| JamesPhoniex (White Giant) | Tuesday, July 29, 2008 - 02:06 am 
Spending space should be increased in countries to the amount a country can make a month without a booster. A booster could then double it. Why in the world is a country that makes 1 trillion of income in a month only able to spend half of it. Who agrees with this? |
| Keith Allaire (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, July 29, 2008 - 04:46 am
Make sure the 500B stays as a floor, at least. Otherwise it'll take noobs forever to buy the schools and whatnot they will need to succeed in this game. 10B a month makes for slooooooooooow infrastructure improvements.
But yes if you make a trillion a month, you should be able to spend it... |
| Angus88 (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, July 29, 2008 - 08:52 am
To me the main argument W3C would put up to support spending space is to stop people deliberately crashing the world market.
But I don't agree with that, I think there should be an easy to find option that prevents inexperienced players from overspending, but other then that anything should go. Maybe some option that prevents players from selling over a margin of surplus to protect markets. |
| JamesPhoniex (White Giant) | Tuesday, July 29, 2008 - 02:47 pm
Lets not make an assumptions here about crashing markets. There are players that can already influence it. It makes sense for players to be able to spend what they make on income. This allows for more trading to happen on the world market and direct transactions. If you got trillions why cant u spend a trillion a month if you wanted to. The spending power of a country should better reflect its economy. A noob should not be able to spend a trillion dollars but a player who has been in the game for a while should be able to.l |
