain competitive at my current price. I could do all except change the trade strategy, which would have a profound impact on the sustainability of that corporation. For whatever reason, I can not even turn it off for more than a game month.
3. Most of my state corps in Tara Una are either barely making a profit or making a deficit hardly worth mentioning at the moment. I acknowledge that part of the game mechanics is to lose big on some corporations due to competition and poor business strategies. It's just the nature of the game! I have also lost two corporations in Sancti Romani Imperi (my leader country; yes, I am an early bird for the war game) due to my inability to effectively set trade strategies for the long-term.
[ASIDE] Since then, I have left the corporation building to CEOs because that is far better for country finances: +4.0B/Month w/out the beginner booster, consistently. That's in contrast to a minute +200.0M/month in the Democratic Union of Tara Una! It does rise to ~+3.0B, then drops again. These are instant ups and downs, alternating each month. I am keeping records of the finance page so I can pinpoint the cause.
4. Due to the fact that this reset of the trade strategy occurs for my state corporations [my enterprise is doing well and I can permanently set trade strategies for those corps], I will not be able to successfully reach a finance that will enable me to effectively defend Tara Una.
[ASIDE] I have spent 80B in ordering military units and fortifications, but for whatever reason, the units were never delivered and none of the unit orders are in pending deliveries. There are pending deliveries for the corresponding ammunition [these orders were automated], which is a sign that possibly means I have those units somewhere. All that I know is that I was planning to use those units for a small supply unit. I am guessing something had a better use for them. I am assuming that the military ordering thing has something to do with my lack of experience/understanding, and nothing to do with the game. I can see that my fortifications were delivered.
5. I really do not know why I cannot change or turn off my trade strategies. I do not know if it's a glitch or part of the beginners automation. If it is part of the beginners automation, then there are no settings available to me that would enable me to resolve the problem. Based on that judgement and the fact that this occurs during the game months that I am not logged in, it seems that something in the game month processing resets the trade strategies to the default [above] for state corporations of players with beginners automation. If so, then I should not be the only one with this specific problem. I have noticed, by looking at the state corporations of other player's countries, that some have trade strategies that happen to be what my state corporations reset to.
Four of Many Such Countries in LU Are:
i.The Independent State of Balikan
President: natilie.mguigan
ii.The Empire of Mindai
President: carinduff
iii.The Grand State of Bella marsalla
President:niallkennedy
iv.The Kingdom of Hella Anno
President:ackerman_2
These four countries happen to be ranked just above Sancti Romani Imperi and have state corporations with the same trade strategies. Some deviate slightly, which may be due to quality, etc.
Something I would like to point out is that none of these names, including mine, are aliases, they're personal names. When I registered, I intended for the my alias, as in the name that would show up as the President on the my country page, to be Sir Lazarus, with/without the space. My account name is Sir_Lazarus, not my alias. The two were switched. I assumed that I just incorrectly filled out the form, but these four people have real world names for their president too. This leads me to suggest that the registration forms are either incorrectly labelled for username and alias or that the forms are not well understood by the majority of new players who fill them out. I am just putting that out there for something to look into improving.
Lastly, I like the automation system. I want it to buy and sell the products for me, among other things. It works extremely well for my enterprise. It works for my state corps too, but my trade strategies keep defaulting, which is extremely problematic for some of my corporations. I have already gone as far as trying to turn off auto-selling/buying. It just reactivates on it's own.
I know that state corporations do not have a default trading strategy that is set as a limitation on their growth, because there are experienced players running state corporations with different trading strategies.
Possible Answers:
1. These default trading strategies are set for the state corps of beginners during game month processing, overwriting any trade strategies that were previously set.
2. There is some variable that affects members with beginning automatic support, causing the reset for state corporations.
3. A Mind-Boggling Answer.
[This problem may pertain only to premium members since free members only have one option: best price. Maybe I am wrong about that, but I did read that on the trade strategies page, so I assume this judgement is correct.]
I will assume the first answer. Do note that the reset selling strategy accounts for product quality, which is one good thing.
As I wrote this, Nov passed to Dec 8 and my state corps trade strategies were reset again, to the default. It does account for quality of the product to be sold. It also happened while I was logged in and during or near game-month processing.
World: Little Upsilon
Nation: The Democratic Union of Tara Una
President: jhgrant
The above is an eyeful and it's tempting to skim over, but I do appreciate that this entire post will be read, despite the fact that it's quite boring.
Three Things to Look Into:
1. the automatic system in regards to trade strategies for state corps
2. registering name/alias
3. military delivery [but that is more likely me]