It has recently come to my attention that you'd have to be the town fool to feel that we can trust Pres. John Galt not to promote the sort of behavior that would have made the folks in Sodom and Gomorrah blush. As is customary for a letter of this sort, I will now offer up paper and ink anent the phylogeny of his unpleasant publications in order to make the point that conspiracy theories are his bread and butter, and the wilder, the better. John's most outré claim is that if he kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick. This claim sets a new standard for xenophobic hypnopompic insights and shows how if John honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. While he is unquestionably entitled to ignore good advice from intelligent people, heated comparisons of him to Hitler do have a measure of validity. John isn't as deplorable and overbearing as der Führer, but if he manages to fill our children's minds with sniffish and debasing superstitions, our nation will not endure as a civilization, as a geopolitical entity, or even as a society. Rather, it will exist only as a prison, a prison in which unprofessional, snooty scapegraces attack my character.
John doesn't want to acknowledge that his false-flag operations serve no purpose other than to diminish our will to live. In fact, John would rather block all discussion on the subject. I suppose that's because anyone who is genuinely parviscient must also be genuinely self-absorbed. John is both. This tells us that the diplomatic and technical skills acquired through the creation of institutions and treaties geared towards shining a light on his efforts to discourage us from expressing ourselves in whatever way we damn well please can provide powerful models and experience for conveying the message that he has become a patsy to his own malevolence. You don't believe me? Well, consider that John's sidekicks have the gall to accuse me of imposing orthodoxy and suppressing dissent. Were these venom-spouting, unfriendly exponents of academicism born without a self-awareness gene? The answer has two parts to it. The first part regards the manner in which ignorance of the law does not excuse John from the consequences of violating it. The second part of the answer is focused on the way that reasonable expectation dictates that John would never biologically or psychologically engineer ludibrious misfits to make them even more polyloquent than they already are. Reasonable expectation, however, is regularly disappointed. In point of fact, as John matures emotionally he'll eventually grow out of his present way of thinking and come to realize that a frightening number of people accept his argument that we should all bear the brunt of his actions. In contrast, I prefer to follow, in Robert Frost's words, “the road not taken� and promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad. As Frost's poem concludes, “and that has made all the difference.� In fact, that “difference� is why I can stand before you and proclaim that John chooses to ignore the fact that the “in� thing this season for his lynch mob is taunting, deriding, and generally vilipending his revilers. No joke.
John skirts rules and regulations at every opportunity. If you doubt this, just ask around. I'm not in the habit of giving advice to his lazy sycophants. However, there's always a first time: You lazy sycophants should stop increasing alienation and delinquency among our young people. I admit I don't have much confidence that they'll follow that advice, but it's important to make it known that John likes to seem smarter than he really is. It therefore always amuses me whenever he cracks open a thesaurus, aims for intellectualism, misses, and lands squarely in a puddle of abysmal frippery.
Curiously, to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of the most gutless gauleiters you'll ever see it has to be repeated at least fifty times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following fifty times, but I've repeatedly pointed out to John that what he seems to be forgetting is that these types of irrational franions should be dealt with immediately. That apparently didn't register with him, though. Oh, well; I guess we have to set an example. If we do, others will follow, and soon everyone will be chastising him for not doing any research before spouting off. This is an encouraging prospect, especially given that John is the type of person who will trump up any lie for the occasion, and the more of a thumper it is, the better he likes it. No one has a higher opinion of John than I, and I think John is an obtrusive sophister.
John's expostulations promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for John's myrmidons because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to John. Forgive me, dear reader, but I must be so tactless as to remind you that “John� has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone abusing science by using it as a mechanism of ideology, I tell him or her to stop “John-ing�. I may be beating a dead horse here, but I do want to point out that he doesn't want me to hinder the power of uppish wastrels like him. Well, I've never been a very obedient dog so I intend not only to do exactly that but also to refute John's arguments line-by-line and claim-by-claim. One might argue that it would be better instead to reveal the truth about his claims, but bear in mind that we have much to fear from John. Personally, I'm afraid that in the near future, he'll impale us on a Morton's Fork: Either we let him manufacture and compile daunting lists of imaginary transgressions committed against him, or he'll obliterate our sense of identity. Regardless of which we choose, John sees other people as subhuman creatures unworthy of human sympathy. To pretend otherwise is nothing but hypocrisy and unwillingness to face the more unpleasant realities of life. I can see from the length of what I've written so far that I should save the rest of my comments about Pres. John Galt for a future letter. Let me close by stating simply that John wouldn't be able to rely on the psychological effects of terror to magnify the localized effects of his verbalisms so that, like a stone hurled into a pool of water, shock waves ripple from the epicenter of John's attacks to the furthest reaches of the Earth if he were working on a level playing field.
Robert E lee
LESS GOV LESS REGULATION
