| Aries | Saturday, August 2, 2014 - 03:23 am 
This idea is simple and meant to add more politics and diplomacy to the game as well as give players a tool to deal with rogue states/players.
1. Allow the security council to vote to mandate the use of force on a player. That player must be at least war level 3.
Okay it sounds harsh but this is all it does if it passes.
2. The mandate removes war level protection for that player for the period of one month.
This means secured mode and temporary war protection options are still available. This only allows countries that wish to declare war on the player to ignore the 4 war level limit. |
| Jackseptic | Saturday, August 2, 2014 - 09:32 am
i really like this one aries. if it wasnt abused. |
| blah Blah | Sunday, August 3, 2014 - 07:01 pm
No offence but this sounds like a very very bad idea.
Most of the people who make it on the council are the really active/good players. This wil give them a change to farm the lesser actives. Even if it's not abused the fact that it becomes possible should be enough to not implement it. |
| Aries | Sunday, August 3, 2014 - 08:21 pm
I think the game has swung too much to relying on the game to protect them. In my experience, all these active/good players are not so bad. Try some diplomacy and make some friends and allies. This is what the game needs more of.
If you want to be a solitary hermit, secured mode and temporary war protection would still be available, even if you did lose a vote, or you could actually defend yourself. |
