| Vallhan Loze (Little Upsilon) | Friday, July 25, 2008 - 08:26 am 
Let's say that me and one of my allies decide to launch a joint invasion of another country. If we were to win the war, could we divide the country up? And besides that, is it possible for both countries to win the war against one?
Different scenario, if I were to invade a country, and my adversary wants to make peace, could I annex/occupy certain territories in his country without taking the whole country?
Last question, whenever you win a war you are given two options, Take the Country or "Just End The War". What is the point of the latter? |
| Loki of Azure (Little Upsilon) | Friday, July 25, 2008 - 08:45 am
1. No you can't do that. Who ever delivers the final hit gets the dough. You can both knock out units left and right jointly.
2. No not without being in war.
3. Take the Country or End the battle. Maybe you just wanted to damage the country financially, or was dismantling their military/nukes by force.
Please someone Correct me If I'm wrong.
~ Loki |
| Zetetic Elench dam Kahveh (Golden Rainbow) | Friday, July 25, 2008 - 10:09 am
"Just End The War" also allows you to test your military on some poor C3, or (with agreement) against a President who wishes to test his/her defences. |
| sfo Treasurer (White Giant) | Friday, July 25, 2008 - 05:14 pm
"Just end the war" also allows you to not be forced to take over the country and it's possible huge debts. |
| Vallhan Loze (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 12:30 am
Oh, thanks for the help. |
| Barney Rubble (Little Upsilon) | Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 06:40 am
"could I annex/occupy certain territories in his country without taking the whole country?"
This is supposedly going to be possible in the future. Not sure when though. Interesting dramas and negotiations could come from this. |
| sfo Treasurer (White Giant) | Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 08:14 am
God, let them fix the bugs we already have before they keep throwing in more upgrades with bugs in them. |
| John R | Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 12:18 pm
The idea of Partial Conquest is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard! |
| sfo Treasurer (White Giant) | Saturday, July 26, 2008 - 06:20 pm
It's like partial circumcision. You either go all the friggin way or forget it. |
| FarmerBob | Monday, July 28, 2008 - 07:24 am
ouch dan. painful metaphor. |
| sfo Treasurer (White Giant) | Monday, July 28, 2008 - 08:53 pm
Sometimes the only things people can relate to , are indeed, pain. Sorry you were victimized by it. |
| Lt.General Richardson | Saturday, October 11, 2008 - 08:25 pm
How is partial conquest stupid when Britain did this with all her colonies then went on to conquer it all you should be able to do this.
Also the allies did this with the d-day landings they didnt conquer all of france in a day did they and they werent stupid now were they. |
| Hanover Fist (Little Upsilon) | Sunday, October 12, 2008 - 11:51 am
Anybody recall the term "Vichy France" from High School? The Germans pulled a partial conquest also. |
| Ari 1 (Little Upsilon) | Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 03:39 pm
Anybody recall simcountry in the history books? Oh yeah, that's right... Its a GAME. |
| Treasurer (White Giant) | Wednesday, October 15, 2008 - 05:32 pm
LOL, very good point. |
