John Garvin (Kebir Blue) | Thursday, December 16, 2010 - 04:09 pm I would just like to ask, would building a small empire only bring more uncertainty to my already fragile economy, or would it bring financial and strategical benefits? |
The Silverhilltrader (Kebir Blue) | Friday, December 17, 2010 - 12:16 pm With careful planning and work it could have both financial and strategic benefits. |
Tiempo Misdaad (Kebir Blue) | Monday, December 20, 2010 - 03:35 am Build an empire. Even if it screws up your economy, it's worth it since you can say, "I own TWO countries, b*tch!" to the non-empire owning nations. |
Scarlet (Kebir Blue) | Monday, December 20, 2010 - 06:15 am An empire offers more population with which to build up a profitable economic base. The start up costs are a little imposing if you're not too wealthy, but manageable. I would work to build your main to 30M population, then take a slave build it to at least 30M, and repeat. At maximum, once all the countries you currently own have reached 50M+ you should take a new country so you don't need to deal with population losses which can add up. If you remain at War Level 2 or below, you don't need to worry about anyone attacking you. In essence: more people = more profit. Strategically, it's pretty much the same thing: more people = more military. |