| a9fc8yt3kd1 (Fearless Blue) | Friday, December 2, 2011 - 10:30 pm 
I have a question: I know that, as a president, there is a clear advantage to buying weapons and ammunition of a high quality. The advantage is that with higher-quality weapons and ammunition, you can develop a much stronger defense force without any significant increase in maintenance costs, but I am wondering, is it always advantageous to buy everything at a high quality? What about other products such as, say ... electric power? Does buying electrical power at a higher quality give you any benefits to offset the increased costs, or is it just a waste of money? What about all of the other non-military products? |
| CorporatePartner (Fearless Blue) | Saturday, December 3, 2011 - 06:48 am
Guns = 'good', Butter = 'bad' |
| WitchyPoo | Saturday, December 3, 2011 - 07:13 am
LOL CP |
| Crafty (Fearless Blue) | Saturday, December 3, 2011 - 08:10 pm
Higher Q country consumption is supposed to increase country welfare. How much and if its worth the extra expense is for you to experiment with. I have no idea and we are told its only a few points welfare gain, so maybe just a couple of products would be worth buying higher Q.
If you figure it out, let us know. |
