| JWUrton | Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 04:18 am 
Hello All,
I see a lot of new improvements happening. I am one who comes and goes from the game over several years so please correct me if this has been brought up lately. With the conquering of new countries why can they not be treated as a new state for the conquering country? The territories can still be segregated on the regional map, wars could be fought for specific regions but all country management would fall under one country name. It would make life easier for the person running the country. There could still be all the issues such as rebellions or what not that come with running a large empire but they would just be considered states under the one country name. |
| Aries | Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 01:32 pm
There is some merit here. For the most part, players run one country just like they run another. Having to log into each country and set similar settings again and again is tedious. There should be ways to manage multiple countries at once. Things like the "settings" and "automation" links at the top of the country page, trade strategies, and perhaps the ability to reactive military and such and more would be good. On the other hand, the option to set things for each state/country on a separate basis should be retained, as there are times where a certain state needs a different role or special attention. |
| Khome | Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 06:47 pm
I responded to this in the general forum, basically I agree that I have always promoted a unified country for stated reasons for easier management. I pretty much gave up on that dream, but I am promoting at least an appearance of a unified empire on the map, just aesthetic purposes. The map is stale looking.. |
| JWUrton | Sunday, August 20, 2017 - 07:33 pm
Well if topics of game improvement or change are allowed to be up for a vote and are actually getting changed based on player opinions, especially the senior members not just someone like me, I think that something could be done with the topic. |
