| Pathetic Sheep (White Giant) | Monday, September 8, 2008 - 08:28 am 
Does a 300Q air to air missile have the same chance to hit interceptors as a 100Q air 2 air missile?
Is a 300Q interceptor harder to hit?
Same question for all other weapons.
Also do higher paid soldiers and officers use the weapons more effectively? |
| Keith Allaire (Little Upsilon) | Monday, September 8, 2008 - 08:18 pm
There is no known benefit to purchasing high quality weapons over low quality.
I do not believe that higher paid soldiers are more effective in combat, HOWEVER low salaries may lead to soldiers leaving their jobs in favor of higher-paying (if applicable) corporate jobs instead. Government salaries should generally be comparable to or maybe slightly higher than average corporate salaries to retain government workers. While deactivated weapons aren't a big deal, closed hospitals and schools are lost forever and you must order new ones to replace them. |
| r| Himler (Kebir Blue) | Saturday, September 13, 2008 - 08:17 pm
I think the quality is just for the corporations to sell at a higher price and for money purposes |
| Angus88 (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, September 16, 2008 - 09:10 am
There is no difference... only price. |
