| Vladimir Lenin (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, June 26, 2011 - 07:23 pm 
I was just thinking. This game has all the strategic weapons...except for incendiary bombs, or "fire bombs". I think they should also add incendiary bombs to the strategic weapon group. I also think that, because there is no fallout resulting from a firebombing, that we should be allowed to use them on C3's. I think that 1 bomb should be enough to burn down an entire town, half of a city, or a quarter of a capital, and that the amount of damage it causes between casualties and physical, material damage should be about 50-50.
Anybody have any thoughts? |
| Emperor Andross I. (White Giant) | Sunday, June 26, 2011 - 07:57 pm
I think there are enough ways to destroy and kill in the game. Aren't there any peaceful suggestions to better humanity instead of thinking of new ways to hurt each other? |
| Vladimir Lenin (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, June 26, 2011 - 08:11 pm
I am just trying to add some fun to warfare. Besides, if this game is about realism, then incendiary bombs should be added because in real wars, incendiary devices are more commonly used than, for example, chemical weapons. This is why I bring it up. |
