| SuperSoldierRCP | Monday, January 28, 2013 - 08:12 am 
Andy
I dont know if this was done on mistake, but you say steath bombers do not attack interecptors. But i just did a test where stealths attacked my interecptors and this is what happened.(see below)
they attacked my wings which where assisted by land based defences(2units infact)
How is it far that i only destory 11stealth bombers yet they destory almost 100inters PLUS i lose ammo. My units where 380Q compared to the C3 300Q. The damage done must be a massive oversight, can something be done to where inters do more damage becuase those kind of losses exp when i have a much higher Q AND am recieving mult unit assistances is kind of out of line
Airforce Stealth Bomber Wing Jinna is responding with a counter attack on Defense Interceptor Wing Huamu.
Altair (the attacked country) reports:
�Huamu lost 82 interceptors.
�Huamu lost trucks, gasoline and military supplies.
�94 soldiers were killed and 297 were wounded.
�The defence was assisted by the units Mensa and Stratford.
�The allies lost 47 soldiers and 157 soldiers were wounded.
The Republic of Gonsasa (the attacker) reports:
�Jinna lost 11 stealth bombers.
�Jinna lost trucks, gasoline and military supplies.
�The attack may have been reduced or eliminated by Anti Missile Missiles.
�232 soldiers were killed and 849 were wounded. |
| Andy | Monday, January 28, 2013 - 01:31 pm
I just checked the documentation.
you may have not noticed.
but it is all there.
Can you remind me when I said this?
The weapon is very clear about it. |
| SuperSoldierRCP | Monday, January 28, 2013 - 10:01 pm
Ill have to look it was in the general fourm might take some time(fourm is rather large when searching)
Also i did find something Andy
It says in the doc that 1 interceptor uses 10missiles per round with a 1% chance to hit Stealth bomber. Meaning 10inters are needed to blow up 1 stealth bomber(each inter giving a 10% chance to blow a bomber up). A wing of 130interpectors mean i should have done ATLEAST 13kills. Plus the added strength of the assist my unit got as shown in the docs but even then i did LESS damage then shown.
I did less then what the numbers said i should have done not to mention my unit was 80Q points MORE then the C3 average Q which leads me to believe that the % are not entirely right.
Like i said the GM needs to look into this becuase loss rates of that extent are much to high.
Also a side note when attacking with offensive anti air the accuracy is horriably low.
They have 4% accuracy vs heli but 8% vs interpectors?
I would like to ask the GM look into this becuase as it stands i need around 700 Offensive Anti air in a unit to just clear a single unit of helis to minimize losses and with unit sizes shrinking its getting harder and harder to do so.
May i suggest that these batteries do 10-15% depending on the target? I can understand its harder to hit bombers but it shouldnt be that hard to hit a enemy heli.
I mean honestly it shouldnt take 5batteries firing 25missiles to hit 1 enemy helicopter. |
| Laguna | Monday, January 28, 2013 - 11:19 pm
Quote:It says in the doc that 1 interceptor uses 10missiles per round with a 1% chance to hit Stealth bomber. Meaning 10inters are needed to blow up 1 stealth bomber(each inter giving a 10% chance to blow a bomber up). A wing of 130interpectors mean i should have done ATLEAST 13kills. Plus the added strength of the assist my unit got as shown in the docs but even then i did LESS damage then shown.
It is not that linear. It depends on targetting prioraties and who attacks first. |
