Suggestions: Merging Worlds & War Levels

I believe given the current population of the game, 5 worlds is too many. We were in the discord chat today talking about the state of the game, and it came up in the discussion that at one point in the game's history, it was possible to transfer an empire to Golden Rainbow when it was a premium only world. This means that there is a mechanism in place for players to move their empires and CEOs to another world.

I believe there should only be two worlds in this game. Fearless Blue and White Giant. White Giant being chosen for its large size, and Fearless Blue being chosen for its status as the war world. I think that war level restrictions should be completely removed on FB. War level there would be purely for achievement. Any player should be able to attack any player on that world regardless of war level. White Giant would retain the existing war level structure and restrictions.

I believe there are many benefits to this: First of all, it would consolidate the small player base into fewer worlds, making the worlds appear more active and lively. Secondly, it would be a perfect testing ground for what players prefer, war levels or no war levels. We would see it in the population levels of FB versus WG, which is preferred. Thirdly, it would decrease some of the load on your end for not having to run 5 simulations.

I think these changes would be positive changes. I would anticipate that FB would become more popular to WG, and as population increases, the worlds could be expanded again. Rather than create new worlds however, I think it would be better to add continents to the existing worlds to keep everyone in the same arenas.

Any thoughts? Additions?

I completely agree with this.

I agree as well you would have the best of both worlds and players would have a clear choice or can have the ability play both a peaceful and aggressive style at the same time.
Its also kind of depressing seeing all those empty countries. It might even bring back the Fed on Fed wars that were challenging and so much fun.

I completely agree. It would make the servers much faster to update.

I agree as well it would be the best of both worlds. It will give players a clear choice of either playing a peaceful or an aggressive game or both at the same time.
Its also depressing seeing all those empty countries. And it might even bring back those fed on fer wars that were so challenging and so much fun.

Sry for the repeat i must be forum challenged lol

This is a great suggestion.

+1

+1 +1+1+1 +1+1+1 +1+1

I was a bit short on time during my last post but I do want to ad something.
Personally I would lose out on a LOT of bennefits from having empires on 2 worlds. On average I earn anywhere between 1T en 25T per day by trading between those worlds. If the markets became combined I would lose all that cash. Despite that I really think that this would benefit the game.

Say what you want but there are not enough people for 5 worlds right now.

Agreed

Disagree. Leave things as they are. This has been suggested before and was put down. If more new players join there will not be enough countries for them. I also play on all 5 worlds (as do quite a few other players) so will I (and them) be fully compensated for the loss of my countries on the 3 other worlds?
I say leave well enough alone.

While it is an interesting idea... We won't be reducing the number of worlds or offering a way to move countries/empires/CEOs between worlds.

To bad... You can not blame us for trying ;)

Jonni something has to be done to get player numbers up. The game needs more interaction. I really think you guys need to reevaluate the damage that the war level system is doing to your wonderful game.

I think the change to Natural Resources will get players (hopefully) interacting.