| alocien | Thursday, March 5, 2015 - 08:54 pm 
Was just thinking, Wouldn't it be nice if a CM can set a trade embargo on either a empire / CEO or another CM?
This would give a CM more of a meaning in the game i feel.
maybe have it set as the leader of said CM can set the proposal for the embargo, and a 75% vote is needed in order to pass. The Empire/CEO/CM on the getting an embargo would get a message stating they have been embargoed, maybe with an option from the sending CM to write a small message explaining why n such?
Just a thought. |
| Tony w | Thursday, March 5, 2015 - 08:57 pm
I second this, it sounds like a great idea! Hec I support this, it will add a bit more drama to a game that could do with some more options :D |
| Brandon Fleetwood | Thursday, March 5, 2015 - 09:10 pm
not a bad idea ALOCIEN I SECOUND A-lo's IDEA
I ALSO WANT NUKE FALLOUT BACK
SO IT CAUSES CAYOUS AND WAR DECLARES |
| Aries | Friday, March 6, 2015 - 08:02 am
I think some thought should be put in before enterprises are involved in the politics of the Simworld in such a direct way. |
| Jonni | Friday, March 6, 2015 - 01:46 pm
In theory it is a nice idea.
As Aries says though. I'm afraid that giving CEO's too much direct influence over the economy of countries is dangerous.
Retaliation against CEO's is near impossible except if the player also has countries. CEO's also have the ability to produce a far greater share of the world-wide supply/demand per product than countries (and empires in most cases) do.
If implemented this might have to exclude CEO's completely but that would make it a pretty ineffective tool. |
| Richard II | Friday, March 6, 2015 - 08:36 pm
Then in answer to your own point GM, CEO's with countries could be included in such a scheme, whilst non country owning CEO's could be excluded. This ensures the ability to counter attack the CEO's countries. |
| Casual Industries | Saturday, March 7, 2015 - 07:58 am
A CEO could get a small token country and not really be damaged though. |
