| John Galt | Thursday, February 13, 2020 - 04:46 am 
Andy, I think one more change is needed for FB regarding war levels. As it currently stands now, there are 25 war levels. On FB, if you reach war level 16, you lose the ability to attack players at war level 15 and below. This is problematic. Here is an example of why. Let's say that I as the leader of my federation decide to push for max war level. If another federation were to attack members of my federation who are at lower war levels, I would be unable to declare war to assist my allies. There should be no restriction of this kind on the war world. I believe that once you reach war level 3, anyone should be able to attack you, regardless of how high their war level is. Otherwise we will end up with very gamey tactics where players will intentionally stay below war level 16 so that they never lose the ability to wage war with countries that have low war levels. |
| dubletar | Thursday, February 13, 2020 - 06:29 am
Wow. I thought anyone is able to attack anyone else that is War Level 3 and above? If that is not the case, it definitely needs to be changed. |
| John Galt | Thursday, February 13, 2020 - 12:15 pm
My empire on FB is sitting at WL4 right now and on the war page this is the message that is displayed:
"Anthem can be attacked by Presidents with War Level 3 to 15."
The spread is larger than it is on other worlds, but I think it needs to be removed entirely from FB to avoid potential issues. This is the main reason I haven't made a big push for war levels yet on FB. |
| Zentrino | Saturday, February 15, 2020 - 07:33 am
I agree with this. The war world should be just that...a war world. No hiding below level 3 forever and no restrictions after level 3. |
| ROBERT E LEE | Sunday, February 16, 2020 - 06:47 pm
war lvls should be dont away with on FB , i should also be able to attack c3s for strategic purposes |
| Jonni | Tuesday, February 18, 2020 - 01:28 pm
We're looking into how to change this.
The war world should indeed be the war world.
But we do not want to find ourselves in a similar situation as the past. |
| John Galt | Tuesday, February 18, 2020 - 03:17 pm
Jonni, was the game more active before war levels or after? What are your concerns about eliminating the war level system? Players on peaceful worlds always had one secure country, and they have access to war protection boosters. What exactly was happening in the past that you have essentially killed off all player activity from your game to prevent? |
| Lord Mndz | Tuesday, February 18, 2020 - 05:53 pm
The past was better then the current situation. I very much agree that CEO is for peaceful play and empires need to fight. |
