| SuperSoldierRCP | Wednesday, November 27, 2013 - 08:24 pm 
Andy
I just tested a stealth unit.
450Q inters vs 342Q stealth unit and the unit lost 3 bombers. Meaning in matching Q a bomber wing would only lose 1-2 bombers.
Which is a big deal but as we know stealth can inflict alot of damage. When someone has dozens of wings they can inflict WAY to much damage, also anti air only has a 0.1% hit rate.
Meaning it takes HUNDERDS of anti air to take a few bombers.
A unit of 850 anti air will destroy 4-5bombers.
|
| Aries | Wednesday, November 27, 2013 - 09:55 pm
Stealth bombers are expensive and needed a boost. The re-balance for them was likely needed and should remain. I agree something should be done for high war levels though |
| Andy | Monday, December 2, 2013 - 07:32 pm
I remember some discussions here saying that they are too expensive for what they can do.
it seems that they make more sense now.
we have done our own testing and they were not effective enough. they were shot down far too quickly and it was corrected. |
| SuperSoldierRCP | Monday, December 2, 2013 - 07:49 pm
I Agree Andy
I fought for them to be stronger Vs inters
But it shouldn't take mult attacks of 850 Anti air to clear a wing. And when there's 30 of them in a C3 its VERY EXCESSIVE.
I beg you to re check them.
Vs interceptors they should be strong
But vs anti air or fighters they should be much weaker. |
| Andy | Tuesday, December 3, 2013 - 11:14 am
We will keep measuring.
we have reduced the numbers of stealth wings in C3 countries last week.
These bombers cost 10 x more than the fighters.
also the cost of a stealth wing compares to thousands of anti air missiles and
attacking is as we all know, always more expensive. |
