| nix001 | Monday, February 13, 2012 - 01:17 pm 
Why is the US helping the Islaimic Army take over middle east countries? |
| maclean (Kebir Blue) | Monday, February 13, 2012 - 05:21 pm
The current administration is schizoid, and has zero common sense. |
| Psycho_Honey (Little Upsilon) | Tuesday, February 14, 2012 - 04:56 am
This has nothing to do with administrations. The CFR dictates foreign policy the Puppet in the White House simply announces it and acts out the CFR's dictates.
The Pentagon, DOD, and CIA have long supported Al Qaeda. They have funded and Armed Bin Laden and his Mujaheddin conscripts for decades. Starting back when the Russians were repelled from Afghanistan all the way to the recent regime change in Libya. It is no surprise that absent of a mandate from the U.N. the next way to continue the advancement of foreign policy as dictated by the CFR is through covert and black ops. I'm not surprised. This kind of starts to bring some questions to light about Bin Laden and his history as a CIA asset. It kind of also makes one wonder if the entire War on Terror was a CIA Psychological Operation to execute foreign policy objectives absent of Public support and a U.N. mandate.
Bin Laden may have been playing double Agent as he was hidden and supported by the Pakistani Intelligence Complex. Who knows how much intel he gained from becoming a "Folk Hero" among anti-western Islamic nations. He is whisked away once enough Intel is gathered and we are suddenly comfortable Arming and funding Terrorism in Libya, Pakistan, and now even Syria. If you go outside of American Domestic Press the picture becomes a little clearer.
Why did we allow Bin Laden to leave Saudi Arabia after being visited by CIA operatives who could have detained and or captured him before Afghanistan? We needed an excuse to invade that country for it's heroin or poppy crop to supply cheap synthetic heroin to pharmaceutical companies in the United States. We needed to get proper Intel on Pakistan and her Nuclear Arms and internal security and personnel structures and a few c3s on China's border pre World War 3.
Why would we openly arm Al Qaeda in Libya, and now fund Al Qaeda in opposition to the Syrian regime? Because we need to have these lands open and we need a foothold to counter any Russian advance toward the oil rich middle eastern region. Oh, and let us not forget that Bin Laden and Al Qaeda were CIA assets. They more than likely have been for the last 30 or so years. The fact that this is not well known or widely suspected only means someone is doing their job. It wouldn't be a good job, if the CIA were in the business of giving their assets away.
My thinking is the War On Terror was an act, played out on a world stage. All these maneuvers with regard to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Egypt, Syria and then onto Iran are just all the pawns being put in place for the real end game which is World War 3.
By taking or controlling these territories we are taking some very important Initiatives in a pending conflict. If we take or control these countries, we will have a strong foothold and a strategic *chance* of holding the Middle East and making sure the brunt of the battle will be fought there, and not in the US Homeland.
These are just my thoughts, and how I see things shaping up. It all points to a chess match leading up to yet another catastrophic World War. |
| Majin Boo (White Giant) | Tuesday, February 14, 2012 - 06:56 am
Sad bad true.
The difference, big difference, I see nowadays is that Rusia/China woke up and seems to be full committed to NOT let another Afganistan/Iraq/Lybia happen on Iran/Siria.
While USA has been so disgustingly and openly attacking and colonizing other countries for their resources like if they were playing this game - (right after Afganistan war ends, USA announced the "discovery" of the biggest reserve of Lithium... just to name one example) - trying to suck as much strategic resources as they could without buying them legally, and at the same time ensure more "supremacy" by redirecting these resources as they pleased like with Oil.... While this was/is happening It's also true for instance that they still don't control not even half global oil reserves and other key strategic resources and aside from China, Iran and Rusia are pretty well self-supplied. Plus, China is supplied mostly by Iran/Rusia in many of these key resources.
Remember for instance that Rusia/Iran alone means 45% of world GAS reserves. It's widely known Rusia feeds Europe heavily with their GAS... which one would be their option "B"? Qatar? It's hard to believe China/Iran/Rusia will let their neighbor Qatar, feed their "enemies" with their GAS. Add Qatar and you have 60% of world GAS reserves...
Same scenario can be analized on Oil.
Current major Oil producers are Rusia (#2), Iran (#4), China (#6), Venezuela (#7).
Saudi Arabia and USA in #1 and #3 respectively.
Again, China/Iran/Rusia will not interfere and stop their neighbor Saudi Arabia from feeding their "enemies" with Oil?
In addition, silently, India is aligned behind Rusia/China (as soon as it does not include Pakistan).
This WW3 will be really difficult taking into account you will be fighting powerful countries, rich in many key resources and against 2/3 world people -----> convert it to Hand-Working....
WW3 scenario being so so much difficult it's what it will makes it so sadly devastating for everyone everywhere. 
Sad bad true. I hope, as I'm sure thousands and million people hope also, WW3 wont happen but most likely it will . |
| Tom Morgan (Kebir Blue) | Tuesday, February 14, 2012 - 01:10 pm
Arrrggghhh delusional people! Delusional people everywhere! |
| Nicolas Fernandez Ponce | Tuesday, February 14, 2012 - 01:26 pm
hehehe hope you are right then ! We all hope. |
| Christopher Michael (Golden Rainbow) | Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - 05:25 am
"While USA has been so disgustingly and openly attacking and colonizing other countries for their resources like if they were playing this game - (right after Afghanistan war ends, USA announced the "discovery" of the biggest reserve of Lithium.."
Maj Boo, when you start talking about the US going into Afghanistan, don't forget that we were just attacked by that piece of slim Bin Laden. All of you 'conspiracy theorists' have been reading too much crap on the internet! Iraq was a mistake by an idiot of a president (Bush), and Libya ASKED the WEST for help in the ARAB uprising in their country. We, the United States, had every right to attack and occupy Afghanistan, since that's where Bin Laden and his cronies were mostly located, before they ran and hid in Pakistan. Iran DOES not need nuclear weapons, point blank. Whatever the US and Israel need to do to keep that from happening has the support of most in the US, including me! |
| Nicolas Fernandez Ponce (White Giant) | Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - 06:15 am
Okay... so Iran DOES NOT need but Israel does?
And who said they are pursuing Nuclear weapons? Wait, I know that one... It's your president. I'm having a dejavu with this boring story of nuclear weapons... Plus, Bush openly admitted they never had any proof that Iraq were producing Nuclear Weapons, so your main reason to visit Iraq and suck all their resources... pardon, so your main reason to go to war against them was a completely fake from the very beginning (this time public some years later). Despite of how idiot Bush could be, USA citizen supported that war too.
As for the reasons to attack Afghanistan, you might be talking about 9-11... remember that your country was unable to justify that Bin Laden planned and execute the operation to "attack USA".
They refuse to explain many uncleared points instead for the known phrase "security reasons" ---> It was your own country leaders words, not some crap on Internet ;).
Anyways, I'm not going to lose my time with a nationalist.
You will surely deny the fact that USA (along with Russia and some allies) kept the concentration camps active working for them for many years AFTER the WW2 end.
There you have your utopian world and utopian country.
That's another conspiracy theory right? |
| Renegade (Fearless Blue) | Wednesday, February 15, 2012 - 08:19 am
I thought I hath learned all manner of acronyms. What be the CFR? Thy thought process and points made appeareth sound up to the point where ye become delusional. C3's on China's border? Hath thy not looked at the global maps. We haveth many "c3's" on China's border. They art named, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Phillipines, Australia, Thailand, and Vietnam (which alloweth ports of call by US warships).Also, Vietnam and China art historic foes which fought a border war in the 1970's. China and India also be historic foes and hath had a long time border feud. They hath fought a border war as late as the 1960's. China shalt be content with economic prowess and a capable defense. I sayeth all this with greatest respect for thee, who art a great warrior. It seemeth thy conclusions art irrational. Mine Emperor Justinian haveth the greatest respect for The Empress Psycho Honey. Be thee Amazonian?
Renegade |
