| Klarina Espinosa (Little Upsilon) | Thursday, May 21, 2009 - 04:41 pm 
Some of you have some very, very poorly defended slaves. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Thursday, May 21, 2009 - 05:48 pm
Tell me about it. LooooL. I'm not a Vet, but my Slave got caught with its pants down. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Thursday, May 21, 2009 - 06:49 pm
It also amazes me that mercian trivocantes?? has been able to use air wings to deswtroy targets out of range, yet my air wings which are the closest possible location in my country border, cannot touch anything in that country.
BBBBSSSSS wth?? |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Thursday, May 21, 2009 - 06:50 pm
Aqua if you are listening, Id like to take only one country, please done make me nuke them all. |
| Ares (Little Upsilon) | Thursday, May 21, 2009 - 07:58 pm
Shhh Klarina. I don't mind their poorly defended slaves  |
| L3athalSerph (Little Upsilon) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 05:36 am
now wat did i miss? |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 07:50 am
Hey L3 long time bug guy . . .
Nothin much BC got me, Im gettin Aqua blah blah
SC life |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 07:51 am
I guess its a "Pants Down" Party
DRINK UP!!! LooooL |
| Ravenous Cannibal (Little Upsilon) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 08:26 am
That would be a good name for a slave country. |
| Tattooed Priest (Little Upsilon) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 09:14 am
I have always believed that the reason some of the game vets choose to have some poorly defended slaves is because they feel comfortable enough with their social game status to not be attacked out of greed alone. Many of these vets would have half of LU supporting them if attacked for no good reason. |
| John Fire (Golden Rainbow) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 04:34 pm
Interesting... |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 05:13 pm
Well I did read somewhere that if your empire isn't defended at least half arse, that the person "deserved" to get it taken. However, I do agree with TP. Well Said. |
| jason (Kebir Blue) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 08:39 pm
no D and no wp = swag |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 09:38 pm
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
On the I WILL Hurt YOU side no weapon losses were reported. The weapons chosen by Mercian Trinovantes were not effective in this attack. I WILL Hurt YOU defense was assisted by the Utrakta unit.
From just moments ago. You see again I tried to honor the agreement to take one country only.
Now I will not stop until I nuke you to 5mil pop, or take them all. You make no sense aqua.
You lose. Which is why i was kewl enough to leave it at one. Did you think I ran out of ammo? LOOOOOL nah, I went to the store for an hour or two. Wal Mart to be specific. Still trying find that glitch with your air wings eh? Sad lil man. My weapons reach you. Fair and Square. You got off on that glitch yesterday. Stop the frivilous nuke attempts to. I will take only one more, now after that, can we agree to stop the violence?
You don't look too inactive to me. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Friday, May 22, 2009 - 10:12 pm
For those who think I am delusional, heres a script from gm news, Feb to March 2425 LU time
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
Chester is very severely damaged. Weapons based at Chester may have been destroyed. The unit Providence of Mercian Trinovantes lost 13 precision bombers. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Providence lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Mercian Trinovantes lost 46 soldiers and 119 were wounded.
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
On the side of I WILL Hurt YOU there were 312 casualties and 603 civilians were wounded. Seaside is severely damaged. On the I WILL Hurt YOU side no weapon losses were reported. The unit Romblon of Mercian Trinovantes lost 47 precision bombers. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Romblon lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Mercian Trinovantes lost 124 soldiers and 472 were wounded. I WILL Hurt YOU defense was assisted by the Vigar and Garrison TG547 unit
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
On the side of I WILL Hurt YOU there were 98 casualties and 197 civilians were wounded. Jati is very severely damaged. Weapons based at Jati may have been destroyed. The unit Romero of Mercian Trinovantes lost 58 precision bombers. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Romero lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Mercian Trinovantes lost 197 soldiers and 601 were wounded. I WILL Hurt YOU defense was assisted by the Vigar and Garrison TG538 unit.
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
On the side of I WILL Hurt YOU there were 354 casualties and 707 civilians were wounded. Jati is very severely damaged. On the I WILL Hurt YOU side no weapon losses were reported. The unit Mendiso of Mercian Trinovantes lost 65 precision bombers. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Mendiso lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Mercian Trinovantes lost 230 soldiers and 657 were wounded. I WILL Hurt YOU defense was assisted by the Vigar and Garrison TG538 unit.
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
On the side of I WILL Hurt YOU there were 354 casualties and 707 civilians were wounded. Jati is very severely damaged. On the I WILL Hurt YOU side no weapon losses were reported. The unit Mendiso of Mercian Trinovantes lost 65 precision bombers. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Mendiso lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Mercian Trinovantes lost 230 soldiers and 657 were wounded. I WILL Hurt YOU defense was assisted by the Vigar and Garrison TG538 unit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
On the side of I WILL Hurt YOU there were 2006 casualties and 3222 civilians were wounded. Jati is very severely damaged. On the I WILL Hurt YOU side no weapon losses were reported. The unit Mendiso of Mercian Trinovantes lost 71 precision bombers. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Mendiso lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Mercian Trinovantes lost 242 soldiers and 646 were wounded. I WILL Hurt YOU defense was assisted by the Maraton and Garrison TG538 unit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
On the side of I WILL Hurt YOU there were 2006 casualties and 3222 civilians were wounded. Jati is very severely damaged. On the I WILL Hurt YOU side no weapon losses were reported. The unit Mendiso of Mercian Trinovantes lost 71 precision bombers. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Mendiso lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Mercian Trinovantes lost 242 soldiers and 646 were wounded. I WILL Hurt YOU defense was assisted by the Maraton and Garrison TG538 unit.
Hostilities between Mercian Trinovantes and I WILL Hurt YOU
On the side of I WILL Hurt YOU there were 72 casualties and 150 civilians were wounded. Gronneka is very severely damaged. Weapons based at Gronneka may have been destroyed. The unit Monardo of Mercian Trinovantes lost 59 precision bombers. The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles. Monardo lost 1 or more trucks, gasoline and military supplies. Mercian Trinovantes lost 242 soldiers and 619 were wounded. I WILL Hurt YOU defense was assisted by the Maraton and Garrison TG530 unit.
Now im gonna quit there is too much to copy n paste, I just wanted to paste it here b4 they say I am lying and such. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, May 23, 2009 - 06:11 pm
ANother odd occurence in SC.
Now, maybe I read the game news wrong. But garrisons are supposed to auto fill without you manually while NOT in war, BUT I swore I read, that if you are declared on, and you have no garrisons, you have to fill them manually and INSTALL THEM WITH SUPPLY UNITS.
The reason I type this is because of the four countries belonging to aqua, you'd be hardpressed to find a supply unit alive to install a garrison, yet the garrisons are popping up in all countries. In multiple targets NOW HOW DOES THAT HAPPEN, during war with no supply units?
Did I read wrong, cause it isn't making much sense to me. |
| Barney Rubble (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, May 23, 2009 - 11:36 pm
The def respose can be quirky at time but he may have some "old def" in place. aqua has been on LU since the beginning of this world. the old style of def deployment allowed you to autodeply VERY large defenses long before the advent of the new engine and supply units. I still kick myself for undeploying all my D when the new engine began.
Ive encountered this many months back on bayars FB country.
If this is the case and def responds under the old guidelines, and he has larger then average placements, you may have some fun shooting 1000 wep offensive units at many thousands of defensive units. Could be like having to kill 100's of stocked defensive bases.
Not sure if you were around under the old system. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, May 24, 2009 - 12:15 am
yeah I was around just not fighting, this is gonna be fun, I am enjoying, thx Barney. |
| Ravenous Cannibal (Little Upsilon) | Monday, May 25, 2009 - 05:51 am
Someone messaged me recently pointing out the I had a poorly defended slave. I had to disagree. The country had around 6T in military assets, 5.9M population, and 2.5T total assets. The assets could be transfered in one sitting and the population is below worthless. 6T in defense is actually overkill.
After taking a closer look I recalled that I only bought ammunition plus a few interceptors for this slave and decided against buying forts. In order to strip out the population I jacked up government salaries. In the event of a war I could transfer in 2.4T in batteries and still immediate purchase enough forts.
I think there is a list of reasons for varying the military composition of each slave in your empire. In some cases an adequate offense should be an adequate deterrent. Rather than preventing the capture of a nearly worthless slave a you might prefer capturing the country making the attack.
Defense in the empire is far more relevant than defense in each individual slave. If you are looking for a war, leaving undefended slaves might be the only way to get one started. |
| The High Profitess (Little Upsilon) | Monday, May 25, 2009 - 05:47 pm
Sheep looking for war . . . NO WAY? |
