| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 04:07 am 
The High Profitess has declared against several of my countries.
Everyone in the area of liberty and The High Profitess' countries better go into protection mode because there may be nuclear weapons used.
High Profitess declared war without warning. if anyone can talk some sense into his head great. If not I will defense myself with everything I have |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 04:18 am
Profitess (Little Upsilon)
Monday, July 6, 2009 - 04:14 am
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just a soft reminder . . . my nap is over
While I am quick to forgive . . . I NEVER 4get
I'll be accepting "on your knees brown nose" apologiez for the next 36 hours ONLY.
After that is up who knows LooL
--------------------------------
So mister Nolan . . . I have asked you several times to move. I know your purpose for being in my area.
I haven't smelled any roses or any "bended-knee" pms.
Therefore, you have mistated that I have not warned you, or decd for no reason. My reasons are just, my cause righteous. No more asshats on Lacerta. Certainly not Privatized economies waiting to be acquired by my enemies when you are finished with them. Move or fight.
You are way past due . . . |
| slocketer17 | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 04:21 am
uhmm, this is hypocritcal....
so where's the ban on this LG? |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 04:36 am
I will gladly sent more troops to fight. Or as A merchant I will sale for the right price.
But then again I like bargains sales, but
then maybe my forces can take cheaper. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 04:55 am
No its not. Slock, I'm actually on your side in principle about what happened. But I wasn't going to Let you gys in LDI gang bang LG in typical fashion . . . ? NO
Nolan has played longer than I have.
Nolan is very confident in his war skill . . .
With statements like this
"I'd much rather sell you some nukes then use them on your counties"
LMAO, I invite the challenge.
Nolan has privatized several economies in South Dade, that BC, Klarina, and other possible enemies have used to position around me to eventually fight with.
I warned him that I was aware what he was doing. And after I actually was decd on by c3s with ALL private corps formerly owned by Nolan, I had enuff.
Quit yer itchin! Do you see on the MAP where it says "RED = Large Empires who may NOT like New neighbors"??????
Last I checked, GUESS WHAT, my empire was red!!!
Furthermore, I have stated several times (though it goes without saying/typing) . . . "Lacerta is a war zone. If I find you are running operations posing a security threat to my empire, I will declare the partie(s) in question to be enemy combatants. Regardless of direct or indirect action against my once small red empire.
I have lived in peace with many presidents from Lacerta and elsewhere. I for sure am not the mighty LDI, I don't wipe out super empire's in a weekends time, OR terrorize people to leave the game, "Which seems to be the case being made against you/LDI."
My operations are based on homeland security.
Yours seem to be based on Schwag.
NOW, FINALLY . . . maybe you wish to join Nolan you are being cynical and retarded on top of trying to get me banned. I will take that as a "Self Admission" to being an enemy combatant.
I thought you left the game. Whhy are you still spamming the forum with this endless whining and nonsense? OOOOH you need a reason to stay? Get a country and maybe I'll find a good reason for you. I would surely hate to see you go.
AND BTW . . . How many nukes would you like up YOUR ARSE?!? |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 05:38 am
my empire also is red on the map.
I trade with your "empire" until you did not honor your end, so I take everything you say as hot wind |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 05:55 am
worker trades??? gimme a break
I accepted where I could accomodate the workers.
Again, move it or lose it. Lacerta has been a hotbed for hundreds of game years, I would assume you are stupid, but I'd rather believe you weren't that dumb to privatize all the corps in the region and were up to something.
NEXT |
| Laguna | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 08:59 am
I would open a dictionary and search the word hypocritical, Slocketer. Upon realizing failure, I would search for another term.
Expect for "shoving a nuke up your arse", it all seems rather accepted and friendly. Taking into account Wendy... it all seems pretty normal. |
| slocketer17 | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 06:55 pm
Once again LG, you assume that everyone around you is retarded. You are not as intelligent as you think.
I do realize what the word hypocritical means as I am not a five year old.
In fact, if anyone is retarded it is you. You killed the game for everyone. Congrats
Most of Wild's wars were friendly. In fact if you read most of the posts in the july thread you will see that. I haven't seen one post saying that Wild has been "abusive." Even Jojo who was defending you, gave in to this fact as well.
Wendy, it is hypocritical in that Wild was criticized for "noob" killing, when indeed she hadn't been killing noobs. Additionally, LDI was criticized for killing someone after they hostile bid (somewhere in the thread, it's too fucking long now to find it).
As for schwag vs. security. Schwag is what the game is all about. It makes the game enjoyable. However, we never fought simply based on schwag, we fought for specific reasons, the schwag that followed was simply a byproduct of our victory, as victory is by definition scwhag. |
| slocketer17 | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 07:04 pm
Just to clear this up...
I am not trying to get you banned Wendy, indeed this was not aimed as a shot at you. In fact, since I have returned I have come to respect you as has the rest of LDI. You are a player who holds an attitude very close to that of the members of LDI and for that I hold you in high esteem.
I was simply stating the hypocrisy of the GM and LG. |
| Laguna | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 08:56 pm
Hypocrisy is to say something and do the opposite. I say don't attack new players and I don't act new players. Hypocrisy level is 0.
The word you are looking for is around unfair. And that is only from your point of view. You dub one action as equal as the other, no matter the circumstances. I don't. If you had bothered to read Wendy's post, you'll see this is not only because of one bid.
Something that is similar to hypocrisy is a lie. For instance, to claim to deregister countries, but keeping them anyway. |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 09:40 pm
6 countries declared war against liberty.
limited air strikes launched against the capital of all 6 countries.
4 enemy capitals completely destroyed
1 capital 80 plus % damaged
1 capital under air attack as we speak.
I have repeated said I don't want to fight wars.
I am now proving I can and will if pushed. |
| slocketer17 (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 10:01 pm
Good to know, that you don't know the definition of hypocrisy...
you were quite close though...
That is an example of hypocrisy that you describe, but that is not the whole picture.
In fact, this is the definition of hypocrisy as provided by dictionary.com
"a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess; falseness"
In fact, what I described would indeed fit that definition. If you need me to explain that as well because your mind cannot grasp this, just ask i'll be glad to.
As for repeated bidding, yes that is how it usually happens for us as well...We have given warnings on many occasions.
If that last line was meant as a shot at me for not having deregged my stuff yet, it is because I am too lazy to. I enjoy yelling at you on the forum. I have not opened any of my countries yet, and in fact I have already deregged half of my stuff. 2 countries, 1 enterprise. |
| Laguna | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 10:06 pm
The definition of hypocrisy in thefreedictionary.com is:
"The practice of professing beliefs, feelings, or virtues that one does not hold or possess; falseness." Sounds a lot like what I wrote.
Even so, following your definition, I view one virtue as conducting in a appropriate manner with new players. Find another term.
Repeated bidding? No. Single. Not even bothering to send a message asking not to do that again and why, explaining it is common conduct. |
| slocketer17 (Fearless Blue) | Saturday, July 11, 2009 - 10:09 pm
Yes...thanks, but that would be the same as mine.
It does not say practicing beliefs, feelings, etc...
It says the practice of professing etc...
They are quite different.
And i just deregged the rest, guess its time to say goodbye. |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 12:49 am
sword of Damocies felled to liberty forces a few seconds ago |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 03:32 am
sukks I just logged in, but im here now
Im so terrible at this, /I need more practice |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 04:57 am
seven forces of serenity fell to liberty forces. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 05:06 am
your killin me nolan |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 12:40 pm
I understand your plan. you don't really want to win |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 04:17 pm
Oh but I will . . .
. . . I just never came prepared in force, only to fight. You will vacate or suffer more losses than I ever will. |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 05:57 pm
you have only one option now
be my slave or my customer
you have an option to be my customer by standing down and ask for peace.
you can see i have been push and will fight.
i am a merchant and will sale any copuntry for a price. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 06:47 pm
LMAO, me buy a country . . .
I too am a merchant Nolan
I would buy a country, but there would have to be some margin of profit for me.
Last I checked, your close slaves are barely above water. Now that I am nuking them they proly are tanking as we speak, not to mention your rebuilding costs.
You my kind friend, while I have been fighting you, and others, my empire debt has decreased by about 50%. And no, I din't buy any coins, or make coins cash. You helped out with that. And you will help oout more or pay heavy for your insubordinate posturing.
Propaganda, while useful, only makes you look slow. If being a "slave" is as helpful as you are being right now, I gladly accept.
From a bizznezz standpoint, you are losing lots of money and stand to lose alot more. This operation you are running is running in the red, what do your financiers think of that??
As we speak, the battle is about to affect your entire empire until you comply with my previous demands. Move or fight - your choice. |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 07:47 pm
Yes i have help cut your Empire debt because the combined debts less assets of countries I have taken is a negative 15T.
the countries you declared war on me were major jokes. your plan was simple start a nuke war to
rip countries of Unwanted CEO in the region.
I will take your assets where ever i find them |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 09:38 pm
ceo's I have no problem with,
you moving all private corp into countries pre war, is not acceptable. If you would have kept half the countries I saw you privatizing, there would be no red screens.
Common sense Nolan. I caught on to what you were doing the first time I saw an enemy in a country you had, then went to take out corps only to find there was not ONE single state corp. As is the case with several other slaves of known enemies.
You can take all the "Negative" assets you like, but wouldn't that really mean I am taking assets . . . from you?
I will destroy your assets that pose a threat to my empire until you move, therein. . . lies the victory. Have fun with that. Is it really worth the trouble? |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, July 12, 2009 - 09:57 pm
all my countries corps are purchased by my CEOs ASAP,
To build up a country fast country presidents build and then sold to CEO. (there is a limit to CEO builds) In turn I don't care if you bids on my corps as long as whatever rules that the you use to govern how you deal bids on your corps if the same rule.
basicly your anti-CEO |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Monday, July 13, 2009 - 05:00 am
"all my countries corps are purchased by >>my<< CEOs ASAP"
Take a look at how many corps are in liberty now hmm.
Maybe two.
Does this have to happen to the rest of your empire too. Wise up. Please.
I just dumped my own CEO. Why would I want to purchase ANY corps.
In fact Nolan, you could build some corps in my main if you want. After you remove your garbage from my borders. |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Monday, July 13, 2009 - 05:32 am
your destroyed other CEO's corps therefore
I have a feeling that I am not the only one after
you now |
| Nolan7 (Little Upsilon) | Monday, July 13, 2009 - 01:12 pm
Let me make sure what you want.
you don't want any CEO in the regional, all Corps should be state owned. |
| jeffyboy (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - 10:22 am
wendy you have lost so many countries its disgraceful, here's an idea for ya, quit, just quit, and you should start playing a game more your style, like solitaire, you cant bug other players, you cant lose, you can cheat to win, and and at the end of the day when you continue to lose at solitaire you can only blame yourself, not others |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - 04:49 pm
LMAO, 10 days after you quit.
I knew you weren't a quitter after all.
I have lost so many c3s I am so disgraced. You hit it right on the button jeffgurl. And I blame you. Get off my sack buddy. |
| SECDEF Revival (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - 05:40 pm
Jeffy, if your going to quit, quit.
There's no point for you to stay here and keep starting some more Emotional BS. |
| Emperor Norberto (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - 05:54 pm
Who's winning? |
