alocien | Saturday, July 11, 2015 - 06:43 pm I have had enough of Aries Holdings! It isn't important whether you agree with every detail that I intend to present. What matters is that you begin to realize that we have to set an example. If we do, others will follow, and soon everyone will be offering a framework for discussion so that we can more quickly reach a consensus. This is an encouraging prospect, especially given that Aries Holdings wants nothing less than to rip apart causes that others feel strongly about. Its co-conspirators then wonder, “ What's wrong with that? ” Well, there's not much to be done with biased race-baiters who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that Aries Holdings is an interesting organization. On the one hand, it likes to extinguish the voices of opposition. But on the other hand, I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival. Wherever callow boors are seen displacing meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion, Aries Holdings is there. Wherever self-aggrandizing ruffians are found condemning innocent people to death, Aries Holdings is lurking nearby. Wherever irritable cretins are observed identifying political and religious groups that are Aries Holdings's political enemies and re-labeling them as “ brash riffraff ” in order to justify operations against them, Aries Holdings will no doubt be in the vicinity. I defy any coincidence theorist to try to explain away those observations. Clearly, if you've read this far then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. To wrap up, I'll just hit the key elements of this letter one last time. First, a “ respected ” member of Aries Holdings's club recently said (to closely paraphrase), “ Aries Holdings never engages in lewd, muzzy-headed, or brain-damaged politics ”. Second, Aries Holdings is well aware that it can't throw away its integrity and expect the world to respect it for it. And finally, it and Machiavellianism are like white on rice. |
alocien | Saturday, July 11, 2015 - 06:45 pm “ = quotation marks. For some reason, the forums don't like them it seems. :-/ |
Aries | Saturday, July 11, 2015 - 09:22 pm To respond to all of Alocien's undertakings would take up too much room and time. I would like to address the most myopic ones, though. Before examining the present situation, however, it is important that I examine the social and cultural conditions that lead Alocien to teach the next generation how to hate and whom to hate. He thinks that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Even leaving aside the thorny matter of divining the varying proportion of his connivance, acquiescence, foreknowledge, exploitation, and incompetence in making people weak and dependent, we can state the following as an established fact: Alocien's jokes are indeed sordid. However, for many theorists in the humanities today, the key issue with his jokes boils down to one question: Isn't Alocien the socially inept fast-buck artist who recently wanted to mulct us out of our lives' savings? Well, I asked the question so I should answer it. Let me start by saying that if a cogent, logical argument entered his brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Thanks to Alocien's hypersensitive, saturnine surmises, only sophomoric bigamists now get to drive the bus, and they're driving it right off the cliff. Before we hit bottom, we should ponder how Alocien's dream is to assume total control over society's means of production. Those with membership cards in his faction will be given whatever they want while the rest of us will be sent away empty-handed. In addition to being utterly unfair, such policies promote harvesting what others have sown. Furthermore, I know some raffish, impetuous headcases who actually believe that his cajoleries are all sweetness and light. Incredible? Those same people have told me that the peak of fashion is to transform intellectual dialogue into ideological indoctrination. With such people roaming about, it should come as no surprise to you that I have a plan to find the inner strength to help you reflect and reexamine your views on him. I call this plan "Operation test the assumptions that underlie Alocien's tracts". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that Alocien claims that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters. I warrant that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that Alocien's unpatriotic execrations leave the current power structure untouched while simultaneously killing countless children through starvation and disease. Are these children his enemies? My answer to this question is provisional; I'm still trying to work it out. Even so, I can sincerely say one thing: Alocien's crime syndicate is a profligate institution if there ever was one. As you know, its agenda has been clear since its creation: infiltration, subversion, and global terror with world conquest as its goal. Stopping it mandates that we always keep one thing in mind, that I can say with absolute certitude that Alocien and several groups of jaded grizzlers are in cahoots to make my blood curdle. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: Alocien's effrontive sophistries. The key point here is that if we briefly prescind from the main point of this letter we can focus on how although I disapprove of what Alocien says, I will defend to the death his right to say it. Or, at a minimum, I'll remind Alocien about the concept of truth in advertising. Okay, that's not quite the same as "defending to the death," but at least it demonstrates that if this letter did nothing else but serve as a beacon of truth, it would be worthy of reading by all right-thinking people. However, this letter's role is much greater than just to expose false prophets who preach that Alocien can override nature. What shall we do? We have several options. We might rebuild our communities. We might encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. Or, we might put an end to louche credentialism. Any of these options, I proclaim, are acceptable. Still, we must choose one of them or else Alocien will marginalize me based on my gender, race, or religion sooner or later. Although I've spent most of this letter criticizing Alocien, let me end by stating simply that his schemes are colored by a sycophantic adoration of fogyism. |
ryanduffy1990917 | Saturday, July 11, 2015 - 11:12 pm You must be wondering, esteemed members of Little Upsilon, why it is that, when there are so many leading orators of the highest calibre present, I of all people should have stood up to speak: For neither in experience, nor in authority, nor in over-abundance of free-time and gaseos oration do i bear comparison with those above, and those of you who have thus remained silent. What great crime is it then, that has driven me more than anyone else to undertake action in this debate? I shall elaborate, if you so graciously please. I charge that these young men before you have unlawfully seized the property of another man, nay, of all men! For the gift of language, by the gods bestowed upon us universally - and yet evidently accepted by some ungraciously, and certainly by those above far less than fullsomely - is of a worth so great as to be beyond the expression of my pale and my puerile words. But in their pompous, indeed recklessly indulgent, verbosity, both Aries and Alocien have commited a crime so heinous as to be nigh on paradoxical: Not content with devaluing that which is beyond value, they have murdered that which never lived! And, ladies and gentlemen of Little Upsilon, unsated with this heinous crime, their greedy, wicked and criminal usage of language has become so rife that its murder occurs not only in secret, but even here in our most sacred and venerable forum! By the immortal gods, what punishment can fit this crime? What action can you venerable players, who have been raised from newcomer anonymity to veteran judiciary because of your noble qualities, and have been endowed with the power to sanction judgement on account of your high character (and having found the forum link), take to remedy these actions which have demeaned us all? As brevity is a great charm of eloquence - a maxim which surely should be carved upon the two defendant's computer screens and whispered in their ears at night - I shall here conclude my oration, but with a passing comment: Men who are wise, and endowed with the authority and power which you possess, have a particular duty to cure those ill from which our world is suffering. I implore you to take swift and authoritative action, and apply the full severity of the law in punishment. |
Brandon Fleetwood | Sunday, July 12, 2015 - 02:25 am In this letter I intend to express my views about Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN with gentleness and respect. Let me skip right to the punchline: Thanks to Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN's renitent snow jobs, only revolting, predaceous mattoids now get to drive the bus, and they're driving it right off the cliff. Before we hit bottom, we should ponder how I appreciate feedback and other people's views on subjects. I don't, however, appreciate feedback when it's given in an unprofessional manner. I have a problem with his use of the phrase, “We all know that…”. With this phrase, Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN doesn't need to prove his claim that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else; he merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, he is trying to brainwash us. He wants us to believe that it's predatory to summon up the courage to renew those institutions of civil society—like families, schools, churches, and civic groups—that attack his malice and hypocrisy; that's boring; that's not cool. You know what I think of that, don't you? I think that some of you are probably wondering, “What is it about our society that makes callow loafers like Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN desire to lead an active disinformation campaign?” This is not a question that we should run away from. Rather, it is something that needs to be addressed quickly and directly because one of the things I find quite interesting is listening to other people's takes on things. For instance, I recently overheard some folks remark that if anyone should propose a practical scheme for speaking out against behavior and speech that is intended to snooker people of every stripe into believing that he is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes, I should be quite disposed to incur almost any degree of expense to accomplish that object. In the meantime, let me point out that Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN has blood on his hands. Naturally, he pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN really had our best interests at heart, he wouldn't exploit other cultures for self-entertainment. My purpose is to raise several issues about Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN's splenetic histrionics that are frequently missing from the drivel that masquerades for discourse on this topic. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, I undeniably feel that Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN has insulted everyone with even the slightest moral commitment. He obviously has none or he wouldn't impact public policy for years to come. Should we blindly trust such smarmy know-it-alls? If you've ever read a Web site's terms of use then many characteristics of Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN's epithets will sound like the “what you're not allowed to post” section. They're unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, and otherwise objectionable. Or, to restate that concept without all the legal jargon, Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, he conveniently forgets his religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgiveness—or, at best, misremembers them as an edict to provide material support for terrorism. Unless Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN can achieve his goals by friendly and moral conduct, it is simply wrong to conclude that people prefer “cultural integrity” and “multicultural sensitivity” to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. He has long been introducing a zeitgeist of racism to our society. What worries me more than that, however, is that if Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN ever manages to substitute pap for art, that's when the defecation will really hit the air conditioning. He would have me serve as a human shield for his bombardments. For the benefit of any doubting Thomases I will prove that point via an explanation of how Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as “cantankerous” or “lackluster”. That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. The fact that my unsparing assessment of Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN's op-ed pieces is that they will substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence before long is particularly striking because the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, “Why doesn't Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN reveal the truth about himself?” A complete answer to that question would take more space than I can afford, so I'll have to give you a simplified answer. For starters, Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN wants me to stop trying to bring him down a peg. Instead, he'd rather I throw in with pesky race-baiters against the forces of good. Sorry, but I don't accept defeat that easily. Now that this letter has come to an end, I doubtlessly hope you walk away from it realizing that Pres. ARIES AND ALOCIEN 's pathological allegations run counter to human nature and, as such, are doomed to failure. |
Johanas Bilderberg | Sunday, July 12, 2015 - 06:35 am Are you two coming on to each other? |
Johanas Bilderberg | Sunday, July 12, 2015 - 06:35 am Are you two coming on to each other? |
Johanas Bilderberg | Sunday, July 12, 2015 - 06:35 am Are you two coming on to each other? |
Letsie | Monday, July 13, 2015 - 12:21 am This must be some sort of weird mating dance... |
ToeCutter | Monday, July 13, 2015 - 08:13 pm Show them some proper Texan smack talk Sam ;p |
Aries | Monday, July 13, 2015 - 09:28 pm For the confused, Alocien thought he was clever by posting the contents of a complaint generator. To show him that he was not so clever, I took a few minutes to locate the one he used, or similar, and posted my reply. |
Casual Industries | Monday, July 20, 2015 - 08:10 am *rouses from sleep momentarily* |
Lola | Monday, July 20, 2015 - 04:17 pm 'Yawn' |
EMPEROR VESPASIAN | Wednesday, July 22, 2015 - 05:36 am zzzzzzz |
Rymndsmsn1990 | Saturday, August 15, 2015 - 01:45 pm What the hell was that all about ?? |
Aaron Doolavay | Sunday, August 23, 2015 - 03:35 am just seeing long-winded ramblings spewed out on here makes me want to declare war on someone. |
Aaron Doolavay | Sunday, August 23, 2015 - 03:35 am edit |
Shu Pei | Sunday, August 23, 2015 - 05:47 pm Aaron Essay what you mean, the stellarium candidacy is up on forstate Plant Chargiums Wee Cannae ford this Gnoff tract. |
Aaron Doolavay | Monday, August 24, 2015 - 04:38 am it's not likely you're mexican |
Aaron Doolavay | Monday, August 24, 2015 - 04:42 am edit again, comp. keeps double posting |