| pacific (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 12:55 am 
Recently a security council banned a country againts to use nukes by a vote of 1-0 to protect his own country from attack. whilre not allowing presidents to vote on the resolution.
Then three of his experienced friends attacked a newer player when he was not allowed to use the nukes, they insdist that was a unrelated coincidence.
The other players got outraged and insisted the security council impose a mandatory peace after the IDC members (3) had continued to nuke the newer players empire for 2 or 3 days relentlessly after he could no longer fight back , under the relentless player presure they allowed for a peace vote wich was aproximently below is the peoples vote totals to force peace.84 presidents voted for the resolution and 25 presidents voted against it.
Somee players were upset by this so they voted on a resolution to stop one of the IDC Federation member ountry of Melichor from launching more nukes from his main country (only 1 country of 9 owned by super the other 8 are unafected by this vote) by that player.the result of the peoples vote to do this was. 56 presidents voted for the resolution and 15 presidents voted against it.
now that another player is threatening to attack yet another IDC Federation country in return for their actions againts the newer player this resolution is curently in security council voting to prohibit another attack. The security council is completely biased and protecting their freinds and Federation mates below is the newest resolution to stop them from getting attacked after you read it ill show why its all lies and wonder why some people in a position of authority constantly lie and think they know better what we really wt regurdless of how we vote.notice the unbelievable bias and alterior motives of the council statement.
Resolution x083E030C40220p1157R: No nuclear weapons for Inannas Temple
No nuclear weapons for Inannas Temple.
If the resolution is accepted, the country will be under permanent investigation of the INC.
The Resolution was a proposal by President John Henry Eden with the following motivation:
He is found guilty of trying to causing trouble with super by limiting the amount of nukes he can deploy at a time. The statement that he mentioned is completely false about the issue with supersoldierrcp and his federation... As punishment, the same ban he is trying to pass against innocent super will be placed on his country. Now..its up to the Security council and the great players of this world to make an example of such trouble makers as this.....
The Security Council is currently voting about this proposal. The council will make a decision before 26 Dec 2840
2 council members voted for the proposal and 1 council member voted against it.
point 1. security council statement:He is found guilty of trying to causing trouble with super by limiting the amount of nukes he can deploy at a time.(not true you can deploy as many nukes as you want you just cant launch them from one of his 9 countries not the other 8,its a she not a he the resolution that was directed at.super was the one that was in the war in question if anyone started trouble for super it was super ( conclusion lie)
point 2.the security council states the member was found guilty, guilty of what and by whom ( conclusion lie)
point 3. security council statement;The statement that he mentioned is completely false about the issue with supersoldierrcp and his federation. ( no it was not a lie conclusion another lie by the security council)
point 4. security council statement: As punishment, ( the security council is not designed to punish and under no authority to punish players, especialy when by a combined two issue vote of 140 to 40 the players agreed with this playyers positions, (conclusion abuse of power and careless disreguard of players feelings and votes by security council)
point 5. security council statement:the same ban he is trying to pass against innocent super will be placed on his country. Now..its up to the Security council and the great players of this world to make an example of such trouble makers as this.....
( its not anywhere near the same ban us players banned 1 of supersoldiers 9 countries from using nukes, the player this resolution is trying to ban only has one country it would completey ban the use of nukes by this player when it didnt supersoldier ( conclusion lie every statement in this resolutions a lie its just another way to try and overturn the players wishes for a pompaus we know whats right for you better than the people do security council, the playwers just decided to put supersoldier in the same position he that the country him and his fed attacked was put in, whats good for the goose was certanly good for the gander. poor inocent super my ass he attacked a newer player that had a nuke ban on him at the time. they must really think the players are stupid this is a sham and players are way to smart to not know it. its a bias crooked idc controlled security council that uses its powers to weaken others before they attack them and to prevet others from attacking their members.
i been sitting here quietly watching all this for two weeks but its time for players to take a stand this is most corupt situation i have ever seen in my life. |
| ZentrinoRisen (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 03:20 am
This really has gone on quite long enough. The Security Council should not be involved in every war on the planet and we really should not have to determine the motives behind every resolution. I don't know what is behind this current vote and I don't care to try to figure it out.
This I do know:
From this point forward, the people of the Nevrondona Empire will vote against all resolutions banning nukes or war, as far as they relate to this matter. Please fight your own wars and stop having the world body police your opponents.
Zen. |
| FattyMcButterPants (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 03:25 am
Thank you for bringing this to the attention of the LU community.
As a Security Council member I have voted against this proposal, and i expect other members to do so as well. As it stands...
The Resolution was a proposal by President John Henry Eden with the following motivation:
He is found guilty of trying to causing trouble with super by limiting the amount of nukes he can deploy at a time. The statement that he mentioned is completely false about the issue with supersoldierrcp and his federation... As punishment, the same ban he is trying to pass against innocent super will be placed on his country. Now..its up to the Security council and the great players of this world to make an example of such trouble makers as this.....
The Security Council is currently voting about this proposal. The council will make a decision before 26 Dec 2840
2 council members voted for the proposal and 2 council members voted against it.
You are a member of the Security Council and voted against the proposal. |
| Accordion_This (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 07:46 am
This is such a farce. Let's make something clear here: the IDC does not "control" the security council, nor are our "cronies" out to get anyone. This resolution was proposed by PJHE because Wendy has made threats against SSRCP and Eden wishes to prevent a nuclear war. This is no IDC scheme, it is just an attempt to prevent a nuclear war.
Let me say that again: as Chairman of the IDC, I declare publicly that this resolution is not supported by the IDC as it is not the business of the IDC to support or reject the Security Council's decisions. This resolution was proposed by Mr. Eden, NOT by the IDC. Of course, that doesn't mean that members of the IDC won't be voting for the resolution - it just means that this is not an official action of the IDC sanctioned by its Chairman (i.e. me).
It's time for the LU community to see the real situation here. It's time for everyone to see past the propaganda of Wendy and others and realise the truth of the situation here:
SSRCP and two members of the IDC fought AK 47 because he acted like an asshat, and because he was a veteran (crackcocaine) with 13 rich countries out of War Protection. That is, members of the IDC raided AK_47 because he deserved it, in the same way that members of this game have, for time immemorial, raided the resource-laden countries of asshats. This raid was NOT an IDC scheme or plan - it was a raid conducted by three players who are friends and members of the same federation. This raid was NOT unjust - it may not have been nice, but it was justified. And this resolution is a reaction by the Security Council against the THREATS of Wendy against the IDC. What better to do against a player notorious for using nuclear weapons than ban her from acquiring nukes? |
| FattyMcButterPants | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 12:03 pm
As a well known asshat, I will ask presidents who own CEOs and corporations housed in IDC countries to remove them in advance. There is no rush, I will not be able to declare for a few days yet.
Again, just a heads up, Nuclear Arms destroy private corps, please take the necessary precautions to protect your investments. |
| FattyMcButterPants (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 12:20 pm
And for the record, a raid against a player facing multiple opponents because he(AK47) had "resource-laden countries" is despicable.
There are tons of asshats in, on, or around the game, we do not hear of IDC raiding any of them. Just this newbie who had a few assets too many. Greed being the motive for this, case closed. |
| Accordion_This (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 12:28 pm
This player was not a noob. Crackcocaine AKA AK47 claimed to be a veteran and behaved like a complete asshat on the forums.
However, this was not the reason for the raid, nor were his resource-laden countries the reason for the raid. The reason for the raid was a combination of three factors: his threats towards veterans (especially threats of nuclear warfare), his asshattery, and, yes, the fact that he had 13 powerful countries outside of war protection whilst being a complete asshat. The reason the IDC used three members for this war was that AK_47 was perceived to be too strong an opponent for only 1 player. I maintain that the raid was not nice, but, like the classic raids of Simcountry, it was justified in teaching an asshat not to threaten and bully other players, especially vets. |
| FattyMcButterPants (Golden Rainbow) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 12:42 pm
How would you know? You already said that you were unaware that the raid even occurred. Now you suddenly seem to know AK47 was a vet? On the forums? lmao funny the 'asshattery' came after he was attacked by 3 members of your federation, not before. Go and get your facts straight before you spam the boards with you asshattery.
Accordion = Asshat.
IDC = Collection of Asshats
Conclusion = Psycho_Honey is "justified in teaching an asshat not to threaten and bully other players, especially vets." |
| Accordion_This (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 12:52 pm
I remember very distinctly the emergence of crackcocaine on the forums, and I remember very distinctly the asshattery which AK_47 perpetrated both in chat and on the forums before and after this war.
Come on, Wendy, it's time to grow up. The time for chucking impotent nukes around your nursery is over. |
| Accordion_This (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 01:00 pm
How about this, Wendy - you take your Secured Main out of WP to put something into your empty threats, we take it, and then you agree to keep your grubby paws off the good people of Little Upsilon? Sounds fair, right? |
| FattyMcButterPants (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 01:24 pm
*Yaaaawns*
You are never in chat. Man please you stick your foot deeper and deeper down your own throat every time you open your mouth.
My threats are never empty. Who is Matt? Nobody... This forum is riddled with real actions and very real consequences for bigger mouths than yours who were far more capable, skilled, and definitely more entertaining than you'll ever be.
I'll save this post and quote it for everyone to see once the screaming starts... |
| Accordion_This (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 01:42 pm
Just because I'm not often in chat doesn't mean I haven't seen or heard about what has been said on chat. Jeez, Wendy. Maybe think before opening your mouth and sticking your heel into it?
Your threats are always, always empty. Remember all those times you threatened to destroy Scarlet? LOLOLOL. Look who's sitting in Secured Mode with 1 44M pop worthless country because she gave up fighting Scarlet.
I gave you an opportunity for peace, Wendy. I was civil, I was kind. I never broke my word. I stood by my fedmates like a real leader does. For the final time, I will not be bullied or threatened by you, so you'd better put up or shut up. |
| FattyMcButterPants (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 01:45 pm
booooooring....
You gave me an opportunity for peace?! WTFizzle!?!
No Matthew, you begged for peace. You're a joke, as was any peace agreement.
I don't want peace that is almost as boring as you are. |
| Accordion_This (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 02:02 pm
LOLOL
I "begged"? No, I used diplomatic skill. You tried to get me to change the federation name, just like you tried to get me to ditch 3 valuable allies, but I did neither, because I wanted fair, unconditional peace, not peace bought from you as if you are some kind of powerful warmonger. |
| FattyMcButterPants (Fearless Blue) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 02:17 pm
You think I asked you for something you wouldn't agree to because I wanted peace? Wake up!
Powerful: yes, warmonger: no. Effective: more than, wasteful: never. Threatening: no, promising: always.
Yeah we expected you'd take the hardline. Essentially your predictability , Scarlet is arrogant pomp in the face of impending calamity. Pride will be your downfall, your boasting will be your shame when I post the results after making all these foolish scenes on the same forum you will soon scream on.
Another prediction, IDC will employ many lame and useless boycotts.
booooring. |
| Accordion_This (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 02:29 pm
"We"? You mean "you". No one else is on your side, Wendy. And if what you're insinuating by that post is that *I* am Scarlet, you're sorely misled. |
| FattyMcButterPants (Fearless Blue) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 02:56 pm
No, I didn't imply that you are scarlet, but you sure do smell like him.
Full of CaCa |
| Green Paws (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 08:51 pm
Green Paws Empire would like to help prevent nuclear wars.
If nuclear weapons are used then countries that are to be attacked should be announced in advance with the regions stated, to give anyone potentially affected time to prepare.
All compensation requests and payments should be published in the forum.
I hope to gain a seat on the Security Council within days and I believe that people with reasonable concerns about nuclear war can lead to the SC voting to restrict nukes.
Even if nukes are used and compensation and announcements are given, I would still expect that empire to be restricted afterwards.
Sanctions can be applied if an empire constantly works to get around the restrictions placed.
Those who don't announce targets at the time of war has been declared, and doesn't offer compensation in public, then sanctions should be applied.
Nukes are part of the game but this way it allows for consequences of threatening with or the use of them. |
| FattyMcButterPants (Fearless Blue) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 09:19 pm
Was there an actual point here other than stating the obvious?
I have warned CEO's based in IDC countries to move out. If they are affected after 48 hours after decs go out, on top of this forum warning, it will be more than difficult to secure compensation.
Therefore for the 2nd time, please CEO's if you have your corps housed in IDC countries I will not be held responsible for damages due to fallout.
Thank You in Advance,
The Fattest Chick You Know,
Wendy! |
| Woad (Fearless Blue) | Wednesday, August 31, 2011 - 09:26 pm
Announcing targets is counter productive. My understanding on how it works is finding the weak spot. Announcing it gives the game away.
Please stop all these calls for banning nukes. Im paying good money to aquire nukes. If I feel the need to use them then I should without any fears of a ban.
A more positive action for the security council would be to start giving away some of that whopping 500T cash its currently sitting on. Not scaring presidents whith the threat of nuke bans. I will vote it down every time. |
| FattyMcButterPants (Little Upsilon) | Thursday, September 1, 2011 - 01:43 am
Woad, if you are against banning nukes, let your general vote reflect your sentiment. Until you have earned a spot on the security council your opinion is of little concern to the broader community.
It is a common courtesy for me to put my enemies on notice of an impending attack. CEOs will have time to react and act according to the possibility of damages due to fallout. This is responsible, and a step in the diplomatic process. A chance for vigilant tyrants to reconsider their actions and respond to such threats. You are in no position to direct presidents nor security council members as to proposals or warnings of nuclear actions. Please make a note of that.
Thanks in Advance,
The Fattest Chick You Know On The Security Council,
Wendy |
| Gringo | Thursday, September 1, 2011 - 02:33 am
I think the security council should be nuked! |
