| ravenbourne (Golden Rainbow) | Thursday, May 29, 2008 - 03:44 pm 
How is it that an aggressive player who invades a neighbouring player country and has his own invaded after war is dec'd, but not started - has his WI reduced to 0.00 by territory loss - able to still retain that country and take another slave at the same time?
This smacks of unfairness.
The least should happen is that the country rebels and goes into no ownership - the best is that it goes to the player who reduced the WI |
| Danneh Turner (Fearless Blue) | Friday, May 30, 2008 - 10:18 am
Simply because the war hasn't started - the war index gets recalculated but you can't gain a country that isn't in active war. |
| ravenbourne (Golden Rainbow) | Friday, May 30, 2008 - 10:59 am
Thanks Danneh
I guessed this was so - but I call a land invasion before 'active' war, a sign that war has begun!
There should be a rule that says that if you declare and invade - and your WI then goes to 0.00 - you lose before it has begun |
| Zyna (Golden Rainbow) | Saturday, May 31, 2008 - 01:18 am
That doesn't make any sense. If anything, you shouldn't be able to reduce their WI before the war starts. There's a reason you get time to get back to your computer and see that there's a war going on |
| len Peat | Monday, April 14, 2014 - 09:11 pm
Are you playing your Game, too Strenuously?
have you heard of an English Company?
We are an English Company online. |
| Andy | Tuesday, April 15, 2014 - 10:13 am
You cannot move military units into a country if there is no war situation between the countries.
only if you are allies, in the same federation it would be possible.
It is also impossible to reduce the war index of a country by an invasion only.
assets must be destroyed, most of the army etc.
lack of fortifications will reeuce the war index a lot. |
| Nicolas Fernandez Ponce | Saturday, April 19, 2014 - 05:12 am
Andy. Answer to my thread and fix that absurd bug. |
