A
AFChairman David Walker (Golden Rainbow)
22 Dec 2008 02:16
Link
In my situation, I had a shortfall of workers but I had large numbers in every category unemployed.
I see slight adjustments irregularly which are made to keep a positive number in each age group for the LLWs. I beleieve this was announced by W3 before.
I can only conclude that these adjustments take workers only from the employed people and not the available unemployed.
This then results in temporalily unnecessary unemployment. There have been no adjustments since. I guess the key is to keep the ages of LLWs managed as well as the employment level for all LLWs.
I see slight adjustments irregularly which are made to keep a positive number in each age group for the LLWs. I beleieve this was announced by W3 before.
I can only conclude that these adjustments take workers only from the employed people and not the available unemployed.
This then results in temporalily unnecessary unemployment. There have been no adjustments since. I guess the key is to keep the ages of LLWs managed as well as the employment level for all LLWs.