LOL...
OK OK where to start. Ahh here we go; Quote: "I never said you haven't helped folks Ameche. In fact, during your stay I know you have helped countless people. Kudos for that. What I have said is you erased all that earned karma when your attitude took an about face. And I wasn't the first person you treated badly. If you remember correctly you were laying a heavy dose of Amecheism on some lad in chat and I came to his aid...thats were our rivalry spawned. You'll deny this tho because you prolly don't remember. I was a newb and irrelevent in your mind. Believe me tho, I remember. A guy just doesn't forget when a supposed respected vet unleashes a tirade on ya that would make a pirate blush. Great first impression!"
Yes I do remember that. Gee did you EVER stop to think that the person you speak of had already declared on me, and was about a game month from being taken out. Did you EVER stop to think that it was none of your business anyway, and you shouldn't have stuck you huge nose into it? Of course not, you see a big bad bully that screams for no reason. Pwned. Try again. I DO NOTHING without being provoked. Dirt, you're stupid.
"You really need to lay down some cold hard evidense on these lies you accuse me of. You won't because you can't. You still accuse me of sending you porn when a few months back when it first happened you were accusing Austia. You can't even get your facts straight let alone remember what I've said or done."
I sent the evidence to the GM. He did nothing about it because you assumed your position on your knees. I recently sent the evidence to the Dutch Trade Commission AND a friend in the FBI. Both have come back recently and said that you not only broke US law, but also International law.
So, as far as evidence goes, seems as though it's already been verified by people skilled in these positions. Do I need to verify anything, NO. The emails have already been verified as real, AND coming from one of those two accounts. As I said before, both of you use the same account, both of you are guilty. Period.
"Wendy is Wendy. No one controls her. I admit that some of her actions are shocking but you gotta respect her for the innovation. She has proven to all that she can whip butt with a limited amount, not to mention she has changed the rules on warfare completly. You say bah I know. I bet the British screamed bloody murder when the settlers changed the way they fought war too. Sorry the majority of SC keeps marching their soildiers into battle shoulder to shoulder, in lines, wearing bright red suits while Wendy is hiding behind trees shootin the holy hell outta ya. So similiar its eerie!"
No, it is not respectable to troll and cause conflict where there is none. No, it is not right to harass individuals endlessly to seek a means to an end. Your troll Wendy violated the terms of this game daily, the most brash of which is noted in the above post. She threatened and continues to threaten people because they laugh at jokes. Not acceptable behavior, even by her troll like standards. She revolutionized nothing. You think it is revolutionary to take shit c3's and destroy someone's hard work? You're just as bad as her. She is nothing on the war game, yes you inflate her already over-inflated ego by endorsing her behavior. You're a tool. She gets no respect from anyone because of the way she treats people. She does not deserve any respect, as she has done NOTHING to better this community. Period. You can respect her if you wish, your bad, not mine. I do not say "BAH". I say you are as delusional as I expected.
As far as Bayer goes, yes he told YOU he was inactive. LOL. I can tell you for a fact, he was active, and HE was the one kicking your asses. Just because you gave him a reason to be deceitful, no need to cry bout it now. Secondly, Sam is not my concern. He sees you cheat, must be ok to do then, right? He is simply going by the example of "anything goes" set by the UC. I see no problem with it as long as you guys continue being dickheads. You lose, again.
3. You are prohibited from transmitting through the w3creative site and services any unlawful or harassing or abusive materials and you will refrain from distribution or use of any threatening, obscene or vulgar material of any kind
4. You are prohibited from transmitting through the w3creative site and services any hateful or racially or ethnically objectionable material. (applies to wendy)
8. You are prohibited from taking any action to disturb the use of the services by others, distribute material that contains viruses or any other harmful programs. This includes interfering with the working of the network, attempts to gain unauthorized access to a service or other computer systems that are part of the site or any other site, by use of the available services. (applies to all of you)
11. As a user you are responsible for your account, the password to your account and any activities conducted while logged into the account. You are responsible for the confidentiality of the password and the account. You will notify w3creative.com of any unauthorized use of your account or any breach of security. You will make sure that the account is protected by a non trivial password and that also the so called secret question and answer that are intended for a safe recovery of the password in case it is lost, are all set up in an orderly and safe way. (I believe the exchanging of passwords and others entering your account falls under multi use, which is bannable.)
And as a result: Any deviation by a user from these rules of conduct will probably cause w3creative.com to immediately terminate the services to a user without any need for reason or cause and without any warning. W3creative.com will use its own discretion in deciding whether the user did or did not deviate from any of the conditions described above. Arguments about freedom of speech will not be discussed and do not apply on this site. All decisions concerning the continuation or termination of the services to any user, will be taken by W3creative.com.
So in other words, you did it, but either didn't get caught, or you do indeed have the gm's in your back pocket.
No, I am not. I did not kick my nuclear program into gear until I saw the UC for what they were, a threat. Can it Dirt, because you cannot even know how much I had or didn't have by looking at monetary value. Gee, you think that some of that 400T in assets included the 7 MILLION int and helo ammo I had, APIECE? Once again, fail. This is just another example of the UC being it's paranoid self, and also trying to justify a war that shouldn't have happened. Tired. You really are clueless. And it is a shame you think I am clueless also. Because you have no basis for your entire argument. Time to go back to mommy's basement (yeah we know you call it the dirtcave) fondle yourself and come up with new reasons to hate me. You'll find some legitimate reasons someday, I promise.