 |
|
|
|
Monday, August 1, 2011 - 02:03 am  So much abandoned swag out there!!!! DAMN YOU WAR LEVELS!!!!!!!!!!
| |
| Monday, August 1, 2011 - 02:06 am I still think that if a player goes beyond active in the last month, war levels should be dropped and raids allowed.
| |
| Monday, August 1, 2011 - 03:36 am I Second that
| |
| Monday, August 1, 2011 - 08:05 pm I third the motion Let's see if we can get a whole long list of players asking for this. Both war and econ players. It would be a sensible move to reduce the frustration of war players without affecting any active econ player. Stay active and you keep protected. So less bickering between war and econ, and sorry Mr GM but those assets have been bought and paid for (or given away by yourselves) so why shouldn't they stay in the game? It costs a pretty penny to take inactives. It would stimulate the war related industries, benefitting everyone. YAY!
| |
| Monday, August 1, 2011 - 08:39 pm As currently only an economic player, I would support the motion of 1 month in active but also to be no less than 1 month from the expiry of war protection, which any outstanding allowance should automatically be used after 2 weeks of inactiveness. This is practically means: Last active sign in + 2 weeks + war protection allowance outstanding + 1 month. At each stage, an email should be sent to the player informing them of the stages.
| |
| Monday, August 1, 2011 - 08:44 pm Why the extra 2 weeks or month? You get 1 month before inactive shows. You have any accumulated WP and that should be that. At war level 3 or above this would be the case, once youre inactive and no WP you could be raided. So no, no additions just because a country is below WL 3.
| |
| Monday, August 1, 2011 - 11:32 pm I was slightly confused, mixing up old parts of the game. An email at 2 weeks warning of potential inactive status nearing, which would open the country to raids. I would reccommend any accumulated WP be applied when the country when inactivce status is applied. Perhaps countries nearing reset after losing the president could be published in the Security Council pages. A minimum time is then allowed for attempts to conquer.
| |
| Tuesday, August 2, 2011 - 12:36 am Yeah that would be a great idea, that way I would get the much needed cash for my countries. But if the player returns beyond last month and realizes his country or empire is almost gone, its his own fault for not looking after it often.
| |
| Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - 08:47 am greedy bastards
| |
| Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - 09:06 am i say after two weeks you get a message. After 1 month your open to raiding.
| |
Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - 10:10 pm
bump
| |
| Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - 10:23 pm I agree with the 1 month deadline, and encouraging all players to ask for this...the more the merrier.
| |
| Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - 10:27 pm faulty, and yes.... I agree with hymy1 for once
| |
| Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - 10:51 pm Faulty? Wendy, please expound. Come on, dont tell us you object to raiding assets of gone players before they are lost to the game. Its not greed, its just another way of growing. Is having CEO economies greed because you find they make more money than learning how to run state econs? IPO-ing is greed? Playing the direct trade market is greed? And the list goes on. I call it fair competition.
| |
| Wednesday, August 3, 2011 - 11:37 pm I agree. Fifth'd?
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 02:24 am Can I at least raid Quinton?!?!? He's going to jail, for Bobo's sake!!! I'l give him 3 packs of cigs for equitable tradesies!
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 03:26 am I'm supporting this motion.
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 03:43 am Raid him? Border C hes thousands of miles away from us for christ sake and we will probulary have to set up several remote depots across the world map in order to raid him.
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 03:47 am unless we can weaken him by proposing a trade embargo on him for a while through a security council vote.
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 05:32 am Me thinks BC has a lil obsession over Bobo. lol He's left the game, BC.... you waste your time. Although I'm sure he would find it hilarious that you think of him often. Your obsession ranks up there with WildEyes and Nix. (smiles) hmmmmmmmmmmm could it be....? ha ha ha ha ha
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 11:09 am Bump. Keep on topic please. This thread is for yea or nay on the subject discussed. More names are needed so please post if you are browsing through. If I see enough support I will be proposing for a general vote.
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 11:13 am And sorry for kidnapping it from you BC :p
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 02:02 pm 6th'ed the motion (we're at 6 right?), good idea.
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 02:13 pm Bad Idea. For one, people have countries throughout their empire that have not logged into for a month and they show as inactive. But their main is active. Maybe the time-frame is at issue here, 3 to 6 months inactivity sounds better. And the idea stinks because people do not learn from fighting inactive countries. They also fail to learn econ because there is sooo much raiding to do. It is a double edge sword. It would really benefit new players. Old players should have their stuff together. Learn to play the game on BOTH sides. Econ and war. You can fight each other and gain assets and not need to covet all those goods. That is just how I feel CC, don't take my head off or anything. 
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 03:33 pm I agree with the proposal but I agree with Wendy about presidents not logging into every country. I think the empire should be "inactive" after a month if the President hasn't logged into the main in that time. This would put the slave countries open to raid.
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 03:53 pm Absolutely agree with point above, and to expand that to account wide. Just logging in should keep inactive status if you don't go into one of your countries for months.
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 10:23 pm OK, good point, but also if you are active (have looked at other countries) then surely you would notice if someone declares on a country you havent looked at for a month. Also you get e-mail from the GM about decs. And there is 2 days of waiting for decs to become active. But yes I can concede the point. You dont learn squat from raiding C3s, you would learn more from inactive if it had any kind of defence beyond a C3 level defence. I can also disagree with the raiding hindering learning econ. But kudos wendy for offering another side of the discussion, thats democracy ;) Unfortunately you cant fight each other and gain assets anymore, (well, rarely anyway), not that I ever fought PvP for gain anyway, and I am not too bothered about raiding for myself, I have succeeded in the game to an extent. But there is a lot of newer players out here that could really get going with a bit of a chance to gain money/coins from taking it from countries that are no longer wanted. It only disappears into the black hole anyway. Keep opinions and votes coming please people, We'll make a tally after the weekend when everyones had a chance to read and comment. Thanks... CC.
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 10:57 pm In a game-changing, epic twist,I VOTE AGAINST C3 RAIDS! Take that M. Night Shalamamama!
| |
| Friday, August 5, 2011 - 10:58 pm Ooooooooh! Nobody saw THAT coming! PWNZORPOTOMUS!
| |
| Saturday, August 6, 2011 - 12:00 am Agreed. But why wait for someone to raid? Introduce rebellions, insurrections, or revolutions. If a president doesnt care to look after one of his/her countries for a month, it should "revolt" back to a C3 with all it's swag and war level. THEN let the free-for-all begin.
| |
| Saturday, August 6, 2011 - 03:45 am Kill, Murder, Destroy! Haha. After empire has been inactive for one month, all restrictions should be off. That's one way that I got started. It was a big help.
| |
| Saturday, August 6, 2011 - 02:16 pm Border C why are you against the idea of C3 raiding? i've realized theres still some room to make some profit out of that no matter what the elite players of this game say.
| |
| Saturday, August 6, 2011 - 03:26 pm I meant to say inactive raiding in an attempt to be ironic. I failed and am shamed.
| |
| Monday, August 8, 2011 - 07:14 pm BUMP!!! I think we need more input here peeps. Please ask your mates in game to make a post. Fed leaders, please get your fed members to get involved, either way. Apathy & lethargy is not the way forward for anything.
| |
| Monday, August 8, 2011 - 07:33 pm I agree if the empire is inactive for at least a month we should be able to raid. Also the secured main should lose it securedness, to allow for some swag removal.
| |
| Monday, August 8, 2011 - 08:05 pm ^^ What Keto said.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 12:47 am BUMP Keep this thread alive
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 01:49 am I agree. Ditch the war levels. For a player like me who's just starting its a handicap. Sure it'll keep me protected from aggressive player but I never had any problems from them before the war levels if I kept to myself. There should be an element of risk if you ask me. More fun that way. Another way its killed the fun for me is scouting for countries and planning invasions. Used to love that. Now why bother. Im war level 3 now and my choices are limited to active players prob.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 02:05 am WoW Woad way to appear new.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 02:18 am Err appear new? I dont follow. I shouldnt have a say because im new back to the game?
| |
Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 02:33 am
Please just stop while you're ahead.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 02:41 am Ok tuff guy. Your the man. My countries less than a week old and im already getting threats. Brilliant.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 03:44 am One month inactive, game on. I agree with the above mentioned topic. Or at least the topic above the last few posts. Well, actually the topic when it was the topic. Maybe its back to being that topic. Maybe not. Not that sure yet. Just gonna have to wait and see. I'm eating some egg rolls right now. Not to get off topic.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 04:21 am Wow... first of all WOAD, I am a WO(MAN) You new account is less than a week old. There was no threat. No need to play the victim. I haven't declared war in months, and I wouldn't waste the bandwidth in a futile attempt to teach you a lesson. Stop while you're ahead meant: Stop pretending you are new after making a statement like the one I highlighted. You speak about the issue as if it were in a past tense. If you were only a week old it defies logic for you to have the kinds of insights about not having problems 'if you kept to yourself, becuase you have only been here a week. To be honest, I have heard that same points and rationale regurgitated over and over by noob bashers defending typical noob bashing behavior, and you don't fool me. If you wanted to pretend you were new and someone actually believe you, you would be thankful for war levels as all the other real newbies and you wouldn't be speaking as from experience about dealing with veterans or warlords. Nice try. Come again. I would ask you again to stop while you are ahead, but I can already tell you can't help yourself. Silence Roach!
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 05:16 am Wow that last post by Wendy sure reminds me of the good old days. LOL.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 08:34 am WHO IS THE SUPPOSED WOAD ??? stay tuned after these messages......
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 05:20 pm For a woman you have a teribble attitude. Thats several times now you've called me a noob, now im a roach. For no good reason whatsoever. Who's pretending? Your confused btw. Ive already told you im far from new at this game. I couldn't have been any clearer about that. Somehow you've got it into your head im pretending to be someone new? Paranoid.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 05:21 pm "WHO IS THE SUPPOSED WOAD ??? stay tuned after these messages......" Stay tuned for what exactly? Did I miss something?
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:04 pm Re: Woad, and I quote: "For a woman you have a teribble attitude. Thats several times now you've called me a noob, now im a roach. For no good reason whatsoever. Who's pretending? Your confused btw. Ive already told you im far from new at this game. I couldn't have been any clearer about that. Somehow you've got it into your head im pretending to be someone new? Paranoid." Here are my thoughts. Paranoid? I think not. It is a fact that players come back and come back under different names and just play everyone, have multiple accounts that they own to cause chaos in the game. Well, this apparently is how the game has been played for numerous years. I don't agree with it, and I, therefore, don't choose to play along with your lot. What I don't understand is this.... you aren't a new player.... so what....what's the big secret??? Who were you before? I for one, might actually pay attention to something you say here, if you would present yourself as being on the up and up rather than being some great mystery... just state who you are. If you can't say who you were before, well something is amiss in my opinion. lol Perhaps this is what Psycho_Honey is on about. Your defensive response and the things you say, pretty much sums up my opinion of you and your play ethics in the game. Therefore, paranoid? ha ha ha ha I think 'intuition' and perhaps 'insight' might be more apt terms. PS...what is wrong with you being called a noob??? did you not try to present yourself as such? ha ha ha ha (rolls eyes) We aren't stupid. Noobs (new players) don't usually come straight away in a forum and post insights into the game. The game is far too complex for them to even have an inkling on really what to ask or comment on especially during the first week! I'm sorry, I dun buy into you, as well. NO SALE. :-)
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:22 pm This is a question to lori and wendy, why give toad i mean woad a reason to give a response, why not just choose to not answer woads remarks, oh and yea i agree with this thread i 8th or 9th the motion. me thinks you like the Drama, watch TNT much!!
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:30 pm Actually, my post was not intended for dramatic purposes, Quetz. I exercised my right to voice my opinion just as you do. What I stated is what I really believe to be true. It has been my argument all along. Honestly, I really dun give a rat's a** what Woad's reply will be, because it will be more nonsense and lies. lol
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:35 pm Woe woad, someone called you a toad, not a goad, you got showed. This arguement is being brought to you by Skullz precision bombs. If you need it bombed, turn to skullz, thats precisely what they do.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:37 pm can i point out, that the attitude that every returning player, and 90% of the newbs are all one player, (or group of players,) your not really creating an inviting environment for new players. and i'm torn on inactive raiding. I never did much of it, because their were always a handful of players that would beat me to the punch. back then, i would fix my econ stuff first, and miss out of inactives, that feds being possesive of their inactives. i never had much oppertunity. although i did get a few. insert here, that i talked an ally once into raiding an inactive for the wealth, and experience. he was having a difficult time, and big war vet, (who is now my ally,) took the inactive right out from under him. their is no rule that can stop stuff like that. their is no rule that will prevent 4-6 players from raiding all the inactives, and leaving scraps for newbs. so the argument that opening up inactives for raiding, being good for newbs? i doubt that. most of the inactive will go to experienced players... but i really don't see that as "wrong," i just see that as an excuse to force a change that really wont live up to the goal. yes, newbs will be able to raid. yes it will help, but to be real for a sec, this will benefit the established player more than the new player. this isn't about new players, its about hording resources. not that i have a problem with that. jeese, it'd be rather hypocritical of me to bash hording... i'm just saying, newbs will gain less of an advantage than vets.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:41 pm @ Lorleil There's no mystery. I dont have to explain myself to anyone. Not like this anyway. Couldnt you sent a message say hi? welcome back to the game. Have we met before? No we havent btw. Who wouldnt be defensive been called a noob, a roach? Why should I care if you pay attention or not? Quite frankly your judgement stinks so I dont give a shit.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:47 pm I quote Josias: "can i point out, that the attitude that every returning player, and 90% of the newbs are all one player, (or group of players,) your not really creating an inviting environment for new players." Well Josias had it not been the abuse of the game by such a player or players, it wouldn't really be an issue, would it? It is the misbehavior of one or some that have caused this suspicion and attitude in the game. So you have yourselves to blame for ruining the game. It is rather ironic that you try to 'correct', seeing as you play with and support the very player(s) who have created this problem in the game. You want to improve the game and the way that potentially new players are treated? Clean up your gaming ethics. (I'm not talking about you personally, per se, here, I'm addressing the ones who do not play above board.)
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:50 pm Woad, I'm not really an advocate of name calling. And there is nothing wrong with being called a noob, if you are in fact a new player. :-)
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:55 pm i mean, if you can prove it, then send the evidence to the GM. send it every day. until they do something about it. but really... considering that you are guilty of the "area," of misconduct... i could guess why you don't. and before you denigh it. i know it was you that was controlling bobo's countries when i was fighting him. he told me so. and this was after the whole blue account hyjacking, considering that i was fighting bobo for his part in your hyjacking of blue's account. really, if you have a leg to stand on, its a peg leg.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 07:30 pm Josias. I can see where you are coming from. My thoughts..? Most of the more experienced players want newer players to get experienced, to be able to challenge them, econ and military. Some may be the vultures, but normally that is feds looking out for their own 'property'. A retired fed member has had the benefit of the fed so the fed does have some claim I would have said. There are some rapidly growing new feds of newer players, who are very active and can benefit from this. Let me state that personally I have no intention of asking for this for my own advantage, and I really think most of us 'vets' would behave the same. If they don't, well thats kind of up to us to deal with if its not liked. @Woad, just state your past and your detractors cant argue with you can they. Everyone gets called a multi and cheat and this and the other, prob due to a couple of players who have been caught red-handed, but obviously its not everyone. And no, you can fight wars against C3s up to war level 7, thats when it gets interesting and you can earn some swag!
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 07:34 pm Josias, I deny nothing. I know my wrong doings from before as KissOfDeath. The difference between you and I....I can admit it and I even admitted such to the GMs. I even offered to leave the game if they saw that I was the problem. Instead they took care of the problem, and it wasn't I. :-) Furthermore, if Bobo told you that, it isn't true. I will ask Bobo if he did in fact tell you that or if this is just another one of your lies. I know nothing about how to fight, so I don't see as I could have been the one fighting back. I just shake my head at you and your pathetic attempts to try and take the heat off of you and yours. As far as proof, WildEyes, herself admitted to me just the other day her wrongdoings as it pertained to me in the game, and apologized. I have set aside my differences with her and accepted her apology. I was merely stating a factual problem in the game and explaining why noobs are questioned and are suspicioned. Interesting how you respond on the attack. Doesn't take a genius to interpret human behavior here. And can I ask you a question regarding Blue's account. You said you were fighting Bobo for his and my part in hijacking blue's account. Why are you championing Blue? and why months later? Don't you think if he wanted me and Bobo punished, per se, he is not quite able to do so himself? You are not even game mates. Furthermore, while my behavior then was not right, Blue knows the why's and he is my fiance for God's sake. lol Furthermore, this is NOT why you said you went after Bobo. You said you went after Bobo to get back at me. You are such a liar...just like when you said you would return to Bobo his countries. You put em up for bid, Bobo said he placed bids on three separate occasions, yet you never accepted. You are so dishonorable, it actually makes me sick to my stomach. Then try to turn around and sell them to me for 500 gcs each. A joke. You wonder why the game is failing? It is players like you that make the whole gaming environment so 'unfun', why should we stay? Bobo left, he was so disgusted. I, myself, am disgusted. How many more players are you and yours going to run off? And why do you want them to leave? So you can have game domination? Shakes head. I still stand on my opinion. If whoever would stop with the name changes and messing with long time players, the multi account playing, then there would be no need for any new player to be questioned in this game. I rest my case.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 07:55 pm J. Skullz (Little Upsilon) Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 06:35 pm -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Woe woad, someone called you a toad, not a goad, you got showed. This arguement is being brought to you by Skullz precision bombs. If you need it bombed, turn to skullz, thats precisely what they do. LOL thought this was very funny
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 08:28 pm I had no idea this was such a big deal. Reluctantly to stop any player suspicions of me been a multi or whatever i'll say my past. Last time I played SC I had a 10 or 12 country empire on GR. I was part of Allied forces when we went up against matt. Cant remember what user name I had but my leader country was called Gangland. I left just as that war was ending. Ive had 2 large empires before that. Both on Kebir blue. The first I had was over 40 countries which was an average empire size in those days. Never really interacted with anyone outside fed mates. Sadly I dont see them around no more. I hope that kills of the suspicions. Population is the swag im after crafty ;)
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 08:38 pm After reading pointlessly Woads retarded responses, it is clear to me that he is a moron, and has the bad attitude. He claims to be less than a week old, but after sticking his foot down his own throat admits he isn't new....DUH! You are a ROACH period. Calling you a n00b at this point would be an insult to real n00bs. This is the very reason war levels were introduced. To protect idiots like you who can't follow their own line of BS and 'stay to themselves'. Now that the cat is out of the bag, we see why they are useful, you are NOT and why they are here to stay. YaY war levels... YaY Can 'o Raid! Die CockRoach!
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 09:07 pm lies? really? so did bobo leave, like you said? or is he going to take those countries back from me? also like you said? did he quit or didn't he? i mean its really cool to blame me for something, and then threaten me with a situation that is the exactly opposite of what i'm being blamed for. and yes, i did fight bobo to punish you. an act that i normally would distain, but sitting with so much protection that you run your mouth, and expect your buddies to back u up... so considering his involvement... why can't their be multipul reason? i mean, you demanded i return those countries to you, and then threaten to "have them removed from me," not threatening to do it yourself, but to have some one else do it. and the best part, you threaten to have bobo remove them... and at the SAME time, blame me for him quiting? you know pick one. the points are opposite. "i know it was you that was controlling bobo's countries when i was fighting him. he told me so." -Me I didn't say you fought, i said you controlled the countries. I never receive one bullet in return fire... you how ever did move occ units around to unpaint... when the war was over, and i got to gether with bobo, one of the first things he said, was that it was you, lore as far as not returning the countries... their was one bid that would not go through because of the asset error. a second bid, that i just didn't notice until the time expired. those were the only ones i noticed. their coulda been more, but i didn't see them i did want to return the countries to bobo. between my cost in taking them over, and what i invested into them. with how i IPOd them, i'd have made my money back in 6 rl months. and it would have been to my advatage to have some one else control the country, making me money. it would have been to my advatage, to give the back. additionally, i like bobo. and i set those countries up to make him money, so it'd be good for us both. and even further yet, i fixed the defense, so it was stronger than when the war started... just so i wouldn't leave him defenseless at wl6. i was hoping to create a long term economic partnership between him and i. and i'm really disaapointed that i couldn't return them. my biggest concern about returning them, at the time... bobo had been semi-active, mostly inactive. and i was conerned whether he'd keep them up. but it was my hope, that if he had something that was managable, he'd manage it... and collect money until he was ready to be more active. it was a gamble, that didn't even make it to the table. at the time you told me that he had quit, i had logged into sim chat, just to let you know i was still trying to return them, and i had been trying to find him on msn so that we could do it all at once, and avoid the asset message... but you ignored that, and started demanding i return them... calling me a lier. how ever now, things have become so confused... he quit? and doesn't have access to his MSN? i know that you had access to his account after the hyjacking incident... so i just can't trust i'd be giving them back to bobo.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 09:22 pm I can see there's no getting through to you. Last time I try to clear this up. "My country is only a week old" Doesn't imply that im only a week old. Look at this thread were almost the first thing I said was im not a noob. https://www.simcountry.com/discus/index.html. Check the dates. And im the moron? I suggest you re-read whats been said. At no point have I pretended to be new
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 10:54 pm Josias, try as you like, I have NEVER controlled Bobo's account. Yes, I admit my behavior has not been above reproach. But I assure you, I do play the game fair, at least I have always thought I have. I don't come in under new names and bash other players. If I have something to say about someone, I just say it under MY name. I'm not above being wrong, but I'm also not stupid. I know where my problems in the game originated and you play the game with them. I'm really NOT the bad person here. Never have been. If anyone who knows me in this game, knows the real me..... how I used to be before I became the target of ugly chat games and such nonsense, something no paid gaming member should have to be a part of. Perhaps it is my fault as I do engage in it by responding. But jeez, for how long should I have to deal with it? Well I'm telling you and the others in your game clique, I'm weary of it. Alot of people are weary of it. Attack me all you like. You don't like me. Accepted. And if I run my mouth and my loved ones or friends wish to back me up, that is their decision. But I will always speak my mind, so deal with it or ignore it. :-) I'm not saying anything more on this subject, because I have at last come to realize it is beating a dead horse. Y'all play the game as you see fit and as ugly as you wish to do for the purpose of some game ego.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 11:10 pm o good, your finally done going on about it, about time, jeese.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 11:23 pm Who is woad???
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 11:25 pm lileth lol...changed that post real quick,lmao
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 11:25 pm I change my mind.....end this thread please.
| |
| Saturday, August 13, 2011 - 11:29 pm ooooooh its EC gotta be up real early to catch ol blue out LMAO did u have to change names back to repost LMAO
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 02:21 am fn gosh dangit!
| |
Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 02:30 am
Woad, I have not called you a n00b, In reality where the rest of us live, I accused you of being the exact opposite Someone pretending to be a n00b. If I gave you a shovel, you'd dig your own grave. But thanks to war levels, you won't have to lay in it. Don't you love War Levels now? I think I need some extra strength Raid. The normal strength doesn't appear to be effective on your species of Roach. Must be a sign of the times.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 03:46 am wendy, are you really criticizing some one for talking while being protected? last i heard, you thought it was smart to be protected while irritating people. woad, if you are looking for a fed, or have any questions, or if i can help in other ways. please send me a PM on LU to my main, "central orbital"
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 04:09 am WP/ WL not anywhere near the same thing. At any rate mind your business. Is suits you better.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 04:30 am just wondering, i mean, this guy obviously has a new ACCOUNT, but is not claiming to be a true newb, just new in returning. seems very clear to me, and it seems very clear you are trolling. newb bashing, (if you can call this that, but its easier to type than returning player bashing...) newb bashing is one of the very things that you claim to stand up against. but here you are doing it. and ironically critisizing some one for being protected while they irritate bigger players. although, i really don't think this guy has tried at all to irritate. i mean back to my first point...
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 04:35 am You have no point. That much is more than evident, unless wasting time and space is your point. Back to my point, minding your own business suits you well. This... not so much.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 04:40 am and back to my point, what are you going to do about it? thats right, you are going to sit at a low war level, and mouth off... the very thing that you are critizing woad about... thats wonderful.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 04:52 am *yaaaawns* use one of your other accounts to declare war if you'd like. No secret there. If you used your mouth-off account to move up the war levels that is your problem. Just because your getting all annoyed that I rubbed your friend the wrong way is not my concern. If you feel some kind of way, use any of your other accounts... What's wrong? Can't declare? You and the cowards you run with shouldn't have cried for war levels. AFTER, you all gang banged WGC, turned down a fair 5 on 5 challenge. Yeah you can't be the spokesman for bravado when your soft ass went on an inactive spree using MoP as a punching bag after your pals raided the last standing mostly econ fed in the game. Besides inactive raiding name someone you've actually fought or done anything by yourself with? None, becuase you can't, you haven't, and you won't. You'll just continue trolling while pretending to be some even tempered fellow. Poor you, with 5 accounts. Please biotch, if you feel froggy jump. If you had a point I missed it. I've mouthed these words before. For anyone interested in repeating these words or following a months old convo, go to the WGC thread and read up. Get back to me Josias when you have anything relevant to say.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 05:00 am The wise man sayeth, the hardest thing about business IS minding your own. Case in point.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 05:10 am well, if i had another account, i doubt i'd find you out of protection. although now that most of the big boys have leveled up, you might crawl from under that rock... i think you already know that i don't multi, u just enjoy irritating me, while you sit in protection. which again, is what your doing to woad. who is woad? i don't know. but he doesn't deserve this. he did not start posting in this thread with insults, merely stating his oppinion. which, normally, you defend a persons right to express their oppinion. but because you think he's lying, you critize. but their is also a good chance that you are wrong. and just causing more problems than you are solving. my vote is for the later. when you are ready to play with the big boys, let me know, we'll set up a date. but as it is, you can just sit on the list of people that buy war protection to be safe from me.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 05:26 am besides, this isn't about me, its about you, and your behavior toward woad. you are behaving obtrusely, because you think he is some one else. when really, i doubt you can prove that. you are just guessing. thier was no need to flame him. except for trolling. even if he isn't who he says he is. he did not offer an insult. just an opinion, that is very similar to yours. all of this was unnecessary. further, my original post. assuming all these return players and 90% of the newbs are one person, or group of people, creates an unfreindly enviroment. the attitude was defended with the logic that these "people" show up and flame away at particular people... which is not what this guy did... you know, i can be wrong. i've been wrong before. but this guy, at this time, does not deserve this treatment. if it turns out he is not who he says he is, then yes, he might deserve some flaming. but as it is, it really just looks like a guy that here to have some fun, and is getting blind sided by your own out of control anger, at some one else. from what i can see. it really looks like allot of fresh players are getting shafted, because you assume they are cheating, when they merely just started playing (or restarted playing,) if some one comes out flaming against you, be all means, flame away. for older players, with history, flame away. but give new names the benefit of the doubt...
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:19 am again? did you have a point?
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:21 am Josias.... why are you so involved in this issue? Why are you so defensive.... so quick to go on the attack? Do YOU love drama? You rank right up there with us women. ha ha ha ha Most of the guy players dun bother too much wif the drama, except a very few that I recall...Just an observation. :-)
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:30 am The only reason anyone need to buy war protection to be safe from Josias and his other accounts is if you were inactive. And no, I DO KNOW you multi, I don't know that you don't, I don't know you apart from this game, never have or will. Now at level 7 in your mouth off account I have no will or desire to play the war level game. I have refused since its inception at your request. You bore me and everyone else here. The only reason YOU are mouthing off is because I have reduced my account to nothing, sold my gold coins and have barely an active empire on FB. You haven't squashed a grape in this game except for inactives, and in this day and age there will be no difference. You're pathetic and sad, and need some way to feel involved or relevant. This game sucks because of you and people like you requesting stupid shit that now prevents you from following through on your empty threats. I have declared war on players that have proven their value and worth equal to your own weight in gold. I've never been scared or needed an invitation. The size of your accounts, war slaves, or army has never deterred me from attacking anyone in this game, including those far more powerful and skilled than you think you are. So go play that tune where someone wants to dance. You;re boring, pathetic and sad. I am not railing Toad for being new, I pointed out that he WAS NOT new while pretending to act like he was. He then called me a man, and insulted me. I can and will respond how I choose and according to his own stupidity shall he receive a response. And if YOU don't like it, what will you do? Nothing... Flame away, yes, that is all you've been doing since Kiss said anything to him. You've been in defense mode on his behalf ever since she posted and given your track record of defending each other even in a multi- point of view I am not surprised. Take the tuff gurl act somewhere else cuz you are straight counterfeit.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:38 am boredom breeds trolling. Psycho would know all about that. I agree with Josias. (Thanks for the country BTW) Enough with the hate and noob-slaying. He's returning, but his account is new. Period. I hate the bad culture that is breeding on these threads. Noobs aren't bad people. Everyone was one at one point. How would you feel if, when you first posted on the forum, you were continually critised over basically nothing? Pretty shit. Stupid. Hated. I'm done telling off ignorant single-minded people for now.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:41 am Tom know your n00b role and shut your mouth.
Go ahead Polish his knob a little more you fairy.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:43 am sighs heavily at Tom Morgan.....
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:04 am "How would you feel if, when you first posted on the forum, you were continually critised over basically nothing? Pretty shit. Stupid. Hated. " TomM first Tom, thanks for the vote of confidence. greatly appreciated. but i'd like to put in a kind word for wendy, (psycho honey,) she did experience that. It was partially her own fault, but less hers than the people that attacked her. I was their, and am still ashamed to this day for not sticking up for her then. secondly tom, i know how much work that country will take to fix. from what i've seen from you on the chat, looks like you are having a great time fixing it. send me a message if you need anything, or help with the country. its a good country, i just didn't have the time to fix it. and jeese you 2, you pretty much proved Tom right with your responses.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:08 am and wow wendy, that was so much horse manure that i'm not going to waste my time responding.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:13 am Should i recount the horrible bashing I have sustained from players such as Josias and his game buddies consistently over the last two years????? Gosh, Josias, our first convo, ugliness came out of your mouth directed at me. Stop with the Mr. Sim Do-Gooder act. Or you just wanna give me a good laugh. Where were you when I was continuously attacked, called whore....etc. Why.... on one of those occasions you sat in the offing and 'watched'. Remember, you said it was more fun to watch. So, please, I don't think you really qualify as someone to preach on chat and forum ethics, Mr. Drama Queen. :-)
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:19 am what are you talking about? i know, but you like to be vague, and then change the subject, hoping to make the other guy look foolish. so with this general statement, lets be a bit more clear. but i can say this, 2 years ago, i was in the middle of the 1 year break i took from SC... you are generalizing me with my allies. and frankly, i haven't seen the type of abuse you claim. at least not at the level you claim.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 11:04 am Psycho, I was a little suprised to discover you were a female. I was convinced you were a gang member drug dealer, judged by your tone. Honestly, I expect that people will behave like adults and civilised to each other. This isn't Libya, but Psycho seems to already have me on his most wanted. You're a real turn-off to this game and I am sick and tired of reading your crap on the forums. Try being a little empathetic for once. The phrase "grow up" comes to mind, but I don't want to sound (more) like a single mother. Pathetic.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 11:06 am Lorelei, even if he did at one stage call you a n00b, at least NOW he is trying to make a difference.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 03:44 pm Tom, noone called me a noob, and even if they did, it would not offend me at all. Thank you, anyways.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:18 pm Tom learn when to STFU n00b!
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:27 pm And yeah Josias, you can stop spamming these boards with your lame fake azz tough guy ramblings like you're gonna do anything but shrug cuz we all know without your friends or some inactivity boy you are cotton candy, SIMPLY SUHWEET! Softer than a baby's azzz is more like it. Now go find the rock you've been hiding under before I slap you with some baby powder.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:54 pm aww, wendy. if i could say something that would make you actually prove your point in game... but you'd rather run your mouth at no risk to yourself. which you claim is smart, unless some one else does it... haha, thats why your lame arguments have no meaning to me. Tom, what lorelei is hinting at, well, i didn't call her a newb. what i said to her was in apropo, and i apologized to her immediately for it. it was months ago. and every time her and i talk, she ends up throwing it in my face. even though she claims to have excepted my apology. but the base point is, what i said to her was wrong for me to say. it was funny, but one of those crude things that a man shouldn't say to a women. and i truly regret saying, for no other reason than it was wrong. but i can only apologize so much. and at a point where it isn't let go, it only removes any common ground that might lead us to verbal peace. but last night in chat. lore tried to drop the entire agrument with me. and promised to stop needling me. and seemed very loath to continue arguing with me. hopefully its over.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 06:56 pm Didn't I tell you boi?!?
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:04 pm is that the best you can do?
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:19 pm Better than you can do obviously... chump.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:20 pm *shrugs*
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:44 pm Actually psycho honey I'd prefer no protection whatsoever. Not even mains. Like it used to be. Your way off the mark. Lorelei I apoligise for been so abrupt to you. Thank you Josias. Much appreciated. I may have a few questions.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 07:58 pm If you prefer it, move up the war levels to 3 remove protection and secured mode.... BAM your wish has been granted. I am not way off on anything. Who cares how you prefer it. My only issue is you speaking as if you were a n00b about war levels. If you prefer anything then play the way you prefer. In the meantime stop pretending.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 08:13 pm Im already on war level 3 but now I cant attack any inactives on a lower level which they all seem too be. Ive wasted those war levels on worthless C'3. Instead of more valuable targets. That's what my issue was. For a returning player back that takes time to figure out. Ill say this again at no point have I pretended to be anything.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 08:39 pm Yeah, at THIS point SO, let me get this str8. You mean the problem is that you actually are upset that you have actually attack a level 3 Player Controlled Country instead of raid your way to success. Try learning how to play the econ game if you can't raid --OR-- untuck your tail from between your legs and fight someone already --or-- STFU and deal with it.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 09:00 pm All the inactives are level 0 is the problem. They could be war level 10 for all I care. Only active players are higher than 3 that ive noticed. What's wrong with raiding exactly? Better the country go to an active player than be wiped clean?
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 09:04 pm There's so much love in this thread I could make a baby! ^_^
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 09:08 pm Lol.
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 09:23 pm First u got tits, Laguna.... now u making babies??!!! OMG! ha ha ha ha ha
| |
| Sunday, August 14, 2011 - 10:25 pm Got Milk?
| |
| Monday, August 15, 2011 - 03:56 am I've got loads of it. But it isn't the kind of milk you put on your cereals... or do you? LOL You know how it is, Lorelei - it's that time of the month. ;0
| |
| Monday, August 15, 2011 - 05:01 am LOL
| |
| Monday, August 15, 2011 - 05:41 am Eeew... Ewwww... EEEEEEWWWW...!!!! LG!
| |
| Monday, August 15, 2011 - 05:52 am I think I'll whack him wif my cast iron skillet! WHACK!
| |
| Monday, August 15, 2011 - 05:25 pm LOLOL! I'm sowwy! I just couldn't help myself. I'll be a good boy now; no need for whacking. :p
| |
| Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 12:38 am Well, this thread took an unexpected turn.
| |
| Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 12:47 am For the Best!
| |
| Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 01:20 am Oh yeah!!!
| |
| Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 04:16 am I see now what my purpose is in Simcountry.....and it involves my cast iron skillet. Laguna.... you better be a good boy. Ask Blue....The wrath of Lorelei is legendary. :S
| |
| Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 03:41 pm Witness
| |
| Tuesday, August 16, 2011 - 10:51 pm Can you make cheese from that LG?
| |
| Wednesday, August 17, 2011 - 12:41 am *vomiting*
| |
| Wednesday, August 17, 2011 - 01:23 am /me looks at Lorelei... I'll leave the
| |
| Wednesday, August 17, 2011 - 04:10 am /me watching, waiting, and waving the skillet.... (smiles evilly)
| |
| Wednesday, August 17, 2011 - 06:42 pm I just found this interesting and informative!!!!
| |
| Sunday, August 21, 2011 - 05:20 pm as a ceo in fb i wnt to tranport nukes from my enterprise in fb to my country or enterprise in wg. how do i transport the goods from one world to an other of sell a nuke from one world to an other please advise???????????????
| |
| Sunday, August 21, 2011 - 08:53 pm Youy can't use the space function with a ceo. Trade stuff to a country if you have one and do it that way
|
