| James the Fair | Thursday, October 10, 2013 - 03:02 pm 
I would like to propose a feature for nobody to ever lose their last country through war on any given world. The war should just end, not completely taken over by another player, as this is the reason why many of us have them in secured mode and cannot be attacked as we all know we would lose control of that country. It could also be possible to drop the war levels if this was implemented as everyone would be guaranteened to keep control of their last country. It could be just like the good old days again when there was a lot more players here on this game and where lots of warring and interaction took place.
.................................................. |
| James the Fair | Thursday, October 10, 2013 - 03:10 pm
I remember putting this on the public voting a few real months back, so i'm just wondering if the GMs ever discussed this with the players on this game like they said they would as i've only just returned to this game recently and hav'nt been active since I put that up for voting.
I still think to never "lose your last country" part of the idea would work, especially on Fearless blue since it is a war world and the chances of being attacked there is high. It's not like i'll be that bothered of having my country bombed to bits, because rebuilding your country up after a war, whether it's win or lose, would be the fun part for me. |
| XON Xyooj | Friday, October 11, 2013 - 12:29 pm
make everything at risk, that way aggressor has no where to hide.
though you can still keep your account, even if you loss all your countries.
no c3 country should be given free, when you buy a country at the price of 300GC from GM, all these GC must be converted to SC $ as your owner's equity for your country. |
| James the Fair | Friday, October 11, 2013 - 04:35 pm
Definitely make everything a risk on Fb where even those at war levels 0-2 should be put at risk, particularly if they're mouthing off to others there.
However I still think you should keep your last country no matter what, especially if you've got a large population of 60M for example as it takes so long to build up to that many people. |
| XON Xyooj | Friday, October 11, 2013 - 09:52 pm
on every world, not just fb.
if war levels going to stay then let no under war level 3 player declare any pvp on any other player and that no other player can declare pvp war on any player under war level 3 (as existing).
why let cowards hide behind their main country of hundreds of million population, and only risk the newly acquired slaves. war should be players against players, not country against a country (read my automation suggestion on this?) |
| James the Fair | Sunday, October 13, 2013 - 02:10 pm
I agree with you and many of your suggestions on your page that wars should definitely be president vs president and not country vs country as I suggested this idea myself several real months ago and got heavily criticized for it. Please have a look at my "replace the 25 countries federation limit" I did several real months back on this suggestions page. |
| XON Xyooj | Monday, October 14, 2013 - 07:03 am
@james,
i hope that someday this game will be more challenging and more realistic to reflect those of us on earth playing this game  |
