| Angell (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, June 16, 2009 - 11:11 am 
Ummm, what are the differences between these?
I've had a look around and cant find anything to help me. :/ |
| Kiteless (Kebir Blue) | Tuesday, June 16, 2009 - 11:51 am
Nationalised corps are protected from bids. This is the only difference. Anybody could theoretically bid on any state corps you have against your wishes, although this is unusual.
Nationalisation is useful for any corps you have that supply products your country needs. It is also used to protect strategic and plutonium/uranium/weapons grade uranium corps, plus other weapons and ammo corps. |
| Angell (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, June 16, 2009 - 12:23 pm
Wonderful, thanks for the help.. :D |
| Lord Tyrconnell (White Giant) | Wednesday, June 17, 2009 - 10:22 pm
So when one is new in the game it is good to have a mixture? What about the tax rate on national and state? Any difference? Or you choose? |
| Hiimad (Little Upsilon) | Thursday, June 18, 2009 - 12:20 am
0 for all state corps IMO. If someone invests in you're country,its good to have a tax of 0 so they will stay.
National corps,tax as high as you want.I think for Strategic corps,make sure to tax em very high so you recoup money on the things they build. |
