 |
|
|
|
Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 12:40 am  The vote so far is 67 to 10 on the question: --- ask for this vote as a Security Council vote to ask EC to remove War Protection from his countries and fight fair, or to stop fighting. A vote yes, is a vote to make a statement that hiding his empire in war protection while attacking is not appropriate. Please vote yes, and insist on a fair fight. --- EC has NOT removed war protection from all his countries yet. The last time a security resolution was defied, the security council approved a boycott and military action against the offending countries (https://www.simcountry.com/cgi-bin/discus/board-auth.cgi?file=/3712/13887.html&lm=1257042903). As the security council member proposing the resolution, I now ask that all countries please continue the tradition of supporting the security council and boycott the following countries: Albatross, Cherokee, Epic Chaos, Legion, Rapture, Raven, Reaper, The Independent State of Jakti, The Parted Waters, The Republic of Vibressa, x2, x4, x5. If the boycott does not force EC to follow the resolution, as in the past, I will request that the security council approve the use of force to ensure that EC complies with the Security Council. The community of WG has spoken and condemned EC launching attacks while keeping countries under war protection. He is now warned to either remove war protection on all countries, make peace, or face united action from the WG community. While a small number of players (10) are opposed the resolution, and I am sure are going to whine and complain and make threats; the vast majority (67) have spoken. I ask all players on WG to support our community by boycotting EC's countries until he complies. To do this go to the TRADE tab at the top of your screen. Then select BOYCOTTS and then NEW BOYCOTT REQUESTS and type in the following countries one at a time: Albatross, Cherokee, Epic Chaos, Legion, Rapture, Raven, Reaper, The Independent State of Jakti, The Parted Waters, The Republic of Vibressa, x2, x4, x5 Thanks, Chrysostom
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:08 am From: Agape Inc To: scary beyond all reason Real Date: 13-09-2010 14:43:47 World Date: June 13 2754 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: WAR ON WG Message: (part 2) Making Brutus and EC mad is part of my war plan. That will continue after I lost my 9 countries. I saved up hundred of trillions of dollars and thousands of gold coins as part of my plan B for a war. Should EC and Brutus actually win stage 1. They will then face stage 2. Stage 2 is a Wendy-like war that will last for about 6 months, if not longer. It will include several messages that appear like war is declared every day, and real war decs. It will include constant c3 wars to annoy him, etc. It will also include economic attacks. That will be fun. His stupid decision to attack me, has now given me license to annoy him every day. The insults and annoyance will continue and will get worse :-)...until I get board of it...which likely will take a long time. (cont)
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:14 am From: Agape Inc To: scary beyond all reason Real Date: 13-09-2010 14:51:43 World Date: June 14 2754 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: WAR ON WG Message: (part 3) I have also set-up all my countries with certain booby traps. If he takes them over, he will find they have a negative value that will accrue towards him (not me). Ever since I left WGC, I thought it would be WGC to step into the trap. Looks like it will be EC or Brutus. I'm not an expert at war, but am an expert at how to make countries extremely unprofitable. Each country is a trap once it is taken...and I've set up traps in several of his own countries, that I will launch at my pleasure. That is why I have transfered a large number of corps in his countries...each one is a time bomb :-) I'll be raising those salaries, and lowering effentcy to 100, causing a labor crisis soon ...at my pleasure:-)
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:17 am so as you can see, chryso has lead his fed into a disaster, and continues to instigate. He only wants EC econ countries unprotected, so that he can spend the next 6 months harassing him. this has been his intention, all along. not to mention, he's already began econ warfare with the countries he's complaining about... so he's already fighting these countries, with or w/o wp.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:38 am remind me who decced who? what do u expect the guy to do? You attack with c3's, to prove a point to the gm's? he declares econ war with you after you attack him and now you wanna complain about his tactics in reprisals? untill you guys decced, im guessing he had no intention at all....maybe im wrong 
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:42 am All I know is my name shouldn't continue to be thrown around in the nonsense.... I don't like the Mob, I don't really like Chrysostom much either. Snapp, doesn't deserve any of the fallout, but if my name keeps getting mentioned, there will be fallout.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:44 am not complaining, actually, pointing out that his plan is to keep on antagonizing, regardless of success, until he gets his way.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:44 am Everyone knows Chrysostom is MOB butt kisser #1 This whole war was an act to make it look like c3 wars are effecting everyone. The whole thing is so scripted, I'm tempted to declare war on Chrysostom myself. The whole lot of you Chrysostom and Orbiter/EC/Brutus, you're all geeks. STFU already.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:48 am yea, thats it wendy, you figured us out, you must have got the decoder ring out of a box of cracker jacks..
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:49 am my point was...if he hadnt been decced, he wouldnt be antagonizing anyone
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 01:59 am point taken blue, although about SNAPP, their loyalty to each other... honestly, from the outside looking in, they look like a really cool fed. once they get past this, i'd recommend them for new players.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 02:56 am LOL, I think some people are trying to make this about me, this thread it not. It is about the WG community and the Security Council voting to demand that EC leave war protection. 67 - 10 the community voted for that. Now, as a member of the Security Counciy, I ask the same thing I did the last time the Security Council voted for something. I ask for the WG community to back-up the security council resolution by boycotting the player who refuses to follow it. This is not about me, it is about the 67 players who voted for EC to leave war protection or make peace. The debate is over, the community has spoken. Now it is time for the community to vote for the boycott to force EC to respect the WG community and the Security Council resolution. This is NOT a thread about me, it is about EC failing to follow the resolution passed by the Security Council. The 10 players opposed to the resolution had their vote; they lost. They should join the 67 who voted for the proposal , and support the boycott. Meanwhile, let's not try to change the topic away from the facts. The community voted.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 04:32 am Sounds to me like its about you. I bet all who voted are in snapp or wgc. Now is that fair? You need to have all the presidents of wg vote and then see the outcome. At the same time, you vote to force 1 player out of wp. If that happens, then all players should be forced out of wp.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 04:55 am Those in the 10 may have a tough time accepting it, but the vote in the security council was 7-0. At the time of the vote, the security council included 1 member of The Mob and several members not in SNAPP or WGC. In the 67-10 vote, the community has spoken. A notice was sent to every player on WG, and everyone was invited to vote. Those in favor and opposed had posted information on the forum and there was debate. The vote passed 67-10. The WG community has asked EC to leave war protection or make peace. Until that time, I ask that the WG community support the security council and their own votes and support boycotts of the following countries: Albatross, Cherokee, Epic Chaos, Legion, Rapture, Raven, Reaper, The Independent State of Jakti, The Parted Waters, The Republic of Vibressa, x2, x4, x5.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 05:19 am I support the boycott. It is only fair. I just don't want my name thrown around in this mess.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 05:34 am You support a boycott against players using C3 war tactics?
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 05:39 am Wendy, I appologize for throwing your name around the way I did. I was wrong to have said what I did and ask your forgiveness.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 05:42 am war is never as exciting and fun as it is when its on your terms and time and you can win a definitive win is it? to noone in particular, just an observation.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 06:06 am No Problem Chrysostom, I don't really take it personal at all. Slerrpy, I support a boycott against some hypocrites who in hyper-aggressive fashion delcare war on a peaceful federation, then resorts to what you have been so called opposed to for the last month or more. You boycotted me on LU for spite, at least they have a valid reason. Your group of pirate half wits deserve it...
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 06:44 am Now wendy there you go again including me in something I'm not involved with. I dont want my name(group) thrown around in this mess
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 03:21 pm You admit to being in a group of pirate halfwits? Interesting. Maybe you have low self esteem and a view yourself in a negative light. KEto, you're the cheerleader throwing your pom poms in the air on the pirate half wit sidelines. NOW I've mentioned you. And you aren't going to do anything of consequence about it anyway. Wuteva!
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 04:01 pm I vote for this war to end. I've run out of popcorn.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 04:08 pm actually, i think every one but one person with with you maestro.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 05:11 pm So its the way they dec'd? Not that they dec'd with C3's? Or that they dec'd with C3's when they had bigger, badder countries? Its a simple question, requiring only a yes or no answer, but for some reason (and we all know what it is) you do not answer it simply.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 05:18 pm Slerrpy I said yes, I do support the boycott, in so many words, and for the third time now with one word, YES. Why? I cannot find a better reason other than because just I don't like any of you? Were you trying to make a point?
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 05:33 pm So you support a boycott for players that did the EXACT same thing you do! Hmmmm very interesting. Surprising? NO, but just shows hypocrisy.
| |
| Wednesday, September 22, 2010 - 05:39 pm Orbiter, You talk like your side wants peace. If that is a case, why is it that you refuse to agree to a peace deal? Your side is full of liars who say on the forum that you want peace, but continue to attack and back-outs out of peace offers that your side makes. Spin and lie, spin and lie, spin and lie that is what you do. If you want peace, agree to it. If what you want is to fight me, agree to that. Take your countries out of war protection -- all of you. Until you do one or the other, you remain a bully-chickens, and I remain in a state of war with you. Either (1) agree to terms of peace, (2) agree to terms of war, or (3) continue your spin and lie routine that the WG community has condemned. Here are 2 new offers for you: 1- Peace offer - Agree that all of you will attack no player on WG for the remainder of 2010. War ends in peace. 2- War offer - Agree that all of you will take all your countries out of war protection (except your secure mains). I will take mine out afterwards and will fight you. If I lose my 3 remaining countries, I will strip/sell my main and my enterprise and leave WG. If you folks lose 3 countries, you will all strip/sell all your countries from WG and will leave WG. If you refuse to a peace or a fair fight, then what is their to do but to point out that you are chicken because you know you can not win a fair fight.
| |
| Thursday, September 23, 2010 - 01:18 am Slerrpy, when have me and two other players got together and attacked someone in a fed full of recruits and threatened them if they would have rightfully got involved? Me vs. LDI Me vs. SNA Me Vs. CIS Me Vs. GREF Me Vs. WGC Me Vs. The Mob and Orbiter, EC, Brutus, and possibly BA vs just Chrysostom is what you say qualifies as what I do? Maybe you bumped your head or spoke too soon. But that is not a valid comparison in any event. Notice how there are more opponents on the other side and not on mine. *I* fight c3s by myself against a federation full of skilled opponents. They, did not. They attacked Snapp, big difference. 3 or 4 people targeted a single opponent. Same crap you always do, c3s or not. Please make more sense with your next comment.
| |
| Thursday, September 23, 2010 - 03:34 am Peace has been agreed to, as the WG community and the Security Council had voted for. Therefore, there is no longer a security council mandate for boycotts. Please consider the passed resolution as now being agreed to by the concerned party(ies). Please do not request additional boycotts. Thanks, Chrysostom
| |
| Thursday, September 23, 2010 - 03:38 am You cant dance to good Windy!
| |
| Thursday, September 23, 2010 - 05:14 am Good stuff, glad to hear you worked something out chrys. Windy - Claiming that you fight alone by choice is hilarious when everyone knows the truth...no one likes you...you have no friends...no one is willing to fight with you because you inevitably f*ck them over just like you have every other person who has ever tried to be friends with you.
| |
| Thursday, September 23, 2010 - 05:22 am yaaaaawns
|
