| Matthew Patton (Fearless Blue) | Tuesday, March 16, 2010 - 01:31 am 
Most CEO run weapon companies run negative
c3 weapon companies make a profit
CEOs usually have high salaries
c3 have low salaries
the most productive defense company Ive seen is
off air to air mis 1 is in my country
with a max revenue of 4B 1.7 country resource 600m profit
any others
country resource is 35% or so
so why do CEOs have 100's of weapon companies
are there any others like it? |
| Matthew Patton (Fearless Blue) | Tuesday, March 16, 2010 - 02:21 am
also don't jack up salaries on things like carriers
I seen one that spends 890 mil on salaries and no they don't work
.11 normal
.15 at 897mil 605 index
loose 23 bil |
| Madhatter (Fearless Blue) | Thursday, March 25, 2010 - 04:49 am
Simply just dont own a carrier company. There is only a few weapons type companies that will actually always run positive. So if you see a CEO with a 100's of weapons companies. Perhaps you should look at are they located in that persons countries or allies countries. Is it a company that is usually in the positive giving it a stable market. Also is it something like say ammunition which can be contracted out. Or perhaps that person just wants to be a arm's dealer here on Fearless Blue (The War World) |
| Matthew Patton (Fearless Blue) | Monday, April 5, 2010 - 06:20 am
I have found the ammo is more profitable than the gun. as long as they keep buying and shooting and not shoot me I am happy |
